250 likes | 484 Views
Team 16. Probe. Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon. Sponsors. NHMFL Applied Superconductivity Center. The Project. Modify existing cryostat probe to conserve the amount of liquid helium used during a critical current measurement test. Objectives. Conserve Helium
E N D
Team 16 Probe Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon
Sponsors • NHMFL • Applied Superconductivity Center
The Project • Modify existing cryostat probe to conserve the amount of liquid helium used during a critical current measurement test.
Objectives • Conserve Helium • Test 6-8 straight samples • 1 Spiral sample • Capability to deliver 1000 Amps to samples • Durable
Existing Probes Current leads
Concept 1 – Heat Exchanger • Exposed Copper leads source of major heat leak • Cooling these exposed leads will decrease temperature difference
Concept 1 – Design • Covers current leads • Cools leads using excess gaseous helium • Vent valve at top
Concept 1 - Pros & Cons Pros Cons Self design and manufacture May not decrease temperature enough to implement • Simple concept • Reduces temperature difference • Uses excess helium as cooling gas
Concept 2- HTS Leads • Replacing Copper with HTS leads • Path of least resistance
Concept 2 Pros Cons Possible quenching expensive • Reduces amount of helium used • Provides current a path with less resistance • Reduces heat leak from current leads
Concept 3 – Structural Support • Concept 2 • HTS leads – tape • Shell • Casing • Currently a stainless steel casing, 16 W/m*K • Replace • Spacers
Concept 3 – Pros & Cons Pros Cons Material must withstand cryogenic temperatures Sacrifice structural support for thermal conductivity? • Lower thermal conductivity • If correct materials, should reduce heat leak and provide structural support
Concept 4 – Reduce Leads • Reduce the amount of leads • Leads are major heat leak • Temperature gradient • Possible double PCL • Possible Parallel • Maintain 6-8 samples with least amount of leads possible • Optimization
Concept 4 – Pros & Cons Pros Cons None because it is an optimization • Optimizes system • Less leads = less heat generation = less helium consumption
Concept 5 - Fins • Increase heat transfer • Reduce the temperature gradient • Ideally use circular fins • Easy to manufacture
Concept 5 – Pros & Cons Pros Cons Effectiveness of fins may be hard to determine due to space Hard to implement • Increases the surface area • Decreases the heat transfer taking place in the liquid helium
Concept 6 – Gas Insulation • Using the helium burn off gas to insulate the material. • Layer of gas between the leads and fluid • Non-boiling, Nucleate boiling, film boiling • Changing the orientation of leads • Vertical Vs. inclined • Trapping of gas, wells
Orientation • Wells
Concept 6 – Pros & Cons Pros Cons Space Design constraints • Create an insulating layer • Can theoretically decrease heat transfer by an order of magnitude
Concept 7–Spoke Thermal Cap • G-10, a fibrous material, is used as a current lead spacer • Modification to this part can interrupt thermal conduction of the stainless steel tube.
Concept 7- Design • Thermal cap protrudes through stainless steel
Concept 7 – Pros & Cons Pros Cons Difficult assembly Increase in resistance may be small • Increases thermal resistance through the stainless steel tube
Next Step • Evaluating each concept by modeling and experimentation • Assign value to ease of use, effectiveness, cost and other criterion • Decision matrix or other methods of concept selection
References • Ekin, J. W. Experimental Techniques for Low-temperature Measurements: Cryostat Design, Material Properties, and Superconductor Critical-current Testing. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006. Print. • Cengel, Yunus A., Robert H. Turner, and John M. Cimbala. Fundamentals of Thermal-fluid Sciences. Boston, MA: Mcgraw Hill Higher Education, 2008. Print. • "October 2010." Gaming News and Reviews. Web. 24 Oct. 2011. <http://gamingnewsreviews247.blogspot.com/2010_10_01_archive.html>.