1 / 25

Post-EPS Status at PMET-7

Post-EPS Status at PMET-7. 2015. 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2021. 2012. 2011. 2014. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. 2013. 2020. Post-EPS Overall Programme Planning. EUM Phase 0. Phase A. Phase B. Phase C/D. Ops. Readiness of IR and MW Sounding VIS/IR Imaging Missions.

giuseppe
Download Presentation

Post-EPS Status at PMET-7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Post-EPS Status at PMET-7

  2. 2015 2007 2008 2009 2010 2021 2012 2011 2014 2016 2017 2018 2019 2013 2020 Post-EPS Overall Programme Planning EUM Phase 0 Phase A Phase B Phase C/D Ops Readiness of IR and MW Sounding VIS/IR Imaging Missions All Post-EPS Missions Prep. Programme Development and Operation Programme EUMETSAT Approval Processes ESA Programme ESA Ministerial Conf. go ahead for phase B/C/D

  3. 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Post-EPS Programme Planning, Timeline Phases 0 and A EUM Phase 0 Phase A ESA Ph. 0 Studies Ph. A Studies Prelim. Assessment Review (missions shortlist) Mission Definition Review Preliminary Requirements Review MTR PCR 2nd User Cons. Workshop EUM Approval of Preparatory Programme ESA C-Min-11 go-ahead for Ph. B/C/D MTR = Mid Term Review PCR = Preliminary Concepts Review

  4. Cooperation with NOAA on JPS (1/3) • Regular meetings of the technical and high-level working groups are held with NOAA to work towards an extended cooperation past IJPS and JTA • A concept paper has been drafted for negotiation of a JPS and is under approval by DB • Model is similar to that of IJPS and JTA • NOAA spacecraft operate in early morning and afternoon orbits • EUMETSAT spacecraft operates in mid-morning orbit • Exchange of instruments as far as practicable • Collaboration on developments for data exploitation • Exchange of data • Timeline • Draft JPS agreement finalised in Q4 2009 • JPS agreement to EUMETSAT Council and US authorities at end of Phase A

  5. Cooperation with NOAA on JPS (2/3)

  6. Cooperation with NOAA on JPS (3/3)

  7. Recent Council Decisions Relevant to Post-EPS (1/2) • The opportunity of flying Earth observation payloads on the Iridium-NEXT constellation of satellites should not be pursued • Adopted the initiating resolution on the preparation of a Jason follow-on programme, authorising the DG to prepare a full Jason2 follow-on optional programme proposal and a related declaration (to be adopted) • All 21 member states indicated their interest in participation • Funding scheme needs to be secured among partners before optional programme can be proposed • Adopted way forward for the implementation of GMES Sentinel 5 on Post-EPS • Consider S-5 as PEPS baseline in terms of design and development • Rely on ESA provided S-5 ground processor • Manage delta-development within an optimised approach for GS procurement • Have full control of the overall process up to GS level and end-to-end system verification and validation • Discuss with EU about the necessary funding to cover operations costs of S-5

  8. Recent Council Decisions Relevant to Post-EPS (2/2) • With respect to the GMES long-term governance EUMETSAT should play the role of operational agency in the areas of • GMES Marine Core Service • GMES Atmosphere Service • The planned GMES Service for Climate Monitoring • During GMES pre-operations, access by the three GMES fast track services and two pilot services to EUMETSAT data will be granted free of charge • For the GMES S-3 development , a third party programme will be established

  9. Current activities • ESA: 2nd industrial Phase 0 study for Post-EPS (Thales Alenia Space has been kicked off) in July 2008 • Preliminary Assessment Review was held in June 2008 • Mid Term Reviews to be held in December 2008 (Astrium) • and January 2009 (Thales) • Follow national studies • DLR: METimage, Phase A completed, Phase B started in September 2008 • CNES: IASI follow-on, Phase 0 completed

  10. Preliminary Assessment Review Outcome

  11. Objectives of Preliminary Assessment Review (PAR) • “to decide on the observation missions to be retained for further study” • ref. to “potential for implementation within the anticipated budgetary constraints” (EUM/C/63/07/DOC/46) • It implies • a review of the preliminary assessment of the candidate missions, and its consistency with mission and programmatic requirements • It is an opportunity to • give recommendations on the execution of the industrial studies

  12. PAR Objectives / Selection Criteria

  13. PAR Non-Objectives • The PAR is NOT expected to anticipate: • Specific payload options (for those missions to be retained) • A space or ground segment configuration • Available elements are too preliminary, often and on purpose limited to a “baseline” or heritage concept for a rapid programmatic/cost assessment • Relevant concepts are to be established in the industrial studies managed by ESA

  14. Scope of PAR: Observation Missions (1/2)

  15. PAR Scope: Observation Missions (2/2)

  16. PAR: Non-Observation Missions/Services • Data Collection System (PARD, TBC) • Search & Rescue (PARD, TBC) • User Services (MRD): • Direct Data Broadcast • Near Real Time Data Distribution • Archiving and Retrieval • Reprocessing • User Support Space and Ground Segment impact Ground Segment impact Not in scope of PAR But system impact should be taken into account

  17. Scope: Phase 0 Studies Post-EPS Specific Approach “standard” Phase 0

  18. Scope: Phase 0 Study (2/2)

  19. Candidate Mission Ranking

  20. Candidate Mission Ranking (after the PAR)

  21. Programmatic Constraints - A summary table

  22. PAR Outcome – Missions to be Retained in Phase 0 Studies • Infrared Sounding Mission (IRS) • Atmospheric Chemistry requirements must not drive the instrument • Microwave Sounding Mission (MWS) • Visible/Infrared Imaging Mission (VII) • Scatterometry Mission (SCA) • Microwave Imaging Mission for Precipitation (MWI – Precipitation) • Radio Occultation Mission (RO) • Multi-Viewing Multi-Frequency, Multi-Polarisation Imaging Mission (3MI) • Accommodation of Radiant Energy Mission (RER) • Accommodation of Ultraviolet Visible Near Infrared Shortwave Infrared Imaging Mission (UVNS) via GMES Sentinel-5

  23. 2nd Post-EPS User Consultation Workshop

  24. 2nd PEPS UC Workshop – Objectives (1/2) • Inform users on relevant mission requirements • WMO: vision and requirements of the WMO space programme in the PEPS era • GOS: evolution of the space-based observing system • EUMETSAT: lessons learnt from EPS • Introduce candidate observation missions, prioritisation, and down-selection process for industrial studies • PMET-Chair: introduction to the candidate observation missions • EUMETSAT: details on observation missions, their prioritisation and down-selection • Present the potential of the system in various application areas • PMET

  25. 2nd PEPS UC Workshop – Objectives (2/2) • Inform users on programmatic assumptions and constraints • EUMETSAT • Inform users on the status of concept studies • EUMETSAT: notional concepts • ESA: Phase 0 studies outcome • ESA: Status of GMES S-5 • Inform users on US approach for next generation polar system • NOAA: NPOESS and its follow-on • Inform users on status of related projects • CNES: IASI follow-on • DLR: METimage • Acquire users’ feedback

More Related