330 likes | 520 Views
Toronto Divided?. Polarizing Trends that Could Split the City Apart 1970 to 2005 J. David Hulchanski with Larry Bourne, Richard Maaranen, Robert Murdie, Alan Walks Cities Centre, University of Toronto & Neighbourhood Change Community University Research Alliance, St. Christopher House
E N D
Toronto Divided? Polarizing Trends that Could Split the City Apart 1970 to 2005 J. David Hulchanski with Larry Bourne, Richard Maaranen, Robert Murdie, Alan Walks Cities Centre, University of Toronto & Neighbourhood Change Community University Research Alliance, St. Christopher House Toronto District School Board, ICAC January 2010
Toronto: Justice Denied? Mark Kingwell: A just city ... “Though a city in pursuit of glory may neglect justice, the opposite does not hold: a truly just city is always a glorious one, because it allows greatness even as it looks to the conditions of strangeness posed by the other.”
Toronto: Justice Denied? Mark Kingwell: A just city ... “does not oppose development, including grandiose development, ... but it does demand, over and over, that all development be, at some level, in the service of every one.” – Mark Kingwell, “Toronto: Justice Denied,” The Walrus Magazine, May 2009
A Divided City “The plain truth is that our inner city is now a virtual ghetto dominated by a single ethnic group - one that is increasingly cut off and isolated from the rainbow-hued paradise we all hoped to build in the new century.” 4
The “Growing Gap” from 30% to 250% Income Inequality 10
25 years: 128 neighbourhoods, 25% of the City, PERSISTENT INCOME DECREASE relative to the average 25-year Income Inequality Trend 11
www.gtuo.ca Gentrification: one form of neighbourhood change – SES of residents 12
Middle Income (+/- 20% of avg.) from 66% of city to 29% in 2005 1990s Income Polarization: the decline of the middle income group 13
1970 to 2005 decline City = -37%905 = -25% Decline in # of MIDDLE INCOME neighbourhoods in the City & “905” City “905” 14
Cities 1,2,3 Income Distribution, 1970 to 2005 City #1 City #3 City #2 16
Canada’s Urban Policy: Urban Growth Nodes Diversity: but only in some parts of the country 17
City #3 Black Population, 2006 Segregation? Black population – Neighbourhood concentrations 20
RECENT IMMIGRANTS • City #1 = 4% • City #2 = 8% • City #3 = 15% • City avg. = 11% Spatial SEGREGATION a 450,000 newcomers between 2001 and 2006. In which neighbourhoods do they live? a Segregation? Immigrant settlement – Recent 5 year period (2001-2006) 21
THE CONTEXTTOTAL Gov. Expenditure % GDP, 1970 TO 2007 France France Canada, 1992 Germany 1973 1984 UK Canada Canada United States 24
THE CONTEXT Fed. program expenditures, 1961 TO 2008 1993 Transfers to persons Transfers to Persons x x x x Transfers to other levels of government Canadian Government Transfers, % of GDP Canada has returned to early 1970 levels 25
PolicyOptionsfor the Divided City • INCOME STRATEGY • HOUSING STRATEGY • LABOUR MARKET STRATEGY ____________________________________________________ • Inclusionary Zoning • Rental Housing Rehabilitation • Eliminate vacancy decontrol • Maintain existing rental buildings with 6 or fewer units • “Tower Renewal” initiative 26
PolicyOptions continued • Second suite incentive program • Encourage rooming houses, SROs, supportive housing • Reduce parking requirements & related reg. reforms • Prov. share of land transfer tax to municipalities • Energy program for low-income households • Support small independent neighbourhood businesses • Active social / community development planning • __________________________________ • __________________________________ 27
Mayor’s Tower Renewal Transit City 28
“There is ... no justification for the level or condition of poverty that coexists with this wealth.” • “Poverty does not directly cause violence ... • If not ameliorated it can nonetheless play a central role in generating • alienation, • a lack of hope or opportunity, • low self-esteem, • a sense of having no future and • other immediate risk factors” The level of poverty The concentration of poverty The circumstances of poverty 29
“no one should be seriously disadvantaged by where they live” Policy Options 30
Priorities Transit City 31
For further information www.gtuo.ca www.NeighbourhoodChange.ca