270 likes | 513 Views
Grading and Grade Inflation at Georgia Tech. Preliminary Report to the Academic Senate April 22, 2003. Grade Inflation Defined. The upward shift in the grade point average (GPA) of students over an extended period of time without a corresponding increase in student achievement.
E N D
Grading and Grade Inflation at Georgia Tech Preliminary Report to the Academic Senate April 22, 2003
Grade Inflation Defined The upward shift in the grade point average (GPA) of students over an extended period of time without a corresponding increase in student achievement. Goldman, L. 1985. “The Betrayal of the Gatekeepers: Grade Inflation.” Journal of General Education 37 (2): 97-121
Methodology • Extensive study of literature • Survey of peers and other institutions of higher education • Statistical analysis of Georgia Tech data • Focus on undergraduate level only • Historic perspective • In-depth study of last 10 years by department
CalTech Carnegie-Mellon Cornell Johns Hopkins MIT Northwestern Stanford NC State Penn State Purdue Georgia Tech’s Peer Institutions • Texas A & M • UC-Berkeley • UCLA • Florida • Illinois-Urbana • Michigan • Minnesota • Texas • Washington • Virginia Tech
Other Institutions Reviewed • University of Arizona • University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill • Harvard University • Louisiana State University • Hood College
Peer Review • Surveyed 10 peers for recent grade inflation studies at their own institutions • Compiled grading definitions, including the use of plus/minus systems, at all 20 peers • Review of grade inflation studies at other institutions, most notably UNC-Chapel Hill and Harvard
Of the 10 Peers Surveyed… • Five had conducted studies on grading and grade inflation • These five “studies” ranged from the effects of a plus/minus grading system to charts showing SAT score plotted against GPA • Interesting responses from Berkeley and MIT regarding need to do such studies
Grade Definitions at Peers • Most use 4.0 scale • Standard: A = Excellent, B=Good, C=Satisfactory, D=Poor/Passing, F=Failure • CalTech and MIT use Pass/Fail in freshman year • 14 peers use some form of plus/minus grading system
Cause for Alarm? • At Princeton, the median GPA for the class of 1973 was 3.09; in 2000 it was 3.36 • At Dartmouth, the average GPA has risen from 2.70 to 3.33 from 1967 to 2001 • At Harvard, over the last three years, more than 50% of the grades awarded have been A’s • At Georgia Tech, the average overall GPA in Fall 1985 was 2.59; last Fall, it was 2.86
Harvard’s Solution: Policy Change • 15-point grading scale became the more common 4-point scale • Honor degrees will be awarded to a limited percentage of each graduating class (20% summa cum laude and magna cum laude combined and 50% overall)
External HSGPA SAT Admission Index Proportion of Women Internal: Variations by Dept. Presence of Grade Deflation in Some Units Impact of Instructors’ Tenure Status Sources of Grade Inflation
Implications REPUTATION OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
Mitigation • Adoption of more clear and specific grade definitions • Adoption of a plus/minus grading system • Establishment of a University/Institute average GPA • Expanded transcript data • Changes to student honors • Broad dissemination of grading definitions and policies • Training for teaching assistants, adjunct faculty, and tenure-track faculty • Self-calibration of grade distributions • External calibration of grade distributions • External enforcement of grade distributions • Standardized testing • Changes to student course evaluations
Report Outline • Scope and Definitions • Grading at Georgia Tech • Opinions • Analysis of Peer Institutions • Discussion • Sources • Implications • Remedies • Conclusions and Bibliography
Conclusions? • Statistically, there is grade inflation • Peer comparison does not indicate cause for alarm • Quality of incoming students is increasing • Lower level courses: quality of student experience • Impact of tenure status of the instructors • Non-uniform departmental distribution