1 / 14

Thermo-mechanical Stress in a Beryllium Superbeam Target for EUROnu (Separate target and horn)

This study analyzes the thermal stresses induced in a cylindrical beryllium superbeam target for EUROnu using FLUKA and ANSYS simulations. The analysis considers quasi-static thermal stress, acoustic stress waves, and elastic stress wave propagation.

glenk
Download Presentation

Thermo-mechanical Stress in a Beryllium Superbeam Target for EUROnu (Separate target and horn)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thermo-mechanical Stress in a Beryllium Superbeam Target for EUROnu(Separate target and horn) Peter Loveridge High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK P.Loveridge@rl.ac.uk January 2011 1

  2. Introduction • Analysed the thermal stresses induced in a cylindrical beryllium superbeam target for EUROnu using FLUKA and ANSYS simulations • “Quasi-static” thermal stress • Driven by non-uniform heating • Acoustic stress waves • Arise due to “short” duration of the applied heating 2 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  3. Analysis Procedure (ANSYS) • Multi-stage process involving linked FLUKA and ANSYS simulations • Can choose which physical timescales to investigate: • “Quasi-static” thermal stress[thermal conduction timescales of the order ~seconds] • Inertial stress due to bulk oscillations (“violin modes”)[1st mode period typically of the order ~milliseconds] • Elastic (acoustic) stress wave propagation[characteristic time period of the order ~microseconds] A typical process flow diagram for beam induced heating analysis 3 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  4. ANSYS Model Setup Beam • Beryllium cylinder Ø30mm L780mm, cantilevered from the upstream end • 1 MW beam power on target (concept is 4 targets in 4 horns) • 1.11e14 protons/pulse, 4.5 GeV, 12.5 Hz repetition rate • 41 kW time averaged power in target [FLUKA] • 3.3 kJ/pulse @ 12.5 Hz • well centred beam, sigma = 4mm • Uniform heat transfer coefficient applied at the outer surface Time averaged heat input load 4 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  5. Beryllium Material Properties 5 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  6. Beryllium Material Properties Note degradation in strength at elevated temperature Suggest to limit Tmax to, say ~250°C ? Need to define a design stress limit as some fraction of σy 6 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  7. Single Spill Effects (Quasi-Static stress) • Q. What is the effect of a single beam spill? • At room temperature a single spill generates a ΔT of 19°C and a Von-Mises stress of 28 MPa • At elevated temperatures the ΔT is somewhat reduced (see temperature dependent material properties) 0°C 19°C 0MPa 28MPa Temperature increase (left) and Von-Mises thermal stress (right) corresponding to a single beam spill at room temperature • i.e. the effect of each individual beam spill is quite modest 7 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  8. Steady State Operation (Quasi-Static stress) • Q. What is the cumulative effect of a large number of beam pulses? • Radial ΔT depends on average power and thermal conductivity • This drives the “quasi-static” thermal stress magnitude • Surface temperature depends on heat transfer coefficient • To limit the max steady-state core temperature to say ~ 250°C we need HTC = 10 kW/m2K, Tbulk = 30°C • Seems reasonable for direct water cooling Temperature (left) and and Von-Mises thermal stress (right) corresponding to a steady state operation with a surface HTC = 10kW/m2K, bulk fluid temp = 30°C 8 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  9. Steady State Operation Results Summary σy σy Results summary for steady-state analysis 8 targets 6 targets 4 targets 3 targets 2 targets 9 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  10. Quasi-Static Stress: Conclusions • The high beam repetition rate (12.5 Hz) means that each individual pulse generates only a modest ΔT (19°C) and thermal stress (28MPa) • However, the large average power on target (~40kW) leads to a significant thermal stress at steady-state operation • 1 MW beam power per target looks challenging in terms of safety factor on yield stress 10 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  11. Elastic Stress-Waves Single beam spill Gauge-point • Elastic stress waves propagate at the speed of sound in the target material • They act in addition to the “quasi-static” thermal stress 11 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  12. Effect Of Spill Time • Stress-waves are only generated where the spill time is short with respect to the characteristic dimensions and speed of sound in the target. ~50 MPa 12 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  13. Elastic Stress-Waves: Conclusions • EUROnu spill time is likely to be short enough to generate acoustic stress waves in a beryllium target • Need to allow for ~50 MPa in addition to the “quasi-static” thermal stress 13 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

  14. General Conclusions and Future Work High pressure helium gas Beam • The combined stress-magnitude generated by a combination of 1. the “quasi-static” steady-state stress (220 - 240 MPa) 2. the acoustic stress waves (50 MPa) 3. off centre beam induced “violin modes” ( ?? MPa) appear too large for a solid beryllium target operating at 1 MW average beam power. (recall Beryllium σy ~225 MPa) • Suggest to investigate the following: • “Sharp pencil” geometry 14 Peter Loveridge, January 2011

More Related