190 likes | 360 Views
Aiming at Quantum Information Processing on an Atom Chip. Caspar Ockeloen. Outline. Quantum Information with Ultracold Atoms Magnetic lattice atom chip Atom number fluctuations Conclusion. Quantum Information. Requirements: Scalable Long coherence time Nearest neighbor interactions.
E N D
Aiming at Quantum Information Processing on an Atom Chip Caspar Ockeloen
Outline • Quantum Information with Ultracold Atoms • Magnetic lattice atom chip • Atom number fluctuations • Conclusion
Quantum Information Requirements: • Scalable • Long coherence time • Nearest neighbor interactions
Kelvin 104 – 103 – 102 – 101 – 1 – 10-1 – 10-2 – 10-3 – 10-4 – 10-5 – 10-6 – 10-7 – – Solar surface – Room temperature – High TC superconductor – Liquid Helium – Ultracold atoms Ultracold Atoms • Clean and isolated Quantum systems • Coherence time up to 1 minute!
Magnetic lattice atom chip Magnetic FePt film + External B-field Magnetic trapping 22 µm Rubidium atoms (mK) 10-1000 atoms per trap Lattice of ~500 traps Goal: each trap ↔ 1 qubit
B B p=ħk Magnetic lattice atom chip Trapping and manipulating atoms • Ultra high vacuum + atom chip • Lasers + magnetic field trap atoms • Cooled to several mK • Transfer atoms to microtraps • Image atoms with CCD camera CCD
Absorption Imaging Atom chip Absorption image of full lattice CCD S. Whtilock et al “Two-dimensional array of microtraps with atomic shift register on a chip”, NJP, (2009)
Single site manipulation How to make qubits? Optically address single sites Transport all atoms across the lattice
Collective excitations • One excitation shared over ensemble • Highly entangled state • Potentially more robust and faster • Excitation rate depends on atom number Requires small and well defined ensembles of atoms
Classical limit: Shot Noise • Atoms are discrete particles • Poisson distribution: N ± √N atoms
Three-body loss • Dominant loss process • Three atoms → Molecule + Free atom • 3-body interaction: density dependent
Initial distribution 3-body loss Poisson distribution Three-body loss Effects on atom number distribution Poisson distribution N = 100 sN = 10
Three-body loss Mean atom number Fluctuations F=0.6 Fano factor: F = 1 ↔ Poisson
Mean atom number (a)
Fluctuations Sub-Poissonian! S. Whitlock, C. Ockeloen, R.J.C Spreeuw, PRL 104, 120402 (2010)
Fluctuations F = 0.5 ± 0.2 for 50 < N < 300 Not limited by technical noise Fluctuations below classical limit Promise for high fidelity operations Ideal starting point for Quantum Information
Conclusions Magnetic lattice atom chip > 500 atom clouds Optically resolved and addressable Sub-Poissonian atom number fluctuations F = 0.5 ± 0.2 Promising platform for Quantum Information
Outlook • Long range interactions • New lattice design • New geometries • 5 mm spacing • In vacuum imaging • Quantum Computer...
Thank you S. Whitlock, C. Ockeloen, R.J.C Spreeuw, “Sub-Poissonian Atom-Number Fluctuations by Three-Body Loss in Mesoscopic Ensembles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 120402 (2010) S Whitlock, R Gerritsma, T Fernholz and R J C Spreeuw, “Two-dimensional array of microtraps with atomic shift register on a chip,” New J. Phys. 11, 023021 (2009)