1 / 58

The Verification of an Inequality

The Verification of an Inequality. Roger W. Barnard, Kent Pearce, G. Brock Williams Texas Tech University Leah Cole Wayland Baptist University Presentation: Pondicherry, India. Notation & Definitions. Notation & Definitions. Notation & Definitions. Hyberbolic Geodesics.

glora
Download Presentation

The Verification of an Inequality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Verification of an Inequality Roger W. Barnard, Kent Pearce, G. Brock Williams Texas Tech University Leah Cole Wayland Baptist University Presentation: Pondicherry, India

  2. Notation & Definitions

  3. Notation & Definitions

  4. Notation & Definitions • Hyberbolic Geodesics

  5. Notation & Definitions • Hyberbolic Geodesics • Hyberbolically Convex Set

  6. Notation & Definitions • Hyberbolic Geodesics • Hyberbolically Convex Set • Hyberbolically Convex Function

  7. Notation & Definitions • Hyberbolic Geodesics • Hyberbolically Convex Set • Hyberbolically Convex Function • Hyberbolic Polygon o Proper Sides

  8. Examples

  9. Examples

  10. Schwarz Norm For let and

  11. Extremal Problems for • Euclidean Convexity • Nehari (1976):

  12. Extremal Problems for • Euclidean Convexity • Nehari (1976): • Spherical Convexity • Mejía, Pommerenke (2000):

  13. Extremal Problems for • Euclidean Convexity • Nehari (1976): • Spherical Convexity • Mejía, Pommerenke (2000): • Hyperbolic Convexity • Mejía, Pommerenke Conjecture (2000):

  14. Verification of M/P Conjecture • “The Sharp Bound for the Deformation of a Disc under a Hyperbolically Convex Map,” Proceedings of London Mathematical Society (accepted 3 Jan 2006), R.W. Barnard, L. Cole, K. Pearce, G.B. Williams. http://www.math.ttu.edu/~pearce/preprint.shtml

  15. Verification of M/P Conjecture • Preliminary Facts: • Invariance of hyperbolic convexity under disk automorphisms

  16. Verification of M/P Conjecture • Preliminary Facts: • Invariance of hyperbolic convexity under disk automorphisms • Invariance of under disk automorphisms • For we have

  17. Classes H and Hn

  18. Classes H and Hn

  19. Classes H and Hn

  20. Reduction to Hn • Lemma 1. To determine the extremal value of over H, it suffices to determine the value over each Hn. Moreover, each Hn is pre-compact.

  21. Reduction to Hn • Lemma 1. To determine the extremal value of over H, it suffices to determine the value over each Hn. Moreover, each Hn is pre-compact. • A. Hn is compact

  22. Reduction to Hn • Lemma 1. To determine the extremal value of over H, it suffices to determine the value over each Hn. Moreover, each Hn is pre-compact. • A. Hn is compact • B.

  23. Reduction to Hn • Lemma 1. To determine the extremal value of over H, it suffices to determine the value over each Hn. Moreover, each Hn is pre-compact. • A. Hn is compact • B. • C. Schwarz norm is lower semi-continuous

  24. Examples

  25. Reduction to Re Sf (0) • Lemma 2. For each n > 2, • A. • B. • C.

  26. Schwarz Norm For let and

  27. Reduction to Re Sf (0) • Lemma 2. For each n > 2, • A. (Nehari) implies • B. • C.

  28. Reduction to Re Sf (0) • Lemma 2. For each n > 2, • A. (Nehari) implies • B. There exist • C.

  29. Reduction to Re Sf (0) • Lemma 2. For each n > 2, • A. (Nehari) implies • B. There exist • C. Invariance under disk automorphisms

  30. Julia Variation • Let Ω be a region bounded by a piece-wise analytic curve Γ and φ(w) piece-wise C1 on Γ .

  31. Julia Variation (cont) • Let Ω be a region bounded by a piece-wise analytic curve Γ and φ(w) piece-wise C1 on Γ .

  32. Julia Variation (cont) • Let Ω be a region bounded by a piece-wise analytic curve Γ and φ(w) piece-wise C1 on Γ . At each point w on Γ (where Γ is smooth), let n(w) denote the unit outward normal to Γ. For small ε let and let Ωε be the region bounded by Γε.

  33. Julia Variation (cont) • Let Ω be a region bounded by a piece-wise analytic curve Γ and φ(w) piece-wise C1 on Γ . At each point w on Γ (where Γ is smooth), let n(w) denote the unit outward normal to Γ. For small ε let and let Ωε be the region bounded by Γε.

  34. Julia Variation (cont) • Theorem. Let f be a conformal map from D on Ω with f (0) = 0 and suppose f has a continuous extension to ∂D. Then, for sufficiently small ε the map fε from D on Ωε with fε (0) = 0 is given by where

  35. Two Variations for Hn • Variation #1

  36. Two Variations for Hn • Variation #1

  37. Two Variations for Hn • Variation #1

  38. Two Variations for Hn • Variation #1 • Barnarnd & Lewis, Subordination theorems for some classes of starlike functions, Pac. J. Math 56 (1975) 333-366.

  39. Two Variations for Hn • Variation #2

  40. Two Variations for Hn • Variation #2

  41. Schwarzian and Julia Variation • Lemma 3. If then • Lemma 4. If and Var. #1 or Var. #2 is applied to a side Γj, then

  42. Schwarzian and Julia Variation • In particular, where

  43. Reduction to H2 • Step #1. Reduction to H4

  44. Reduction to H2 • Step #1. Reduction to H4 • Step #2. (Step Down Lemma) Reduction to H2

  45. Reduction to H2 • Step #1. Reduction to H4 • Step #2. (Step Down Lemma) Reduction to H2 • Step #3. Compute maximum in H2

  46. Reduction to H2 – Step #1 • Suppose is extremal and maps D to a region bounded by more than four sides.

  47. Reduction to H2 – Step #1 • Suppose is extremal and maps D to a region bounded by more than four sides. • Then, pushing Γ5 out using Var. #1, we have

  48. Reduction to H2 – Step #1 • Consequently, the image of each side γjunder Kmust intersect imaginary axis

  49. Reduction to H2 – Step #1 • Consequently, the image of each side γjunder Kmust intersect imaginary axis

  50. Reduction to H2 – Step #2 • Suppose is extremal and maps D to a region bounded by exactly four sides.

More Related