1 / 13

The Place of Visual Arts in Education

The Place of Visual Arts in Education. Liz Ashworth, Faculty of Education, Nipissing University. Why bother learning about visual arts’ place in education?. There is a strong “back-to-basics” movement in politics and school boards everywhere Rarely do non-artists take art seriously

gloria-barber
Download Presentation

The Place of Visual Arts in Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Place of Visual Arts in Education Liz Ashworth, Faculty of Education, Nipissing University

  2. Why bother learning about visual arts’ place in education? • There is a strong “back-to-basics” movement in politics and school boards everywhere • Rarely do non-artists take art seriously • Money is usually cut from arts programs first • Someday, you may have to protect your program from extinction • Knowing the history is power for you

  3. Art Education in Ontario • Pre-public education, apprenticeships were common • Artistically-talented often waited until adulthood to take formal art courses (usually for rich only) • In 1840s, public education introduced in Ontario by Egerton Ryerson • Art included in technical training only

  4. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • Ryerson divided curriculum into three subject areas: “Cardinal”, “Required”, and “Other” • Only boys studied “Cardinal” subjects (Greek and Roman culture) • All students studied “Required” subjects (Math, Philosophy, History, Geography, English)

  5. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • “Other” subjects (boys) - Bookkeeping, Commercial Math, Technical Drawing • “Other” subjects (girls) - Music, Dancing, French, Fancy Needlework, Drawing, Painting • This model lasted for a decade, until it was replaced by Britain’s South Kensington Model of Education

  6. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • 1850s – government created the Department of Science and Art • Formed to aid and control art schools and exams, supervise and train art teachers • Main goals – sharpen industrial design skills, provide instruction in decorative arts, train drawing teachers for private and public schools • This model continued until after WW2

  7. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • Post WW2 – technical and academic schools merged to form secondary schools • 1970s – more academic approach to teaching art; schools of the arts formed • Art curriculum left mostly to individual teachers and based on their areas of expertise • Much pressure from post-secondary institutions to streamline art curriculum

  8. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • 1986 – OSIS art education document introduced • Very prescriptive (strict percentages of time for design, studio, art history, criticism) • OAC course worked out to 50% studio and 50% art history; with inclusion of final exam, course content was 70% knowledge about art but only 30% knowledge of creating art

  9. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • 1990s – art programs threatened by “back-to-basics” movement • Money cut, art viewed as a non-essential “frill” • Some schools cut out one or more level of instruction (Basic, General, Advanced) or cut out art entirely • 1997 – government looked at replacing art teachers with non-certified instructors

  10. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • 2000 – OSS documents introduced • Art instruction levels changed to Open and University/College entrance • Expectations more vague than 1986 document; used strands (theory, creation, analysis) and no percentages • Provided for mandatory cumulative art curriculum from K-12

  11. Art Education in Ontario, cont’d… • Visual arts programs now threatened by new rigorous graduation requirements and demise of OAC (less room for “optional” subjects in timetable) • Students need only one arts credit to graduate; could be art, music, drama, or dance • New bridges between art and technology • Design education and creative problem-solving skills across the curriculum

  12. What Can You Do? • Market your program well to intermediate students • Become an art education activist among staff, community, government • Become aware of proposed Ministry of Education changes to art education policies • Be prepared for at least one major art curriculum change in your career (usually change every 15 years)

  13. References Clark, R. (1994). Art Education: A Canadian Perspective. Toronto: OSEA. Gidney, R.D. (1999). From Hope to Harris: the reshaping of Ontario’s schools. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Gidney, R.D. (1990). Inventing Secondary Education: the rise of the high school in nineteenth-century Ontario. Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

More Related