110 likes | 120 Views
The Overall Classification of this Briefing Is: UNCLASSIFIED. Executing Homeland BMD. Brig Gen Ronald Buckley Deputy Director for Operations USNORTHCOM. NORAD and USNORTHCOM. WE HAVE THE WATCH. Agenda. Our Homeland BMD Mission Key Players Homeland BMD into the Future Summary.
E N D
The Overall Classification of this Briefing Is: • UNCLASSIFIED • Executing Homeland BMD • Brig Gen Ronald Buckley • Deputy Director for Operations • USNORTHCOM NORAD and USNORTHCOM WE HAVE THE WATCH
Agenda • Our Homeland BMD Mission • Key Players • Homeland BMD into the Future • Summary
Homeland Ballistic Missile Defense • USNORTHCOM is responsible for defending the United States against ballistic missile threats • The Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) was developed to counter a limited threat from a rogue nation
Trusted Partnerships • USNORTHCOM will command and control selected BMD forces during ballistic missile events that could threaten the US • NORAD conducts Aerospace Warning/Aerospace control, and Maritime Warning in support of Defense of North America • USPACOM supports USNORTHCOM by providing surveillance, cueing, and tracking support to GMD operations • USSTRATCOM supports USNORTHCOM with missile warning data and integration of global missile defense assets • Missile Defense Agency is the material developer and also provides testing and maintenance of much of the system
Threat – Current and Future • Adversarial countries and/or “rogue” nations are developing ballistic missile capabilities and nuclear technologies that could threaten the US • North Korea • Ambitious ballistic missile program • Long-range ballistic missile inventory is small • Mobile launch capability in development • Iran • Long-range & space missile programs • Continuing to develop their nuclear program • What’s Next?
Defense of the Homeland Capabilities:The GMD System • OPIR • GMD Fire • Control • (FDC) • GMD Fire • Control • (MDE) • GBIs • Ft Greely, AK • Cobra Dane • UEWR • Beale AFB, CA • UEWR • Fylingdales, UK • UEWR • Thule, GL • Aegis • BMD • GBIs • Vandenberg AFB, CA • Sea-based • X-band Radar • AN/TPY-2 • Shariki • AN/TPY-2 • Kyoga-misaki
How does the BMDS keep pace? • Addition of a second axis complicates the problem set • Ever-tightening budgets require a deliberate, well-planned acquisition plan • Mobile sensors add flexibility but require time to deploy, heavy reliance on I&W • Terrestrial-based fixed sensors, small coverage area and host nation / basing complexities • We are enhancing our capability some with new technologies such as redesigned kill vehicle, LRDR, and possible addition of another persistent sensor for the defense of Hawaii. • When do we start looking to space for the solution set
Space Sensors Pros: Cons: High cost Historic schedule / cost overruns No ability to upgrade / repair once on-orbit • Near global coverage possible • No basing issues • Less susceptible to threat • Increased possibilities for multi-mission support • Hosted payloads / mission partnering could lead to cost savings • One well-executed space program costs • about the same as how many terrestrial sensors?
Summary • USNORTHCOM, along with all our mission partners, stands ready to defend the homeland from a limited long-range ballistic missile attack • As the threat continues to mature, we must continue to look at better, more cost-effective solutions to keep pace (minimally) or outpace (preferred) them with our capabilities • We are rapidly approaching a crossroads – continue with terrestrial-based architecture or start investing more in space capabilities • 5