370 likes | 405 Views
Western Cape Department of Agriculture MEC JJ Dowry. 11 February 2008. Departmental Expenditure. Expenditure per Programme. Expenditure per Economical Classification. Conditional Grants. CASP. Purpose:
E N D
Western Cape Department of AgricultureMEC JJ Dowry 11 February 2008
CASP Purpose: To provide post settlement support to targeted beneficiaries of mainly land reform and other producers who have acquired land through private means
CASP: 2006/07 • Budget – R20,648 million • Spent – R20,644 million (unspent R4 000) • 143 Projects (61 LRAD & SLAG) • 5 765 Beneficiaries • 461 Youth • 3 459 Women • Mainly fruit and vegetables
CASP: 2007/08 • Budget – R33,426 million • Actual Spending to 31 Dec 2007 – R14,822 million • 107 projects ( 46 LRAD & SLAG) • 53 Food Security projects • 5 390 Beneficiaries • 3 868 Women and Youth
CASP: 2007/08 (cont.) January 2008 – R3,317million
LandCare Purpose: Through sustainable resource management, improve and develop the livelihoods of individuals and communities through integrated governmental and community based partnerships
LandCare: 2006/07 • Budget – R3,115 million plus R615 000 roll over • Spent – R3,480 million (under spent by R250 000) • 25 projects (junior LandCare and alien clearing) • 481 beneficiaries (jobs in alien clearing) 34 430 person days • 162 women • 2 950 youth (Junior LandCare) attended camps • 13 500 youth attended Junior LandCare puppet shows
LandCare: 2007/08 • Adjusted Budget – R3,317 million • Actual Spending to 31 Dec 2007 – R1,512 million • 32 projects (Junior LandCare, alien clearing) • 769 beneficiaries (jobs) or 28 398 person days • 140 women • 5 150 youth (Junior LandCare) attended camps • 9 300 youth attended Junior LandCare puppet shows
LandCare: 2007/08 January 2008 – R0,163million
Challenges • Time constraints linked to staffing • Legal issues within groups (contracts, legal entities not functioning, conflict) • Serious cash flow problems and debts • LRAD programme take 35 – 40% of FSD • “Sleeping partners – tail wagging the dog” • Reallocation of funds - ± R 3.2 million due to selling off farms and Bank legal processes and repossession of farms
Challenges (cont.) • Alignment issues (organisations, programmes and government grants) • Stakeholder participation, i.e. Municipalities etc. • Drought and floods – delay implementation of projects • Pre-settlement training of LRAD beneficiaries • 2008/09 application process started in 2007/08 • Shortage of Engineers, Economists & Subject Matter Specialist • Projects are staff driven not beneficiary driven
Challenges (cont.) • Technical staff had to do verification of 2006 flood damages on 550 farms • Technical staff involved in flood repair and recovery work • Abnormal high rainfall in Southern Cape and Klein Karoo in 2007 led to delays in project implementation
Remedial Action • Intended for next financial • year • N2 Corridor connected • Started October 2006 • Started August 2007 • Regular meetings held to • finalise joint approach • Involvement of more NGO’s and Farmer Unions • IT – Wireless connections • LRAD – Monthly meetings with DLA • DPAC Committee • M&E – DLA and PDA monitor projects
Remedial Action (cont.) • Comprehensive support to LRAD projects 2008/9 • Outsource Infrastructure pillar of CASP to Casidra • Auditor General requirements –paper trail • Intended for next • financial year • Intended for next • financial year • Currently underway
Drought Relief Purpose: To give relief to livestock producers in declared drought stricken areas by supplying limited fodder and transport thereof
Drought Relief: Process • Assessment of specific areas for signs of drought • Establish a representative committee to assess areas • Prepare a report for national DoA, via Provincial Disaster Management Unit • After national DoA concurs that it is a disaster area, then DoA approaches the Presidency for a declaration, and then national Treasury for financial support • After funds have been obtained, then a framework agreement is finalised and gazetted • Administrative process then gets put in place • Only after this, then funds can flow to the affected farmers
Drought Relief: 2006/07 • R10,199 million roll over • Spent – R7,582 million (under spent by R2,617 million – transferred to hail disaster in 2007/08) • 1 015 households benefited of which 318 were emerging farmers
Drought Relief: 2007/08 • Budget – R20 million received in December 2007 during the adjustment estimate • Spent – R0 • R10 million expected to be rolled over to 2008/09
Drought Relief: 2007/08 January 2008 – R5,87million
Flood Relief Process • After the flood, a team of agricultural engineering specialists assesses the damage (preliminary) • This information is fed to the Provincial Disaster Management Unit, who then prepares a report for cabinet, which then submits this decision (disaster) to the Presidency for a disaster declaration • After the declaration, then different national Departments approach national Treasury for funds • After the funds are secured then the DoA and PDA agree and enter into a framework agreement • Staff then has to assess, verify and analyse individual claims in terms of the framework • And only after this verification process is completed, payments can be made
Flood Relief: 2006/07 • Received December 2006 (Adjustment Estimate) – R33 million • Unspent – R33 million (Spending prescripts finalised in May 2007 only)
Flood Relief: 2007/08 • Received December 2007 (Adjustment Estimate) – R10 million • Spent – R7,856 million (Spending prescripts finalised in May 2007 only) • 182 of the total number of 550 landowners affected by the floods benefited from flood relief and recovery works to date
Flood Relief: 2007/08 January 2008: R0,656million
Hail Relief: Process • Similar to Flood process
Hail Relief: 2007/08 • Received December 2007 (Adjustment Estimate) – R9,231 million • Spent – R3,453 million • For period of 3 years • 394 Beneficiaries – 346 retrenched farmworkers re-employed and 48 additional workers employed • R4,2 million to be rolled over to 2008/09
Hail Relief: 2007/08 January 2008: R1,338 million
Monitoring & evaluation • Each Programme has its own M&E system • Field staff visit projects on regular basis • FSD Programme created positions for M&E officers – only 1 was filled, but left for 3 levels higher in Eastern Cape • Challenges: • Post level of M&E officers • Scarcity of skills in the specific field
Monitoring & evaluation Institutional Monitoring & Evaluation • Standing Committee • Annual budget, annual report • Appropriation budget • General policy issues • Parliamentary Questions • Ministerial enquiries (Red Numbers) • Laws that govern us and to which we must adhere (Strategic Plan p17-19) • Strategic Plan, Annual Performance Plan, Skills development Plan, EE Plan, etc. • Service Standards Charter
Monitoring & evaluation Finances • Departmental quarterly narrative reports to Provincial Treasury (PT) • Quarterly narrative reports on CASP and LandCare to DOA • Quarterly compliance with PFMA report to PT • Monthly in Year Monitoring and conditional grant report on financial status of Department to PT • Monthly financial report on CASP and LandCare to DOA
In answer: • Question 3: • Monthly reporting is done