1 / 24

WAsP-ForestGALES : a merged tool for improved forest wind damage prediction

Integrate WAsP wind field predictions in ForestGALES for improved forest wind risk assessment. Enhance spatial variability of wind field using automated coupling. Recipe and methods for Aberfoyle forest case study discussed.

graceg
Download Presentation

WAsP-ForestGALES : a merged tool for improved forest wind damage prediction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WAsP-ForestGALES: a merged tool for improved forest wind damage prediction Ebba Dellwik, Duncan Heathfield, Barry Gardiner WORLD INABOX

  2. Starting point Currently, the ForestGALES model does not include a spatially varying wind field. We insert WAsP wind field predictions into ForestGALES and propose an automated way of doing this. A simple flow model (such as WAsP) is better than no flow model.

  3. Risø national laboratoryand the orgin of WAsP

  4. Risø national laboratory and the origin of WAsP In 2017, WAsP is still the most widely usedsitingtool for wind turbines.

  5. Key model properties WAsP: Surface parametrization Elevation map Roughness map for large area. Displacement height map (optional) Wind input Observations fit to a Weibull distribution Output Prediction based on a linearized model (IBZ) for terrain elevation and a parametrized non-linear roughness change model. Gridded wind field “resource grid” ForestGALES: Stand parametrization Compartments where the forest properties are constant, added by user. Some of the forest parameters are recalculated to {z0,d} using Raupach (1994, 1995). Wind input DAMS score based on Wind Zone and local elevation or Weibull distribution from data. Output Wind risk assessment

  6. Example case: Aberfoyle in Southern Scotland Intention: Predict a map of time until first damage for a small area of Aberfoyleforest and discuss how the map would have looked without the coupling.

  7. Recipe for “TOMBERONT”: Raw ingredients • Map of DAMS windiness zones for UK (Source: Forest Research) • Ordnance Survey explorer elevation contour data for tile NS, NT (Source: OS) • Aerodynamic roughness data for a 50km square area around Aberfoyle (Source: GWA Map Server for Online WAsP) • Forest stand data (polygons and properties) for Aberfoyle area (Source: Juan Suarez) Method • Make a WasP *.tab file representing DAMS windiness score, and make a WasP *.lib wind atlas file from the DAMS tab file • Make a WAsP-optimised elevation vector map • Use ForestGales to get roughness lengths from forest map • Blend forest-derived roughness map with background roughness map • Construct WAsP workspace with small resource grid, and run • Get Weibull A and K for sector with maximum speed for each node • Use ForestGales to get predicted return period for each node

  8. Work flow: trial coupling at Aberfoyle WAsP: Surface parametrization Elevation map Roughness map Displacement height map Wind data input Weibull distribution of observed wind fields. Output Gridded wind field “resource grid” with Weibull parameters for each grid point ForestGALES: Stand parametrization Compartments where the forest properties are constant added by user. Some of the forest parameters are recalculated to {z0,d} using Raupach (1994, 1995). Wind DAMS score based on Wind Zone and local elevation. Output Wind risk assessment

  9. Making the WAsP roughness map

  10. Addition of Corinne roughness

  11. Comparison of roughness values from stand data and Corinne map Z0 forest = 1.2m Corinne Stand data Juan Suarez, Raupach (1994)

  12. Final roughness map LARGE area Example zoom in

  13. Preparing for fast simulations Low res High res 20 km

  14. WAsP output

  15. Forest risk map, ForestGALES Increasingrisk

  16. Other possible recipes • Using WAsPCFD, WAsP Engineering instead of WASP IBZ (the traditional linear orography model + nonlinear roughness change model) • Using a global extreme wind climate from WAsPEngineering • Using Gumbel distribution instead of Weibull • Add the displacement height to the elevation map in WAsP • Use airborne lidardata to estimate roughness + displacement height values

  17. Lidar scan of Aberfoyle

  18. Orography

  19. Max. Treeheightwas set to 35m

  20. Max PAI = 6

  21. Roughness (h/10), couldbeadjusted to differentforestheightfraction. 60m resolution 300m resolution

  22. Conclusions It seems possible to integrate ForestGALES with WAsP. The integrated models provide more detailed spatial information on wind risk. There are several possible ways of improvement. Next step: Automated beta-version testing by expert users after September. Anybody interested ?

  23. Thankyou for listening!Contact: ebde@dtu.dkRead more aboutwasp: www.wasp.dk 200 years 100 years 50 years 0 years

  24. Scan density (firstreflections) Emptysquare corresponds to half-empty .las file.

More Related