1 / 15

PLATO

PLATO. PLATO TOU KO MEETING‎ H. Rauer (DLR PF) H. Kinter/A. Salado (Kayser-Threde). Activities. Mission selection in Feb. 2014 Payload industrial management is being assigned for “bridging period” and B1 Phase to Kayser-Threde Status of payload teams , PDC, PSPM is reviewed

gracie
Download Presentation

PLATO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PLATO PLATO TOU KO MEETING‎H. Rauer(DLR PF) H. Kinter/A. Salado(Kayser-Threde)

  2. Activities • Mission selection in Feb. 2014 • Payload industrial management is being assigned for “bridging period” and B1 Phase to Kayser-Threde • Status ofpayloadteams, PDC, PSPM isreviewed • „Kick-off“ Phase B1: July 16/17

  3. PLATO Camera Management Support Overview

  4. Agenda • KT Team Organization and responsibilities • Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities • B1 Schedule Overview: • KT Questions to TOU team

  5. PLATO Payload Management Key Personnel

  6. Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities Phase B1 Planning • Detail roadmap until KO Phase B1 and beyondSynchronization of all partner activities • Major Milestones for the Phase B1

  7. Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities Preparation B1 Kick-Off Data Package

  8. Phase B1 • 1st P/L Meeting has been on 06./07.05.2014 • Bring P/L consortium together • Start to resume P/L teams • Phase B1 KO is scheduled for 16./17.07.2014 • Official Start of Phase B1 • All work packages are already defined • Tasks to be done between KO and 2nd P/L Consortium Meeting will be defined • 2nd P/L Meeting proposed Fall 2014 • All specifications and belonging annotations/supplements are available as basis for the B1 development work

  9. PLATO Phase B1 Schedule

  10. Overview of major Phase B1 Deliverables • * drafts to be prepared by KT • Specified deliverables defined in the List of Deliverables, which may include Camera Reports (design, budgets, performance, straylight, thermal, structural, risk assessment), MAIV plan, Management Plan, mathematical models

  11. Communication between TOU team and KT • List of all deliverables to be defined and finalised by 2nd P/L Meeting • PMs to be held at TOU site or by Webex. Required documents and Progress Reports including status of AIs to be delivered at least five working days before the meeting • Regular bi-weekly telecons between TOU lead team and KT: • brief discussion of working progress, identified problems, needed inputs etc • the traceability of single requirements and interface management • Meeting when necessary with other Camera/Payload/PLATO teams by Webex (organised by KT). For critical topics, like I/F discussions, face to face meeting are preferable

  12. Payload Camera Subsystem Status Summary: Goals Phase B1 Goals Phase B1: To achieve a sufficient level of technical maturity to ensure a ‎successful SRR. • system requirements for the selected ‎architectures successfully validated • system requirements derived • confidence on the ‎readiness levels of various technologies.‎ • consolidating the requirements on system and subsystem level ‎and their traceability • consolidating internal interfaces, assessing requirements for ‎external interfaces • consolidating performance models • consolidating and defining operational modes of the payload and its ‎various subsystems and components. • validating the set ‎of system and subsystem requirements ‎ • Establish a verification strategy consistent with programmatic limitations and ‎required scientific value.‎ • Develop technology maturation programs in order to achieve the required TRL levels at ‎SRR

  13. Telescope Optical Unit (TOU) Status Summary: • Team?Several Institutions (INAF, Univ. Bern, Stockolm Obs., Univ. Firenze) + Industrial Partners (Selex , Medialario-Sagem, Seso, RUAG, APCO Technologies) led by INAF (Interface to Camera team) • Current Status? • Optical Design + options available • Breadboard/Prototypes: TOU AIV procedure already performed(TOU Optical and Thermal Performance) • Further Breadboard with AIV and thermal behavior identifiedAIV procedures under development with serial production in mind • Next Steps? • Answer MEMO questions

  14. Issues/questions to the TOU Team

  15. Main Phase B1 Preparation Activities Questions to/inputs from TOU team: • List of TOU team including percentage allocation for PLATO • Is there a Central point for Camera document collection? • List of available technical documents: • List of MEMO Questions • Component I/Fs • Operational modes, states, and transitions • Performance models or simulators • Behavioural models or simulators • Performance wrt requirements • Model philosophy • Assumptions employed in analyses • Requirement specification • Open issues and decisions • Current risks and their mitigation strategies

More Related