270 likes | 394 Views
Why are private pension assets in South Africa declining?. Sheshi Kaniki SASI & Momentum SASI-ERSA Savings Workshop 4 - 5 August 2009. Overview. Objectives of the paper Why are pension assets important? Literature review Trend in pension assets Reasons for trend in pension assets
E N D
Why are private pension assets in South Africa declining? Sheshi Kaniki SASI & Momentum SASI-ERSA Savings Workshop 4 - 5 August 2009
Overview • Objectives of the paper • Why are pension assets important? • Literature review • Trend in pension assets • Reasons for trend in pension assets • Conclusions
Objectives of the paper • To examine the trend in private pension assets from 1998 to 2008 • To investigate reasons for this trend • To provide policymakers and practitioners with an evidence base for pension reform
Why are pension assets important? • Have a positive impact on retirement income • Mitigate risk of old age poverty • Promote financial sector development • Mobilise domestic resources for fixed investment • Contribute to economic development
Definitions of pension assets • Private pension assets: • Assets of self-administered funds plus the assets of underwritten funds (Financial Services Board) • Assets of self-administered funds (Reserve Bank) • Self-administered funds invest their assets on their own behalf and underwritten funds operate exclusively by means of insurance policies • Official pension assets: • Assets of pension funds established by particular laws for employees of the State and some parastatal institutions (Financial Services Board)
Factors affecting accumulation of pension assets • Income (Huberman et al, 2007) • Age (Chatterjee and Zahirovic-Herbert, 2009) • Education (Arenas de Mesa et al, 2004) • Years of employment (Yuh and Devaney, 1996) • Contribution rates (Lasagabaster, 2002)
Factors affecting accumulation of pension assets • Employer contributions (Gutter et al, 2007) • Participation rates (Huberman et al, 2007) • Introduction of mandatory system (Kritzer, 2008) • Economic growth (Hu, 2005) • Exposure to equities (OECD, 2008)
Table 1: Real Value of Pension Assets (Rand Millions) Source: Author’s calculations from FSB Annual Report (various issues), Registrar of Pension Funds Annual Report (various issues) and Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin (various issues). Base year = 2000
Table 2: Pension Assets (% of GDP) Source: Author’s calculations from FSB Annual Report (various issues), Registrar of Pension Funds Annual Report (various issues) and Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin (various issues).
Figure 1: Private Pension Assets (% of Total Pension Assets) Source: Author’s calculations from FSB Annual Report (various issues) and Registrar of Pension Funds Annual Report (various issues)
Figure 2: Assets of Private Self-Administered Pension and Provident Funds (% of GDP) Source: Authors calculations from Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin (various issues).
Income Figure 3: Real GDP Per Capita Source: Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin (various issues) Base year = 2000
Employment Table 3: Employment Trends in the Public and Private Sector Source: Authors calculations from the Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin (various issues)
Stock market performance Figure 4: Growth in Value of Shares and Private Self-Administered Pension and Provident Funds (% Change) Source: Author’s calculations from the Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin (various issues).
Participation rates Table 4: Pension Participation by Sector (%) Source: Masilela and Kaniki (2009)
Participation rates continued… Figure 5: Official and Private Pension Fund Membership (% of Total Membership) Source: Author’s calculations from FSB Annual Report (various issues)
Participation rates continued… Figure 6: Private Pensions – Correlation between Membership and Assets Source: Author’s calculations from FSB Annual Report (various issues)
Contribution rates Table 5: Employee and Employer Pension Contributions (% of Salary) Source: Sanlam Employee Benefits Annual Survey (various issues)
Contribution rates continued… Figure 7:Private Pensions – Correlation between Contribution Rate and Assets Source: Sanlam Employee Benefits Annual Survey (various issues) and Author’s calculations from Reserve Bank Quarterly Bulletin (various issues)
Legal framework • Mandatory participation can improve participation and contributions • By law all government employees are required to join the Government Employee Pension Fund (GEPF) • The private sector does not have such a legal framework • Mandatory participation will have limited success in stimulating informal sector participation
Causality tests • Test causal effect of income and stock market performance on private pension assets • Real income growth not reflected in private pension assets • Equity markets are open to large swings as shown by financial crisis • Data for the period 1971 - 2006 • ADF tests showed the variables are stationary after first-differencing • Johansen-Juselius technique found one cointegrating relationship • Performed Granger causality tests using VECM framework • Lag exclusion tests found that four lags are required
Results of Granger causality tests Table 6: VECM Granger Causality Tests p-values are reported in parentheses *denotes rejection of the null hypothesis at 1% level of significance
Other factors • Deteriorating savings performance in SA over the study period • Lack of financial literacy – e.g. need to save; investments; changing pension environment poorly understood • Leakage – early withdrawals when employees change jobs • Declining confidence in private pension industry due to fraud/poor governance
Conclusions • As a share of GDP and as a share of total pension assets, private pension assets have declined in the last decade • In contrast, official pension assets have grown rapidly • Declining participation and contribution rates have contributed to the trend in private pension assets • Stock market performance is key for the growth of pension assets • A legal framework that makes pension participation mandatory can improve pension asset accumulation