1 / 40

Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW

Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation

grant-good
Download Presentation

Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare This research is funded by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation Presented at the National Resource Center for Child Welfare Data and Technology 8th National Child Welfare Data Conference

  2. Outline • Brief overview of federal outcome measures related to reentries. • Overview of prior research on foster care reentries. • Discussion of the population and methods used for this project. • Examination of the results. • Conclusions • Implications

  3. Outcomes, outcomes,everywhere(or why bother looking at reentry?) There have been multiple instances of federal legislation calling for the development of Child Welfare outcome measures. • Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA)

  4. Outcomes, outcomes …continued ASFA (the Adoption and Safe Families Act) mandated that outcome reports be given to Congress. • Reduce recurrence of child abuse and/or neglect, • Reduce the incidence of child abuse and/or neglect in foster care, • Increase permanency for children in foster care, • Reduce time in foster care to reunification without increasing re-entry, • Reduce time in foster care to adoption, • Increase placement stability, and • Reduce placements of young children in group homes or institutions.

  5. Outcomes, outcomes …continued • Statewide Data Indicators in Child and Family Services Reviews (a subset of the Annual Outcomes) • We want to ensure that children are in safe and stable homes. Reentering care is a sign that the reunification was not optimal.

  6. Foster Care Reentries Of all the children who entered care during the year under review, what percent re-entered foster care within 12 months of a prior foster care episode? National Standard 8.6% or less:

  7. Foster Care Reentries Does not follow children through care from their initial entry to the reunification and then to reentry. The federal measure does not look at reentries after 12 months even though Reentry continues to occur well after 12 months. Longitudinal alternative:For all children who enter care and are reunified, what % reenter within 3 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo after reunification?

  8. Previous Research on Reentry to Care Authors and Articles Courtney, Mark E. (1994). "Factors Associated with the Reunification of Foster Children with Their Families." Social Service Review68 (1): 81-108 Festinger, T. (1994). Returning to Care: Discharge and Reentry into Foster Care. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America. Frame, L., Berrick, J.D., Brodowski, M.L.  (2000) “Understanding reentry to foster care for reunified infants.”  Child Welfare, 79 (4), pp. 339-369 . Frame, L., (2002) “Maltreatment reports and placement outcomes for infants and toddlers in out-of-home care.”  Infant Mental Health Journal, 23 (5), pp. 517-540 . Wells, Kathleen and Shenyang Guo (1999) “Reunification and Reentry of Foster Children.” Children and Youth Services Review, 21 (4): 273-294 Wulczyn, Fred (1991). "Caseload Dynamics and Foster Care Reentry." Social Service Review65: 133-156.

  9. Research on Reentry to Care • Length of Time in Care prior to Reunification. • Type of placement a child experiences in foster care. • Number of placements while in foster care. • Race/Ethnicity of the Child. • Age of child at entry into foster care.

  10. Research on Reentry(continued…) • Reason for removal from home or entry into the foster care system. • Caregiver Drug/Alcohol use. • Poverty status (children receiving AFDC). • Marital status (single or multi-parent homes). • Geographic location (urban/rural). • Child health factors.

  11. Study Population • First Entries to Child Welfare Supervised Foster Care in California (1998-2001). • Initial stays greater than 5 days. • Children reunifying within 12 months of initial entry into foster care. • Missing placement types excluded. • Question: What are the differences between the children who reenter care within one year after reunification and those who do not?

  12. Variables Examined • Child’s Race/Ethnicity • Child’s Gender • First Entry Year • Reason for removal from home. • Time in Care prior to reunification. • Predominant Placement Type • Placement Moves

  13. Variables Examined (continued…) • Title 4e Eligible • Whether the child was found eligible for AFDC or not. • Did the parent(s) receive drug or alcohol services? • Inpatient or Outpatient Substance Abuse Services. • FP – Drug Treatment • Substance Abuse Services and Testing • 12-Step Program • Family structure child was removed from.

  14. Variables Examined (continued…) • Primary language spoken at home. • Number of placement moves while in foster care. • Entry Rates at the census tract level. • Population characteristic (census tract). • Percent Female Headed Households • Percent Below Poverty. • Percent Unemployed.

  15. Note: California child population is 7% Black, 35% White, 44% Hispanic 10% Asian/Other, 0.5% Native American, 3.5% two or more.

  16. Gender characteristics Reunification 49% 51% Reentries 48% 52%

  17. Overall Population of children who reunified by First Entry Year

  18. Results • Sibling correction was used allowing for the inclusion of all siblings in a sibling group. • Adjustments in standard errors made by using GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations) as part of a logistic regression analysis. • Adjusts the standard errors to account for potential correlation due to clustered data – in this case due to sibling groups.

  19. Limitations • The data for this study is based on an administrative data system. • Measures of drug/alcohol services only examine recommended services, not whether the services were used.

  20. Models Used • Bivariate analysis • Interim model • Does not account for community indicators, poverty indicators, or services • Full model • Contains all of the variables discussed earlier

  21. White Full Model Bivariate Interim Model 1.00 1.00 1.00 Black 1.13 1.33 ns Hispanic 0.86 ns 0.84 Asian ns 0.65 0.68 Native American ns ns ns Other 0.35 0.31 0.29 Odds of Reentry - Ethnicity

  22. Neglect Bivariate Full Model Interim Model Physical Abuse 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sexual Abuse 0.74 ns 0.77 Other Abuse 0.72 ns 0.74 ns ns ns Odds of Reentry – Reason for Removal

  23. 0-3 Months Bivariate Full Model Interim Model 3-6 Months 1.00 1.00 1.00 6-9 Months ns 0.73 0.85 9-12 Months 0.62 0.51 0.63 0.63 0.52 0.65 Odds of Reentry – Length of time in Care

  24. Age 0 Bivariate Full Model Interim Model Age 1-5 1.00 1.00 1.00 Age 6-10 0.88 0.90 0.89 Age 11-18 0.84 0.88 0.87 0.88 ns ns Odds of Reentry – Age at Entry

  25. Kinship Care Interim Model Full Model Bivariate 1.00 Foster Care 1.00 1.00 FFA 1.48 1.32 1.34 Court Spec. 1.35 1.25 1.29 Group ns ns ns Shelter 1.35 1.38 1.23 1.21 Guardian 1.44 ns ns ns ns Odds of Reentry – Predominant Placement

  26. Title 4e Eligible Bivariate Full Model Drug/Alcohol Services 2.01 2.14 Single Parent 2.32 2.33 Primary Language 1.19 1.16 Placement Moves 0.56 0.65 ns ns Odds of Reentry – Other Factors

  27. Percent Female Headed Household Bivariate Community Model 1.01 Percent Below Poverty 1.01 Entry Rate ns 0.99 Percent Unemployed 1.10 1.08 ns ns Odds of Reentry – Other Factors, pt 2

  28. Conclusions • When variables measuring poverty, drug and alcohol services, and marital status are added into the model – ethnicity is not a significant predictor of reentry. • Gender is not a significant predictor of reentry. • A longer stay in care initially is protective. (The shorter the initial stay in care the higher the likelihood of reentry).

  29. Conclusions (continued…) • The older a child is at first entry the less likely they are to reenter compared to infants. • Compared to kinship care, different predominant placement types increase a child’s odds of reentry. • Children who are 4e eligible are over 2X more likely to reenter care than non-4e eligible children.

  30. Conclusions (continued…) • Children whose parent(s) are assigned drug/alcohol services are over 2X more likely to reenter care than other children. • Coming from a primarily non-English speaking home is protective. Children from primarily non-English speaking homes are 2/3 as likely to reenter care. • For every 1% increase in the pct of female headed households in the census tract there is 1.01X the odds of reentering care.

  31. Conclusions (continued…) • For every 10 per 1,000 increase in the entry rate at the Census Tract level there is 1.08X increase in the odds of reentering foster care. • Gender, Entry Year, Number of placement moves, Percent Below the Poverty Line and Percent Unemployed were not significant predictors of reentry.

  32. Implications • For children in care for only a short period of time - post-reunification services should be available for at least 12 months. • Workers need to be aware of how severe of an effect poverty has on children's risk of entry/reentry. • Formalized coordination with drug/alcohol services, and mental health services are needed.

  33. The End! Center for Social Services Research Web Page http://cssr.berkeley.edu/CWSCMSReports Terry V. Shaw – tvshaw@berkeley.edu (510) 643 - 2585

More Related