1 / 23

Sorghum Aphid Management with Harvest Aids: Transform and Sivanto at 14 d PHI

This presentation discusses the use of harvest aids in combination with industry standards Transform and Sivanto to manage sugarcane aphids on sorghum. The study examines the movement of aphids to sorghum heads and the impact on harvest issues, grain loss, and delays. It also explores the efficacy of insecticide application and potential management strategies.

grasser
Download Presentation

Sorghum Aphid Management with Harvest Aids: Transform and Sivanto at 14 d PHI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Key Question #2: How can harvest aids be used in combination with the industry standards, Transform and Sivanto, when applied at a 14 d PHI? Robert Bowling Texas A&M University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting Dallas, TX January 3 – 4, 2017

  2. Collaborators

  3. Introduction • Sugarcane aphid on sorghum leaves during application of harvest aids frequently move to sorghum head • SCA activity on sorghum heads may result in honeydew accumulations and present harvest issues/grain loss/harvest delays • Key question: How can harvest aids be used in combination with the industry standards, Transform and Sivanto, when applied at a 14 d PHI?)

  4. Materials & Methods • University research farms or grower fields • Randomized complete block design or as replicated strips • Data Collected • Number SCA on upper and lower leaves • Number of aphids/head • Timing: 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after application • Rate grain heads for presence and severity of honeydew • Light: honeydew is present and easily visible in parts of the head, but no sooty mold and few cast skins • Moderate: honeydew is present throughout the head, with cast skins and sooty mold in patches • Heavy: all or most of the head is covered with honeydew, sooty mold, and cast skins • Make observations on amount of grain lost (kernels on the ground) and collect data if appropriate.

  5. Materials & Methods

  6. Nick SeiterUniversity of Arkansas

  7. Nick SeiterUniversity of Arkansas

  8. Nick SeiterUniversity of Arkansas

  9. Nick SeiterUniversity of Arkansas

  10. Nick SeiterUniversity of Arkansas

  11. Jeff GoreMississippi State University

  12. Jeff GoreMississippi State University

  13. Jeff GoreMississippi State University

  14. Jeff GoreMississippi State University

  15. Key Learnings • SCA is a frustrating research subject! • Rapid movement by SCA following NaClO3 application/rapid plant desiccation? • SCA did move to head when RU used as defoliant or no harvest aid applied • Aphids were successfully controlled and movement to the head was minimized when insecticide applied (Sivanto or Transform)

  16. Next Steps • What is the threshold for sugarcane aphids at hard dough/maturity?

  17. Discussion • Written Management suggestions (possibly a short publication) needed to help sorghum producers manage late-season SCA on sorghum. • Is there value in a Harvest Aid Management document? • What information should be included (i.e. insecticide rates, SCA populations worthy of a late-season/harvest aid tank mix, PHI’s are obvious, other info)? • Can this document be a single offering for all sorghum production regions or should it be region specific?

  18. Discussion • Is there value in a Harvest Aid Management document? • What information should be included (i.e. insecticide rates, SCA populations worthy of a late-season/harvest aid tank mix, PHI’s are obvious, other info)? • Can this document be a single offering for all sorghum production regions or should it be region specific?

  19. Extra Slides • Monticello, AR trial design • Randomized complete block, 4 replicate blocks arranged in columns, plots 4 rows x 40 feet with 2 rows unsprayed border • Variety AgVenture AV7R21 planted 25 April (90,000 seeds per acre, 38-inch row spacing) • Treatments applied 15 August using self-propelled Mudmaster multi-boom sprayer • 10 plants per plot with colonies of aphids on the flag leaves were marked with flagging tape prior to treatment • Marked plants in plots were sampled 19 Aug., 22 Aug., 25 Aug, 29 Aug. • Harvested 29 August

  20. Robert BowlingTexas A&M University Upper Leaf - F4,12= 0.86 P = 0.5160 Lower Leaf – F4,12 = 1.04 P = 0.4270

  21. Robert BowlingTexas A&M University Upper Leaf - F4,12= 1.75 P = 0.5160 Lower Leaf – F4,12 = 0.76 P = 0.5737

  22. Robert BowlingTexas A&M University Upper Leaf - F4,12= 0.62 P = 0.6589 Lower Leaf – F4,12 = 1.52 P = 0.2590

  23. Extra Slides • Corpus Christi, TX trial design • Randomized complete block, 4 replicate blocks arranged in columns, plots 4 rows x 40 feet with center 2 rows sprayed • Variety Pioneer 84P80 planted 10 March (55,000 seeds per acre, 30-inch row spacing) • Treatments applied 24 August using hand-held CO2 sprayer • TT 11015 nozzle tips • 10 plants per plot with colonies of aphids on plants were marked with flagging tape prior to treatment • Marked plants in plots were sampled 23 June, 27 June, and 1 July. • Plot area was not harvested because aphids never moved to head.

More Related