1 / 77

Fashion Institute of Technology

Fashion Institute of Technology. Campus Climate Assessment Results of Report. April 22-23, 2013. Climate In Higher Education.

gratia
Download Presentation

Fashion Institute of Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fashion Institute of Technology Campus Climate Assessment Results of Report April 22-23, 2013

  2. Climate In Higher Education Barcelo, 2004; Bauer, 1998, Kuh & Whitt, 1998; Hurtado, 1998, 2005; Ingle, 2005; Milhem, 2005; Peterson, 1990; Rankin, 1994, 1998, 2003, 2005; Rankin & Reason, 2008; Smith, 2009; Tierney, 1990; Worthington, 2008

  3. Assessing Campus Climate Rankin & Reason, 2008

  4. Campus Climate & Students 1 Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, 2005 2 Cabrera, Nora, Terenzini, Pascarella, & Hagedron, 1999; Feagin, Vera & Imani, 1996; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991. 3 Hale, 2004; Harper & Quaye , 2004; Harper, & Hurtado, 2009; Hurtado, 2003.

  5. Campus Climate & Faculty/Staff 1Settles, Cortina, Malley, and Stewart, 2006 2Sears, 2002 3Silverschanz, Cortina, Konik, & Magley, 2007; Costello, 2012

  6. Projected Outcomes

  7. Setting the Context for Beginning the Work

  8. Overview of the Project

  9. Instrument/Sample

  10. Survey Limitations

  11. Method Limitation

  12. Results Response Rates

  13. Who are the respondents?

  14. Response Rates by Position

  15. Student Response Rates

  16. Faculty Response Rates

  17. Staff Response Rates

  18. Results Additional Demographic Characteristics

  19. Respondents by Racial/Ethnic Identity (n)(Duplicated Total)

  20. Respondents by Racial/Ethnic Identity (n)(Unduplicated Total)

  21. Respondents by Gender Identity and Position Status (n) 4 respondents identified as transgender, but given the small “n” are not included in subsequent gender analyses

  22. Respondents by Sexual Identity and Position Status (n)

  23. Respondents with Conditions that Substantially Affect Major Life Activities

  24. Respondents by Spiritual Affiliation

  25. Students by Class Standing (n)

  26. Students’ Family Income by Dependency Status (n)

  27. Students’ Primary Methods for Paying for FIT

  28. Manners in Which Students Experienced Financial Hardship

  29. Students’ Residence

  30. Time Students Expect to Spend at FIT to Complete Degrees (n)

  31. Findings

  32. “Comfortable”/ “Very Comfortable” with:

  33. Comfort With Overall Climate and Department/Work Unit

  34. Comfort with Class Climate for Students

  35. Least Comfortable with Classroom Climate for Faculty

  36. Employees’ Overall Satisfaction

  37. Employee Overall Satisfaction

  38. Challenges and Opportunities

  39. Experiences with Harassment

  40. Form of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 304). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  41. Personally Experienced Based on…(%)

  42. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to University Status (%) (n=174)¹ (n=26)² (n=35)¹ (n=12)² (n=18)¹ (n=7)² (n=25)¹ (n=10)² (n=48)¹ (n=22)² (n=4)¹ (n=0)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  43. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Gender Identity (%) (n=214)¹ (n=30)² (n=81)¹ (n=10)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  44. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Racial Identity (%) (n=145)¹ (n=44)² (n=122)¹ (n=5)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  45. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Sexual Identity (%) (n=49)¹ (n=19)² (n=203)¹ (n=6)² ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  46. Overall Personal Experiences of Perceived Offensive, Hostile, or Intimidating Conduct Due to Disability Status (%) (n=209)¹ (n=77)¹ ¹ Percentages are based on total n split by group. ² Percentages are based on n split by group for those who believed they had personally experienced this conduct.

  47. Location of Perceived Harassment Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 304). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.

  48. Source of Perceived Conduct by Position Status (n)

  49. What did you do?1 Personal responses: • Was angry (42%) • Felt embarrassed (36%) • Did nothing (36%) • Told a friend (35%) Reporting responses: • Didn’t report it for fear their complaints would not be taken seriously (12%) • Didn’t know who to go to (10%) • Did report it but didn’t feel the complaint was taken seriously (9%) • Made complaints to campus officials (5%) 1 Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 304). Respondents could mark more than one response

  50. Unwanted Sexual Contact at FIT

More Related