260 likes | 414 Views
MULTIPLE REGRESSION. OVERVIEW. What Makes it Multiple? Additional Assumptions Methods of Entering Variables Adjusted R 2 Using z-Scores. WHAT MAKES IT MULTIPLE?. Predict from a combination of two or more predictor (X) variables.
E N D
OVERVIEW • What Makes it Multiple? • Additional Assumptions • Methods of Entering Variables • Adjusted R2 • Using z-Scores
WHAT MAKES IT MULTIPLE? • Predict from a combination of two or more predictor (X) variables. • The regression model may account for more variance with more predictors. • Look for predictor variables with low inter-correlations.
Multiple Regression Equation • Like simple regression, use a linear equation to predict Y scores. • Use the least squares solution.
Assumptions for Regression • Quantitative data (or dichotomous) • Independent observations • Predict for same population that was sampled • Linear relationship
Assumptions for Regression • Homoscedasticity • Independent errors • Normality of errors
ADDITIONAL ASSUMPTIONS • Large ratio of sample size to number of predictor variables • Minimum 15 subjects per predictor variable • Predictor variables are not strongly intercorrelated (no multicollinearity) • Examine VIF – should be close to 1
Multicollinearity • When predictor variables are highly intercorrelated with each other, prediction accuracy is not as good. • Be cautious about determining which predictor variable is predicting the best when there is high collinearity among the predictors.
METHODS OF ENTERING VARIABLES • Simultaneous • Hierarchical/Block Entry • Stepwise • Forward • Backward • Stepwise
Simultaneous Multiple Regression • All predictor variables are entered into the regression at the same time • Allows you to determine portion of variance explained by each predictor with the others statistically controlled (part correlation)
Hierarchical Multiple Regression • Enter variables in a particular order based on a theory or on prior research • Can be done with blocks of variables
Stepwise Multiple Regression • Enter or remove predictor variables one at a time based on explaining significant portions of variance in the criterion • Forward • Backward • Stepwise
Forward Stepwise • begin with no predictor variables • add predictors one at a time according to which one will result in the largest increase in R2 • stop when R2 will not be significantly increased
Backward Stepwise • begin with all predictor variables • remove predictors one at a time according to which one will result in the smallest decrease in R2 • stop when R2 would be significantly decreased • may uncover suppressor variables
Suppressor Variable • Predictor variable which, when entered into the equation, increases the amount of variance explained by another predictor variable • In backward regression, removing the suppressor would likely result in a significant decrease in R2, so it will be left in the equation
Suppressor Variable Example • Y = Job Performance Rating • X1 = College GPA • X2 = Writing Test Score
Suppressor Variable Example • Let’s say Writing Score is not correlated with Job Performance, because the job doesn’t require much writing • Let’s say GPA is only a weak predictor of Job Performance, but it seems like it should be a good predictor
Suppressor Variable Example • Let’s say GPA is “contaminated” by differences in writing ability – really good writers can fake and get higher grades • So, if Writing Score is in the equation, the contamination is removed, and we get a better picture of the GPA-Job Performance relationship
Stepwise • begin with no predictor variables • add predictors one at a time according to which one will result in the largest increase in R2 • at each step remove any variable that does not explain a significant portion of variance • stop when R2 will not be significantly increased
Choosing a Stepwise Method • Forward • Easier to conceptualize • Provides efficient model for predicting Y • Backward • Can uncover suppressor effects • Stepwise • Can uncover suppressor effects • Tends to be unstable with smaller N’s
ADJUSTED R2 • R2 may overestimate the true amount of variance explained. • Adjusted R2 compensates by reducing the R2 according to the ratio of subjects per predictor variable.
BETA WEIGHTS • The regression weights can be standardized into beta weights. • Beta weights do not depend on the scales of the variables. • A beta weight indicates the amount of change in Y in units of SD for each SD change in the predictor.
Example of Reporting Results of Multiple Regression We performed a simultaneous multiple regression with vocabulary score, abstraction score, and age as predictors and preference for intense music as the dependent variable. The equation accounted for a significant portion of variance, F(3,66) = 4.47, p = .006. As shown in Table 1, the only significant predictor was abstraction score.
Choosing Stats Participants who have recently experienced a relationship breakup complete a measure of subjective well-being as well as a personality inventory and a questionnaire asking about the length and intensity of the relationship. The researcher hypothesizes that neuroticism will explain additional variance in subjective well-being on top of that variance accounted for by length and intensity of the relationship.