160 likes | 255 Views
Learning by using CAF several times. Presentation according to the CAF criteria. Strategy and Planning. Leadership. Human Resources Management. Process and Change Management. External Partnerships and Resources. Customer/Citizen- Oriented Results. Impact on Society.
E N D
Learning by using CAF several times Presentation according to the CAF criteria Strategy and Planning Leadership Human Resources Management Process and ChangeManagement External Partnerships and Resources Customer/Citizen-Oriented Results Impact on Society People (Staff)Results Key PerformanceResults
Criterion 2: Strategy and Planning Develop, review and update strategy and planning annual quality plan annual evaluation of target commitments with stakehoder representatives agreement on target commitments in co-operation with staff members(top down and bottom up) develop and implement system of key indicators
Criterion 2: Strategy and Planning The Annual Quality Plan Structured according to CAF focus areas Objectives per focus area Each objective Assignment Stakeholder Measures Evaluation Priorisation per objective Follow-up based on audits
Criterion 2: Strategy and Planning Implement strategy and planning in the whole organisation Benchmarking and benchlearnig – use all available possibilities Annual application of CAF by project team Internal audit by municipal management External audit by certification institute
Criterion 2: Strategy and Planning Implement strategy and planning in the whole organisation Closed (quality) management cycle Audit results are objectives in the next year‘squality plan
Closed Management Cycle – PDCA - Cycle
Criterion 6: Customer / Citizen-Orientated Results How do we maximize utility of the results of our customer satisfaction measurements?
Internal questionnaire in Turkish
customer/citizen satisfaction Internal survey External survey Key representatives Qualitative customer survey
Criterion 6: Customer / Citizen-Orientated Results The Qualitative Customer Survey Comprehensive interview by external assesor using predefined methods and evaluation with interpreter if needed
Criterion 6: Customer / Citizen-Orientated Results Benchmarking – we compare ourselves to, and learn from internal customer surveys customer surveys in other cities CAF network -2003 comparison with a Slovenian administration
Criterion 9: Key Performance Results Have we achieved our goals? Staff satisfaction and customer satisfaction Staff Customer
Criterion 9: Key Performance Results Have we achieved our goals? Staff satisfaction and customer satisfaction Instead of up to eight weeks:less than one hour Cost per case have been reducedfrom € 71 to € 54
Criterion 9: Key Performance Results Have we achieved our goals? Positive perception in practically all media and a non-issue in day-to-day politics or in recent elections Evaluation and benchmarking of the model by international universities -Salzburg University Hannover University Cottbus Universitiy of Technology
Summary What have we learned from the repeated application of CAF? CAF is suitable for newcomer and advanced quality managers Creation of quality awareness and developing a culture of permanent improvement Realistic plan for annual improvements Rigorous application of the PDCA cycle to achieve a management model that meets the requirements of TQM, ISO, ...