150 likes | 319 Views
THE FUTURE SIZE AND SHAPE OF UK HIGHER EDUCATION. THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES PESENTATION BY NIGEL BROWN, NIGEL BROWN ASSOCIATES 14 OCTOBER 2008. PHASE 2 OF THE STUDY. The Impact of demographic change in different student markets Demography is not enough
E N D
THE FUTURE SIZE AND SHAPE OF UK HIGHER EDUCATION THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES PESENTATION BY NIGEL BROWN, NIGEL BROWN ASSOCIATES 14 OCTOBER 2008
PHASE 2 OF THE STUDY • The Impact of demographic change in different student markets • Demography is not enough • Scenario planning and key uncertainties • Scenarios • Opportunities • Threats • Final thoughts (with limited hindsight)
IMPACT OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN DIFFERENT STUDENT MARKETS • Full-time undergraduates • 73% entrants aged 17-21 • Over 71% of total fte of HE • Very high proportion of total public funding for HE • Potentially significant impact on demand • Part-time undergraduates • Majority aged 30+ • Around 10% of total fte • Public funding largely confined to funding council grants • Modestly positive impact on demand • Full-time and part-time postgraduate • Varied age profile – some full-time entrants straight from graduation • 19% of total fte of HE • Public funding limited except for those supported by research Councils • Uncertain impact on demand • International (non-EU students)
DEMOGRAPHY IS NOT SUFFICIENT • Past experience of the impact of demographic change • Demography more uncertain than in the past because of the impact of migration • Other factors – especially changes in the socioeconomic mix of the young population also impact on demand • Other uncertainties
Scenario Planning • Scenario planning is not forecasting the future • It is about providing a framework for considering the key threats and opportunities identifying in an uncertain world • Three stage process: • Identifying major drivers for change • Facilitated development of a small number of different scenarios based on key uncertainties • Drawing out the threats and opportunities
Major Drivers for Change in Higher Education Over the Next Twenty Years • Funding for individuals and institutions – economic conditions and competition for public and private (individual and employer)funds • Increased competition from providers outside the UK higher education sector – overseas universities, FE colleges, private providers with capital to invest • Changing labour market demands as the nature of employment changes, brokered perhaps through increased employer engagement
Scenario Planning: Identified Drivers for Change • Level of economic growth • Public funding of HE • Cost pressures on Institutions • Quality of provision • Changes in pre-18 education and training • Student and employer demand • Changing aspirations • Internationalisation • Impact of technology on learning • Levels of flexibility • The nature of the HE workforce and HR management in the sector • Future of the HEIs as we have known them • Divergence of the four UK systems
Scenario 1: “Slow Adaptation to Change” • Essentially assumes that demand changes in line with the demographic projection (no new sources of demand emerge) and total funding on average falls as numbers fall • Institutions will respond by seeking to increase their share of the total numbers – increased competition • Some retrenchment will occur, leading to possible reductions in quality and to mergers as institutions seek to keep their costs in line with income
Scenario 2 – “Market driven and competitive” • Increased competition for students and funding in all student markets both between traditional HEIs and with new providers • Driven by this competition the shape of the sector changes very significantly with a smaller number than now of large institutions and a much larger number of small niche providers, including a wide range of private providers • Increased competition with employers for 18 year olds with Level 3 qualifications
Scenario 3 “Employer driven flexible learning” • Driven by the full flowering of technological based learning, the development of a full credit accumulation and transfer system and reductions in public and individual funding, a much higher proportion of students than now study part-time and on a virtual basis while they are working • The distinction between part-time and full-time study for financial support purposes has been abolished • Co-funding by funding councils and employers is the mainstream funding route • A much greater stratification of the sector than now
Opportunities • Expansion of activities where you have a strong market position • Identification and exploitation of new markets • Increased engagement with schools • Further development of partnerships with non-traditional providers covering investment and delivery • Increased collaboration between universities in expensive, difficult to recruit areas • Increased engagement with employers
Threats • Loss of financial sustainability in the face of decreased public and/or private investment and increased costs. Successful risk management becomes increasingly challenging • Increased public regulation • Increased external competition in all student markets (including from employers for able 18 year olds) • Lack of investment in technology based learning • Increased global competition for academic staff as ‘baby boomers’ retire • Loss of reputation of the UK higher education system
Future Shape of the Sector • All three Scenarios suggest significant change in the shape of the sector over the next twenty years • Fewer large, multi-purpose institutions than now • Increased partnership and collaborative working with a wider range of partners than currently • More small specialist providers operating in niche markets • Such institutional change may require increased intervention by the funding bodies as in Wales now
Some final thoughts • Work on these scenarios took place nearly a year ago • The economic climate is much more difficult than it was then. The current economic crisis seems less and less likely to be merely a blip on the path of economic growth. It will have global repercussions for higher education • Despite the apparent Political consensus on the importance of higher education we almost certainly underestimated the potential impact of economic decline and political change • The scenarios may be overly benign but that does not limit their value as a means of identifying potentially major threats and we had the advantage of being able to use two widely different demographic projections to underpin our work