180 likes | 290 Views
Integrated VLSI Systems EEN4196 Title: 4-bit Parallel Full Adder. Group: 17 Name: Shaun Prakash (1061107216) Jai Prakash (1061105253) Rajendran (1061105607). Introduction Design Methodology Schematic Diagram Simulated Result Layout Conclusion. Contents. Introduction.
E N D
Integrated VLSI Systems EEN4196 Title: 4-bit Parallel Full Adder Group: 17Name:Shaun Prakash (1061107216)Jai Prakash (1061105253)Rajendran (1061105607)
Introduction Design Methodology Schematic Diagram Simulated Result Layout Conclusion Contents
Introduction 4-bit Parallel Full Adder
Introduction 4-bit Parallel Full Adder Binary Addition and Operation
In our full adder design, we are using the 0.35 µm CMOS technology. So the length of the transistor we fixed to 0.35 µm. L = 0.35 µm The default ratio of W to L W/L = 3 So, we design the width of the NMOS 2.5 times its length WN = 0.35 µm x 3 = 1.05 µm As the width of the PMOS is 2 times the width of NMOS, hence WP = 1.05 µm x 2 = 2.1 µm Transistor Sizing
Schematic Diagram Schematic Diagram of Full Adder
Schematic Diagram Schematic Diagram of 4-bit Parallel Full Adder
Output for First Block Simulation Result
Output for Second Block Simulation Result
Output for Third Block Simulated Result
Output for Fourth Block Simulated Result
Simulated Result Power Dissipation • As temperature increases, power dissipation increases
Propagation Delay • Proportional • As the temperature increases, the propagation delay increases Due to degradation of carrier mobilities when the temperature is increased. Simulated Result
Layout Layout of One Full-Adder Block
Same transistor types are grouped together less complex design. • To reduce the total size occupied. reduce power consumption. • The rule of thumb technique reduce the collision between metal routings and to reduce the complexity during top-level design. Layout Technique
Transistor count: 112 (28 per full adder circuit) • Layout area: 163.4µm x 227.1µm • Power dissipation (27oC): 5.0536mW Conclusion
In conclusion, the schematic designed in this project is acceptable, at which the performance and delay is under reasonable range. The design can be considered as successful, due to the adequate precision and low power consumption. Future improvement on the current design is possible to achieve higher performance. Conclusion