E N D
Comparison of Waste Heat Driven & Electrically Driven Cooling Systems for High Temperature, Off-grid Application Christopher Horvath April 20th, 2012 Center for Environmental Energy Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742-3035
Outline • Background • Motivation & Objectives • Literature Review & Approach • Technology • Legacy System • Absorption Systems (AS) • Anti-crystallization Approaches • Modeling in EES • TRNSYS Modeling • Results • Conclusions • Future Work
Project Motivation [1] • Off-grid location requirements • Electricity • Cooling • High fuel consumption issues • Safety • Reliability • How to reduce this fuel consumption? • Combined heat and power (CHP)
Project Objectives • Investigate CHP alternatives which: • Reduce fuel consumption • Reduce weight & volume • Meet the design criteria
Design Point Conditions Picture References: [2] – [4]
Design Conditions Non-Cooling (Hotel power) Electricity Runs ~ 24 hrs 0.75 kW – 4.6 hrs 1.5 kW – 7.25 hrs 2.25 kW – 7.25 hrs 3 kW – 4.6 hrs
Design Conditions Weather profile (Meteonorm data) [4a] • Abu Dhabi, UAE • Hottest week, Aug 13th - 20th (+7°C)
Design Conditions Weather profile (Meteonorm data) • Abu Dhabi, UAE • Full Year (+7°C, between 3,960 & 6,840 hours)
Design Conditions Cooling load: • 5.275 kW at 51.7°C • Derived value for transient conditions • 2 occupants • Electrical equipment in cooling space • Ventilation, infiltration, and solar/conduction
Outline • Background • Motivation & Objectives • Literature Review & Approach • Technology • Legacy System • Absorption Systems (AS) • Anti-crystallization Approaches • Modeling in EES • TRNSYS Modeling • Results • Conclusions • Future Work
Lit Review Thermally activated cooling technologies [5a] • Adsorption, absorption, solid/liquid desiccant cooling systems LiBr/Water AS flexible applications [5b] • Consistent COP • Limited by crystallization • Suggestions: pressurized absorber, cascaded, additives [5c] Commercial availability • Yazaki ACH-8 (Additives) [5d] • Rotartica (Mechanical enhancement) [5e]
Approach Typical genset configuration (10 kWe) Powers VCS Alternative configuration (5 kWe) Powers Absorption System
Modeling Approach Simulation summary
Modeling Approach • Absorption system • Water/LiBr, air-cooled HXs • Utilizes engine exhaust heat • Address crystallization issue • Model overall systems in TRNSYS [6a] • Supporting components • Load profiles • Weather profiles • Characterize cooling system • Model in EES [6b] • Provide curve fits
Outline • Background • Motivation & Objectives • Literature Review & Approach • Technology • Legacy System • Absorption Systems (AS) • Anti-crystallization Approaches • Modeling in EES • TRNSYS Modeling • Results • Conclusions • Future Work
Legacy System • Vapor compression system (VCS) • EES modeled • Design point COP – 1.06 • Physically based on AirRover model ULCR24BA [7]
Legacy System 10 kW Genset Design point electricity ~ 8 kW
AS Technology Overview [8] “Absorption Chillers and Heat Pumps” Absorption chillers Water/LiBr Simple case, 2 pressure levels Solution circulation and refrigerant circulation Desorber – driving heat input Evaporator – cooling
Outline • Background • Motivation & Objectives • Literature Review & Approach • Technology • Legacy System • Absorption Systems • Anti-crystallization Approaches • Modeling in EES • TRNSYS Modeling • Results • Conclusions • Future Work
Crystallization Characterization Tcond . . msol Tabs Crystallization (Boryta 1970) Tevap [9] Gluesenkamp et al. (2011)
Anti-crystallization: CPA • Compressor-pressurized absorber prevents crystallization: • Pressure ratio of 2.3 • Parasitic electrical power ~ 250 W • Challenges: • Finding a suitable compressor • Separating the evaporator/absorber unit for compressor inclusion
Anti-crystallization: SSLC • Separate sensible and latent cooling (SSLC) • Strategy • Small supplemental VCS • Split AS evaporator for 2 streams • Raise AS evaporator pressure • Removes crystallization • ISHPC 2011 paper [10] • Design temperature – 49°C • High COP – 2.91 • Low load – 446 W • Challenges: • Changing one variable (i.e. percent ventilation) changes everything else • Appropriate control strategy • Not pursued further
Anti-crystallization: Cascaded • Strategy • Small supplemental VCS • Raise AS evaporator pressure • Advantages • Avoids crystallization • Small temperature lift <10°C • Small pressure ratio ~ 2 • High COP ~ 6.4 • Requirements • Water loop and pump • Bypass loop & extra HX • Electrical load ~ 800 W
Anti-crystallization: MIAE • Membrane Integrated Absorber Evaporator • Strategy • Replace evaporator/absorber unit with membrane based unit • Requirements • Proprietary design • Water loops • Extra pump power consumption • Extra HXs [11]
Outline • Background • Motivation & Objectives • Literature Review & Approach • Technology • Legacy System • Absorption Systems • Anti-crystallization Approaches • Modeling in EES • TRNSYS Modeling • Results • Conclusions • Future Work
Baseline Absorption System Baseline absorption system • AS, engine, duct burner (DB) • Does not include anti-crystallization strategy
Baseline Absorption System Inputs • Model based on textbook example [8] • Air-cooled HXs • HX UA values specified • Desorber temperature limited – 135°C • AS evaporator temperature – 16°C • Solving method - DB on or off • DB off – 4 kW heat input, 2.3 kW cooling • Curve fits • COP, DB on & off • Parasitic power, DB on & off • Solution inlet temperature to desorber
Baseline Absorption System Parasitic loads AS, pumps & fans [16-20] – 482 W DB fuel pump [15] – 150 W
Baseline Absorption System Curve fits • TableCurve 3D [21] • Functions of • Ambient temperature • Engine exhaust temperature (indicates part load)
Cascaded Absorption System Modified from baseline AS EES model Water loop and pump Supplemental VCS Bypass loop (below 45°C) AS evaporator T raised – 20°C Higher evaporator load – 6 kW
Cascaded Absorption System Supplemental VCS Modified from Legacy VCS Included as EES module COP - 6.4 Power input ~820 W
Cascaded Absorption System HX diagram for water loop AS evaporator heated Chilled water cooled, then heated VCS condenser cooled
Cascaded Absorption System HX diagram for VCS evaporator VCS refrigerant heated Air side cooled
Cascaded Absorption System Parasitic loads Additional water loop pump [22] Supplemental VCS ~ 820 W Duct burner pump – 150 W
MIAE Absorption System Modified from baseline AS EES model 2 water loops and pumps 2 additional internal pumps
MIAE Absorption System Parasitic loads 2 Additional water loop pumps [23] – [25] 2 Internal pumps Duct burner ~150 W
AS’s Overall Comparison Effectiveness definition [8]
Outline • Background • Motivation & Objectives • Literature Review & Approach • Technology • Legacy System • Absorption Systems • Anti-crystallization Approaches • Modeling in EES • TRNSYS Modeling • Results • Conclusions • Future Work
Engine Component [26] – [27] Experimental engine performance for component basis Rated air temperature of 35°C DRS power solutions 3 kW Genset Engine – Yanmar L70
Engine Component • Engine – Yanmar L70 [28] • 3600 RPM fixed speed • 320 cc/revolution • 4 cycle, air-cooled, • Volumetric η = 85% • Constant air density of 1.075 kg/m3 • Fuel density: 832 kg/L, LHV: 43 MJ/kg • Resulting exhaust flow rate – 0.00908 kg/s for 3 kW engine • Exhaust scaled linearly – 0.03027 kg/s - 10 kW
Model Verifications One week, steady state simulation Rough calculations:
Model Verifications Rough calculations
Outline • Background • Motivation & Objectives • Literature Review & Approach • Technology • Legacy System • Absorption Systems • Anti-crystallization Approaches • Modeling in EES • TRNSYS Modeling • Results • Conclusions • Future Work
Results – Fuel Consumption *Baseline AS does not contain anti-crystallization approach Tmargin = 12K, and Xmargin = 1.05% concentration