1 / 12

Utilities and CSX April 30, 2008

Utilities and CSX April 30, 2008. Topics. Permitting Utilities Construction Activities Contacts. Permitting Utilities. New Form Project Review Process Overview Timeframes Helpful Hints Top 10 Rejections HDD Requests Review Hazards Samples. New Form.

guiliaine
Download Presentation

Utilities and CSX April 30, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Utilities and CSXApril 30, 2008

  2. Topics Permitting Utilities Construction Activities Contacts

  3. Permitting Utilities New Form Project Review Process Overview Timeframes Helpful Hints Top 10 Rejections HDD Requests Review Hazards Samples

  4. New Form • Single form for wirelines / pipelines • Guided instructions • Budgeting data • Feedback needed

  5. Project Review • Applications and CSXT Specifications located at: http://www.csx.com/?fuseaction=general.csxp_lease • Application process for utilities • Complete application package sent to CSXT • application, drawings, location photos, engineering review fee • CSXT reviews proposal • location, specification adherence, safety • Upon approval, an agreement and checklist are prepared and sent to applicant • Signed agreements and checklist items are returned to CSXT • CSXT signs agreements and returns an original along with information for construction scheduling.

  6. Project Review • Target Review Timeframes • Average 60 days for standard installation • What can cause a review to take longer? • Volume of requests (359 new 2008 projects in Florida to date) • Incomplete application packages • Requests for variances from CSXT Specifications • Directional bore request • Pipelines larger than 30 inches in diameter • Not providing existing agreement numbers when making modifications to existing facilities • Uncased installations

  7. Project Review • Helpful hints • Make sure application and drawings are as complete as possible • Send the application, drawings (up to size 11x17), and review fee together in one package • Provide any additional location information available • distances from nearest road, photos, aerial maps with proposed location marked, latitude/longitude • When modifying an existing facility, include the following: • existing agreement number • show any existing facility on the drawings, label as existing, and provide intended actions taking place with existing facilities (being removed, remaining, etc.) • bold the proposed modifications • if relocating, show distance from existing facility to new proposed location

  8. Project Review • Top 10 reasons plans are not approved at first review • Right-of-way dimensions not shown for railroad and streets • Jack and Bore pits not shown on plan and profile drawings • Distance from bore pits to closest track not provided • Shut off valve location not provided or unacceptable • Depth or height dimensions not provided or unacceptable • Method of installation not clear • Actual field conditions/profile not shown • Insufficient location information provided • Length of the proposed facility not provided • Angle of facility in comparison to the track

  9. HDD Requests • Directional Bore Review • Must provide additional information at time of application • Boring Plan • Fracture Mitigation Plan • Contractor Profile • Engineering review fee $2,500.00 • Profile drawings should accurately depict directional bore • Show entry and exit points and provide distances from these points to the centerline of the nearest track • Engineering review takes longer due to additional approvals required from senior engineers

  10. Construction Activities • Roadway worker regulations • Flagman to comply and protect • On scene “eyes” to detect issues, safety and/or track structure • CSXT coordinators/inspectors • Compliance w/ approved installation methods • Safety training

  11. Contacts • Project Scheduling • Shawn Schieler Flagging Coordinator 904.633.1513 OP_Request@csx.com • Project Coordination • Diah Lones Project Specialist 904.633.1560 Diah_Lones@csx.com Application/permit requests Dona Jadwin Contract Specialist 904.633.1108 Dona_Jadwin@csx.com Principle Project Engineer Dave Elder Principal Project Engineer 904.633.4523 David_Elder@csx.com

  12. Questions?

More Related