1 / 18

Robust Hierarchical Mobile IPv6(RH-MIP6)

Robust Hierarchical Mobile IPv6(RH-MIP6). An Enhancement Survivability & Fault-Tolerance in Mobile IP System. Outline. Introduction Previous Work Architecture(RH-MIPv6) RH-MIPv6 Operations Failure Recovery Mechanism Performance Analysis Simulation Conclusion Reference. Introduction.

guinevere-mckinney
Download Presentation

Robust Hierarchical Mobile IPv6(RH-MIP6)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Robust Hierarchical Mobile IPv6(RH-MIP6) An Enhancement Survivability & Fault-Tolerance in Mobile IP System

  2. Outline • Introduction • Previous Work • Architecture(RH-MIPv6) • RH-MIPv6 Operations • Failure Recovery Mechanism • Performance Analysis • Simulation • Conclusion • Reference

  3. Introduction • In the HMIPv6, HAs and MAPs are two points of failure and potential performance bottlenecks. • When the accident attack such as DoS occurs in the HA or the MAP, the failure leads to the loss of network connectivty to all the MNs.

  4. Introduction (cont.) • Router Advertisement received from multiple MAPs, an MN configures two regional care-of address: • Primary RCoA (P-RCoA) • Secondary RCoA (S-RCoA)

  5. Previous Work • The work can be classified into two categories: • Redundancy-based Schemes • Refresh-based Schemes

  6. Architecture

  7. Operations in RH-MIPv6

  8. Operations in RH-MIPv6(Cont.) • Extension to the Binding Update

  9. Failure Recovery Mechanism • CN detects MAP failure • MN detects MAP failure • ICMPv6 error message • Destination unreachable • Packet too big • Time exceed • Parameter problem

  10. Failure Recovery Mechanism(cont.)

  11. Performance Analysis

  12. Performance Analysis(Cont.) • TRH-MIPV6=Te+ Tf (where CN detects MAP’s failure) TRH-MIPV6=Tg+ Th (where MN detects MAP’s failure)

  13. Simulation • Simulation model

  14. Simulation(Cont.)

  15. Simulation(Cont.)

  16. Simulation(Cont.) • Packet loss time of HMIP is about 2.2s • Packet loss time of RH-MIPv6 is about 0.9s

  17. Conclusion • Fault-tolerance and reliability are critical issues for successful deployment and operation of mobile systems. • RH-MIPv6 has faster recovery time about 60% compared with HMIPv6.

  18. References [1] D.Tipper et al., “Providing Fault Tolerance in Wireless Access Networks,”IEEE Communications Magazine, January 2002. [2] H. Soliman, C. Castelluccia et al, “Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 managemenet (HMIPv6),”IETF draft, draft-ietf-mobileip-hmipv6-07.txt [3] H. Omar et al., “Supportinf for Falt Tolerance in Local Registration Mobile IP Systems,”MILCOM, 1998. [4] Rajib Ghosh, George Varghese, “Fault-Tolerant Mobile IP,”Washington University Technical Report WUCS-98-11, 1998. [5] Cisco Co.Ltd, “Mobile IP Home Agent Redundancy,” http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120n ewft/120t/120t2/haredun.htm. [6] S. Knight, D. Weaver et al.,” Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol,” IETF RFC 2338.

More Related