1 / 16

Analysis of aCORN Data

Analysis of aCORN Data. J. E. Adelman*, M. S. Dewey†, F. Wietfeldt ‡, G. Darius‡, G.L. Jones*, B. Collett *, and R. Kosar * August 2012. * Hamilton College, Clinton NY † The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD ‡ Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.

gunnar
Download Presentation

Analysis of aCORN Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis of aCORN Data J. E. Adelman*, M. S. Dewey†, F. Wietfeldt‡, G. Darius‡, G.L. Jones*, B. Collett*, and R. Kosar* August 2012 * Hamilton College, Clinton NY † The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD ‡ Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.

  2. Background: Neutron Decays • Free neutrons undergo beta decay • Standard Model: Two constants characterize this decay • gA: axial coupling • gV: vector coupling

  3. Neutron decay has several correlation coefficients • Know any two, get gV,gA. • Know any three – test standard model • a is the electron-antineutrino correlation coefficient • Current value: -0.103 ± 0.004

  4. Background II: The aCORN Project Electron Detector • To get a, measure antineutrino and electron momentum • Proton used to infer νē • Experiment designed to give two groups • “Fast” and “Slow” protons e- e- ve p+ ve p+ Group 1 “Fast” Group 2 “Slow” Proton Detector

  5. Group Separation depends on electron energy • Result: “Wishbone” data shape “Slow” Group “Fast” Group

  6. The aCORN Apparatus • Analysis focused on four apparatus parameters 1. Electrostatic mirror voltage 2. Electron detector trim coil current 3. Proton detector size and focusing grid 4. Electron detector gain

  7. Current State of aCORN • Apparatus assembled on NCNR’s NG-6 beamline • January – March 2011: Data collection • Raw data distilled and reduced prior to analysis • Another round with the beam – February 2012

  8. Goals: • Introduce a new calibration paradigm • Perform series by series analysis on outstanding data • Note the effects of parameter changes on calculated asymmetries • Offer suggestions for next round of data collection

  9. Part I: Calibration • Bi and Sn sources • Points of Analysis: • Resolutions • Are three Gaussians better than one? • Effect of apparatus parameters on resolutions Counts Channel Number

  10. Results • Resolutions still below expectations • Need ~ 20% • Three Gaussian: • 1% better on Sn • 2% better on Bi 975 • Curve correlated to run parameters • New Bi source shows promise of improved

  11. Part II: Series Analysis Goal: extract values for “pseudo-a”, wishbone rate, and background rate for all outstanding data.

  12. Part III: Analysis • Original Goal: Algebraic isolation of individual effects by pairwise examination • Problem: Splitting series in half gives values beyond the calculated error bars • Fallback: Single-factor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) • f-test to find correlations • Difficult to discern contributions from multiple effects

  13. ANOVA Results • Algebraic analysis indicated effects on the order of pseudo a • Evidence is consistent with a problem detecting protons

  14. Series Summary

  15. Part IV: Unanswered Questions • Missing Rate • Shape to Rate vs. Time Graph

  16. Acknowledgement I would like to thank NIST, the SURF advisors, my mentor Scott Dewey, the members of the aCORN consortium, PML’s Neutron Research group, and everyone else who helped foster an enjoyable and productive summer

More Related