280 likes | 292 Views
Learn how Intel's x86 CPU features can aid in debugging software by enabling single-stepping through code, setting breakpoints, and utilizing debug registers. Explore techniques to diagnose program failures and trace execution for effective bug identification.
E N D
Facilities for x86 debugging Introduction to x86 CPU features that can assist programmers in the debugging of their software
Any project ‘bugs’? • As you work on designing your solution for the programming assignment in Project #2 it is possible (likely?) that you may run into some program failures • What can you do if your program doesn’t behave as you had expected it would? • How can you diagnose the causes? • Where does your problem first appear?
Single-stepping • An ability to trace through your program’s code, one instruction at a time, often can be extremely helpful in identifying where a program flaw is occurring – and also why • Intel’s x86 processor provides hardware assistance in implementing a ‘debugging’ capability such as ‘single-stepping’.
The EFLAGS register 16 8 R F T F TF = TRAP flag (bit 8) By setting this flag-bit in the EFLAGS register-image that gets saved on the stack when a ‘pushfl’ is executed, and then executing ‘popfl’, the CPU will begin triggering a ‘single-step’ exception after each instruction-executes RF = RESUME flag (bit 16) By setting this flag-bit in the EFLAGS register-image that gets saved on the stack, the ‘iret’ instruction will be inhibited from generating yet another CPU exception
TF-bit in EFLAGS • Our ‘usedebug.s’ demo shows how to use the TF-bit to perform ‘single-stepping’ of a Linux application (e.g., our ‘linuxapp.o’) • The ‘popfw’ instruction is used to set TF • The exception-handler for INT-1 displays information about the state of the program • But single-stepping starts only AFTER the immediately following instruction executes
How to do it • Here’s a code-fragment that we could use to initiate single-stepping from the start of our ‘ring3’ application-progam: pushw $userSS # selector for ring3 stack-segment pushw $userTOS # offset for ring3 ‘top-of-stack’ pushw $userCS # selector for ring3 code-segment pushw $0 # offset for the ring3 entry-point pushfw # push current FLAGS btsw $8, (%esp) # set image of the TF-bit popfw # modify FLAGS to set TF lret # transfer to ring3 application
Using assembler listings • You can generate an assembler ‘listing’ of the instructions in our ‘linuxapp.o’ file, then use that listing to follow along while you’re ‘single-stepping’ through that file’s code • Here’s how to do it: $ as –al linuxapp.s > linuxapp.lst • (The ‘-al’ option is for ‘assembly listing’)
A slight ‘flaw’ • We cannot single-step the execution of an ‘int-0x80’ instruction (Linux’s system-calls) • Our exception-handler’s ‘iret’ instruction will restore the TF-bit to EFLAGS, but the single-step ‘trap’ doesn’t take effect until after the immediately following instruction • This means we ‘skip’ seeing a display of the registers immediately after ‘int-0x80’
Fixing that ‘flaw’ • The x86 offers us a way to overcome the delayed effect of TF when ‘iret’ executes • We can use the Debug Registers to set an instruction ‘breakpoint’ which will interrupt the CPU at a specific instruction-address • There are six Debug Registers: DR0, DR1, DR2, DR3 (breakpoints) DR6 (the Debug Status register) DR7 (the Debug Control register)
Breakpoint Address Registers DR0 DR1 DR2 DR3
Special ‘MOV’ instructions • Use ‘mov %reg, %DRn’ to write into DRn • Use ‘mov %DRn, %reg’ to read from DRn • Here ‘reg’ stands for any one of the CPU’s general-purpose registers (e.g., EAX, etc.) • These special instructions are ‘privileged’ (i.e., they can only be executed by code that is running in ring0)
Debug Control Register (DR7) 15 0 0 0 G D 0 0 1 G E L E G 3 L 3 G 2 L 2 G 1 L 1 G 0 L 0 Least significant word 31 16 LEN 3 R/W 3 LEN 2 R/W 2 LEN 1 R/W 1 LEN 0 R/W 0 Most significant word
What kinds of breakpoints? LEN R/W LEN 00 = one byte 01 = two bytes 10 = undefined 11 = four bytes R/W 00 = break on instruction fetch only 01 = break on data writes only 10 = undefined(unless DE set in CR4) 11 = break on data reads or writes (but not on instruction fetches)
Control Register CR4 • The x86 CPU uses Control Register CR4 to activate certain extended features of the processor, while still allowing for backward compatibility of software written for earlier Intel x86 processors • An example: Debug Extensions (DE-bit) 31 3 0 other feature bits D E CR4
Debug Status Register (DR6) 15 0 B T B S B D 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B 3 B 2 B 1 B 0 Least significant word 31 16 unused ( all bits here are set to 1 ) Most significant word LEGEND: B0 (Breakpoint by DR0) BT (Break on Task-switch trap) B1 (Breakpoint by DR1) BS (Break on Single-step trap) B2 (Breakpoint by DR2) BD (Break on Debug-register access) B3 (Breakpoint by DR3)
Where to set a breakpoint • Suppose you want to trigger a ‘debug’ trap at the instruction immediately following the Linux software ‘int $0x80’ system-call • Your debug exception-handler can use the saved CS:EIP values on its stack to check that ‘int $0x80’ has caused an exception • Machine-code is: 0xCD, 0x80 (2 bytes) • So set a ‘breakpoint’ at address EIP+2
Computing a code-breakpoint isrDBG: pushal # preserve general registers pushl $ds # preserve DS register pushl $es # preserve ES register lds 40(%esp), %esi # point DS:ESI to faulting instruction cmpb $0xCD, (%esi) # a software interrupt instruction? jne notINT # if not, don’t set a breakpoint add $2, %esi # else point past 2-byte instruction # now we want to compute the ‘linear address’ represented by # the logical-address (i.e., segment:offset values) in DS:ESI # NOTE # It’s easy for operating systems like Linux, where segments # for code and data have a base-address that’s equal to zero # but our current program-examples use memory-segments # that don’t begin at address 0x00000000
Segment-selector format 15 3 2 1 0 array-index for descriptor-table entry T I R P L TI (Table Indicator) 0 = GDT 1 = LDT
Segment-Descriptor Format 63 32 Base[31..24] G D R S V A V L Limit [19..16] P D P L S X C / D R / W A Base[23..16] Base[15..0] Limit[15..0] 0 31 Several instances of this basic ‘segment-descriptor’ data-structure will occur in the Global Descriptor Table (and maybe also in some Local Descriptor Tables)
Getting the base-address # The base-address for the memory-segment whose segment-selector is # in register DS will need to be extracted from its segment-descriptor mov %ds, %ecx # segment-selector to ECX lea theGDT, %ebx # setup GDT’s offset in EBX bt $2, %ecx # is the selector’s TI-bit set? jnc useEBX # no, do table-lookup in GDT lea theLDT, %ebx # else do the lookup in LDT useEBX: and $0xFFF8, %ecx # isolate selector’s index-field mov %cs:0(%ebx, %ecx), %eax # descriptor [31..0] mov %cs:4(%ebx, %ecx), %al # descriptor [39..32] mov %cs:7(%ebx, %ecx), %ah # descriptor [63..56] rol $16, %eax # rotate these bits into position
Enabling the breakpoint # instruction linear-address is base-address plus segment-offset add %eax, %esi # add base-address to offset # setup this breakpoint-address in Debug Register DR0 mov %esi, %dr0 # breakpoint-address in DR0 # now activate a ‘local’ code-breakpoint for the address in DR0 mov %dr7, %eax bts $0, %eax # set LE0 (Local Enable 0) mov %eax, %dr7 … popl %es popl %ds popal iret
Detecting a ‘breakpoint’ • Your debug exception-handler can read DR6 to check for an occurrence of breakpoint0 mov %dr6, %eax ; get debug status bt $0, %eax ; breakpoint #0? jnc notBP0 ; no, another cause btsl $16, 12(%ebp) ; set the RF-bit # or disable breakpoint0 in register DR7 notBP0:
Detecting a ‘breakpoint’ • Your debug exception-handler reads DR6 to learn why a debug-exception occurred # EXAMPLE # was this exception triggered by a breakpoint defined in DR0…DR3? mov %dr6, %eax # read debug status-register test $0xF, %eax # any breakpoint matches? jz notBP # no, leave RF-bit unchanged # OK, we need to set the RF-bit (Resume Flag) before we execute ‘iret’ # (so as not to immediately encounter the very same breakpoint again) btsl $16, 48(%esp) # set RF-bit in EFLAGS image notBP:
In-class exercise #1 • Our ‘usedebug.s’ demo illustrates the idea of single-stepping through a program, but after several steps it encounter a General Protection Exception (i.e., interrupt $0x0D) • You will recognize a display of information from registers that gets saved on the stack • Can you determine why this fault occurs, and then modify our code to eliminate it?
The GP Fault’s stack-layout EFLAGS ----- CS EIP error-code EAX ECX EDX EBX ESP EBP ESI EDI ----- DS ----- ES ----- FS ----- GS
Intel x86 instruction-format • Intel’s instructions vary in length from 1 to 15 bytes, and are comprised of five fields: instruction prefixes 0,1,2 or 3 bytes opcode field 1 or 2 bytes addressing mode field 0, 1 or 2 bytes address displacement 0, 1, 2 or 4 bytes immediate data 0, 1, 2 or 4 bytes Maximum number of bytes = 15 NOTE: When the processor’s IA32e mode is activated, some of these field-sizes may be larger, to accommodate additional addressing-modes and operand-sizes
A few examples • 1-byte instruction: in %dx, %al • 2-byte instruction: int $0x16 • A prefixed instruction: rep movsb • And here’s a 12-byte instruction: cmpl $0, %fs:0x400(%ebx, %edi, 2) • 1 prefix byte • 1 opcode byte • 2 address-mode bytes • 4 address-displacement bytes • 4 immediate-data bytes
In-class exercise #2 • Modify the debug exception-handler in our ‘usedebug.s’ demo-program so it will use a different Debug Register (i.e.,, DR1, DR2, or DR3) to set an instruction-breakpoint at the entry-point to your ‘int $0x80’ system-service interrupt-routine (i.e., at ‘isrDBG’) • This can allow you to do single-stepping of your system-call handlers (e.g., ‘do_write’)