1 / 49

Inspection, Search, Seizure & Arrest

Inspection, Search, Seizure & Arrest. V. Raghuraman Advocate. Inspection [Section 67(1)]. Who may conduct : Proper officer [“PO”]not below the rank of joint commissioner. When it may be conducted : Where there is a reason to believe that:

gwendolynl
Download Presentation

Inspection, Search, Seizure & Arrest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Inspection, Search, Seizure & Arrest V. Raghuraman Advocate

  2. Inspection [Section 67(1)] • Who may conduct: Proper officer [“PO”]not below the rank of joint commissioner. • When it may be conducted: Where there is a reason to believe that: • Taxable person has, with intent to evade tax, suppressed information: • Of transaction relating to supply of goods or services’ • Of stock of goods in hand; • Of claiming ITC in excess of entitlement; • Of contravention of any provisions of the Act. • Transporter/warehouse operator: • Is keeping goods on which tax has been evaded; • Has kept accounts in such manner as is likely to cause evasion. • What can be inspected: PO may authorize any other officer of central tax in writing in Form GST INS-01 to inspect: • Any place of business of taxable person/transporter/warehouse; • Any other place.

  3. Inspection – Meaning of • Per Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn: ‘Inspection’ means a careful examination of something, such as goods (to determine their fitness for purchase) or items produced in response to a discovery request (to determine their relevance to a law suit). • Per CBIC FAQs: ‘Inspection’ is a new provision under the CGST/SGST Act. It is a softer provision than search to enable officers to access any place of business of a taxable person and also any place of business of a person engaged in transporting goods or who is an owner or an operator of a warehouse or godown.

  4. Proper Officer for Inspection • Per Section 2(91) of the Act: “proper officer” in relation to any function to be performed under this Act, means the Commissioner or the officer of the central tax who is assigned that function by the Commissioner in the Board. • Per Circular 03/3/2017-GST dated 05.07.2017: Proper officer to carry out inspection u/s 67(1) is the Additional or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax.

  5. Reason to Believe – Meaning of • Section 26 IPC: A person is said to have “reason to believe” a thing, if he has sufficient cause to believe that thing but not otherwise. • ‘Reason’ – Meaning of: HL SibalVs CIT [1976] 103 ITR 606 (P&H) • Reason is a statement of fact employed as an argument to justify or condemn some act. • When information is received or facts are harnessed in support of an argument, the resultant effect assumes the shape of a reason. • Facts constituting the information must be relevant to the enquiry. They must be such from which a reasonable and prudent man can come to the requisite belief or conclusion. • Material must have rational nexus of bearing to the reasons for formation of belief. • Reason must be the basis to arrive at conclusion, i.e, by inference, deduction, etc. • When a number of reasons are considered in relation to each other, the final result of this consideration assumes the shape of a conclusion.

  6. Reason to Believe – Meaning of • ‘Belief’ – Meaning of: Rich Udyog Network Ltd Vs CCIT [2016] 386 ITR 136 (All) • Belief must be held in good faith. • It cannot be a mere pretense or a doubt. • Belief should not be based on mere suspicion but must be based on information which is in the possession of the authorizing authority. • The said “information” must be something more than a mere rumor, gossip or hunch. It must form the basis on which the authorizing officer can have “reason to believe” that an action can be taken.

  7. Judicial Review of “Reason to Believe” • Balwant Singh Vs R.D. Sharma [1969] 71 ITR 550 (Delhi) • The existence of 'reason to believe' is subject only to a limited scrutiny and the Court cannot substitute its own opinion for that of the officer carrying out Inspection. • Inspection must not lightly or arbitrarily invade the privacy of a subject. Before he acts, he must be reasonably satisfied that it is necessary to do so but the decision must still remain his and not that of the Court. • If the grounds on which reason to believe is founded are non-existent or are irrelevant or are such on which no reasonable persons can come to that belief, the exercise of power would be bad and court can interfere. • It is also open to the Court to examine whether the reasons for the belief have a rational connection or a relevant bearing to the formation of the belief. • DDIT Vs Mahesh Kumar Agarwal [2003] 262 ITR 338 (Cal) – Court cannot look into aptness or sufficiency of grounds upon which satisfaction is based. Satisfaction is subjective. If belief is bona fide and cogently supported, court will not interfere.

  8. Place of Business or Any Other Place – Meaning of • Section 2(85) CGST Act: “Place of business” includes: • A place from where the business is ordinarily carried on, and includes a warehouse, a godown or any other place where a taxable person stores his goods, supplies or receives goods or services or both; or • A place where a taxable person maintains his books of account; or • A place where a taxable person is engaged in business through an agent, by whatever name called.

  9. Search and Seizure [Section 67(2)] Search – Meaning of: • Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition: An examination of a man's house or other buildings or premises, or of his person, with a view to the discovery of contraband or illicit or stolen property, or some evidence of guilt to be used in the prosecution of a criminal action for some crime or offense with which he is charged. Seizure – Meaning of: • Law Lexicon Dictionary: The act of taking possession of property by an officer under legal process. • It generally implies taking possession forcibly contrary to the wishes of the owner of the property or who has the possession and who was unwilling to part with the possession.

  10. Search and Seizure [Section 67(2) r/w 67(11)] • Who may conduct: Proper officer not below the rank of joint commissioner. • When it may be conducted: Where there is reason to believe that the following is secreted in any place: • Goods liable for confiscation; • Documents/things/books relevant for proceedings. • What can be searched/seized: The following may be searched and seized by making an order in Form GST INS-02: • Aforesaid Goods/books/documents/things; • Accounts/registers/documents of any person produced before the PO, if PO has reason to believe that such person has evaded or is attempting to evade tax.

  11. ‘Secreted’ – Meaning of: • Durga Prasad Vs H.R. Gomes AIR 1966 SC 1209 (1216) – In the context of Section 105(1) Customs Act: • ‘Secreted’ means documents which are kept not in the normal or usual place, with a view to conceal them. • It may even mean documents or things which are likely to be secreted. • It includes, documents or things which a person is likely to keep out of the way or to put in a place where the officer of law cannot find it. • What can be called from an assessee in the normal course should not be recovered from him under search proceedings.

  12. Retention and Return of Seized Articles [Section 67(3), (7) and (8)] • Retention – For How Long: As long as it is necessary for examination / inquiry. • When to return: Those goods/documents/things which are not relied upon in the notice must be returned within 30 days of issue of notice. • Note: Notice must be issued Within 6 months of seizure unless extended further. Otherwise all goods/documents/things seized are to be returned. • Provisional return: This can be done upon: • Execution of bond and furnish security; or • Payment of tax, interest and penalty.

  13. Detention of Goods [1st Proviso to Section 67(2)] • If not practicable to seize, PO may serve owner or custodian of goods, an order in Form GST INS-03 not to remove, part with or otherwise deal with goods except with prior permission. • ‘Practicable’ – Meaning of: Om Parkash Jindal Vs UOI [1976] 104 ITR 389 (P&H) – Seizure is ‘impracticable’ when the nature or location of the property found on search which is reasonably believed to be undisclosed property and does not allow or the circumstances do not permit the immediate seizure of the same. • Order of detention cannot be issued for the purpose of finding out whether the goods are seizable or for further enquiry. • MaaVaishnavi Sponge Ltd Vs DGIT [2012] 21 ITR 413 (Orissa) • SriramJaiswalVs UOI [1989] 176 ITR 261 (All) • B.K. NowlakhaVs UOI [1991] 192 ITR 436 (Delhi)

  14. Disposal of Seized Articles [Section 67(8) & (9)] • Government may, by notification, specify goods or class of goods which shall be disposed of after seizure by proper officer. • In disposing of, regard should be had to the following factors: • Perishable nature • Hazardous nature • Depreciation in value of goods with passage of time • Constraints of storage space for goods • Any other relevant considerations. • An inventory of such goods shall be prepared by the PO after its seizure in Form GST INS-05.

  15. Applicable Provisions of CrPC Regarding Search

  16. Applicable Provisions of CrPC Regarding Search

  17. Whether assessee is entitled to a copy of reasons recorded for issuing a search warrant? • DGIT(I) Vs SpacewoodFurnitures (P) Ltd [2015] 57 taxmann.com 292 (SC): • Recording of reasons is necessary so as to ensure accountability and responsibility in the decision making process. • However, that by itself would not confer in the assessee a right to communication of the reasons for the belief at the stage of issuing of the authorization. • Any such view would be counter productive of the entire exercise contemplated in the search provisions. • It is only at the stage of commencement of the assessment proceedings after completion of the search and seizure, if any, that the requisite material may have to be disclosed to the assessee.

  18. Whether illegal search vitiates seizure and subsequent proceedings? • RadhakrishnanVs State of UP AIR 1963 SC 122: Even if search is illegal, the seizure of articles and further trial is not vitiated. If search provisions are violated, only the following two consequences could ensue: • The person whose premises is sought to be searched can, at best, resist search. • Because of the illegality of the search the Court may be inclined to examine carefully the evidence regarding the seizure. • State of MP VsPatlanMallah 2005 CrLJ 918 SC: Illegality in search does not vitiate search unless it had caused prejudice to the accused. Merely because the accompanying witness is not from the same locality, search evidence cannot be disregarded. • ACCE Vs Wilfred Sebastian 1983 (12) ELT 122 (Ker): On examination, if the evidence regarding the seizure of the articles is found to be satisfactory and acceptable, it will not be in the interests of justice to ignore altogether that evidence.

  19. Power to Seal or Break Open [Section 67(4)] • Where access is denied to: • Door of any premises, almirah, boxes, electronic devises, box, receptacle. • In which any goods, registers, accounts, documents of the person are suspected to be concealed. • Then, officer authorized for search and seizure has power to seal or break it open.

  20. Allowing to Take Photocopies [Section 67(5)] • What is allowed: To make copies of any documents which are seized or take extracts therefrom. • Who is allowed: Person from whose custody any documents are seized. • When photocopy may be taken: In presence of an authorized officer at such place and time as such officer may indicate. • When photocopy cannot be taken: In the opinion of the proper officer, it prejudicially affects the investigation.

  21. Test Purchase [Section 67(12)] • Commissioner or officer authorized may: • Cause purchase by any third person authorized by them • Of goods or services from business premises of a taxable person • Object: For the purpose of checking the issue of tax invoice or bill of supply and compliance with provisions. • After checking, officer shall return the goods purchased: • The taxable person shall refund the amount received. • And cancel the tax invoice or bill of supply.

  22. Inspection of goods in movement [Section 68] • What are the documents that are required to be carried by the person-in-charge of the conveyance ? • Rule 138 of CGST Rules: Every registered person who causes movement of goods of value exceeding fifty thousand rupees shall generate e-way bill: • in relation to a supply; or • for reasons other than supply; or • due to inward supply from an unregistered person • The e-way bill to be generated before the commencement of movement of goods and details are to be filed in Form GST EWB-01.

  23. Inspection of goods in movement [Section 68] • Rule 138A of CGST Rules: Documents are required to be carried by the person-in-charge of the conveyance: • Invoice or bill of supply • Delivery Challan • Copy of e-way bill in physical or electronic form • Consequences of non-compliance with Section 68 r/w Rule 138: General penalty under section 122(1)(xiv) will be attracted and liable to penalty of Rs. 10,000 CGST + 10,000 SGST.

  24. Detention, Seizure and Release of Goods and Conveyance in Transit [Section 129] • When goods can be detained: Where any person transports or stores any goods in contravention of provisions of the CGST Act or Rules, then the proper officer is empowered to detain or seize such goods. Questions: • Whether the non-compliance of provisions of section 68 r/w rule 138 attracts Section 129? • If so, whether penalty u/s 129 is in addition to general penalty u/s 122?

  25. Detention, Seizure and Release of Goods and Conveyance in Transit [Section 129] The proper officer shall release the goods in transit which are detained or seized upon payment of tax and penalty equivalent to or upon furnishing security : Owner comes forward Owner does not come forward Other than Exempted goods Other than Exempted goods exempted goods exempted goods 100 % of the 2% of the value tax payable or 25,000 - WIL 100% tax plus penalty at 50 % of the tax payable 5% of the value or 25,000 - WIL

  26. Detention, Seizure and Release of Goods and Conveyance in Transit [Section 129] • Notice: Proper officer is bound to issue notice in respect of detained or seized goods in transit, providing details of tax and penalty payable. • Provisional release of goods: The goods seized under section 129 will be released provisionally by the proper officer. The procedure as laid down in section 67(6) shall apply. • Deemed conclusion of proceedings: Upon payment of tax and interest under section 129(1), all the proceedings under this section shall be deemed to be concluded. • Failure to pay tax and penalty: Tax and penalty to be paid within 14 days, if not paid then the proceedings under section 130 will be initiated (liable to confiscation of goods or conveyance).

  27. Summons and Evidence [Section 70] • Who can issue summons: Proper officer being superintendent of central tax. • For what summons can be issued: For any inquiry. Such inquiry is a “judicial proceeding” within the meaning of Section 193 & 228 IPC. • Section 193 IPC: Whoever intentionally gives false evidence in judicial proceeding shall be punished with imprisonment of term which may extend to 7 years + fine. • Section 228 IPC: Insult or interruption of public servant in a judicial proceeding punishable for upto 6 months imprisonment or fine uptoRs. 1000 or both. • How summons may be issued: In the same manner as in case of a civil court as per CPC, 1908. • To whom summons can be issued: Any person whose attendance he considers necessary: • To give evidence • To produce any document or any other thing.

  28. Access to Business Premises [Section 71] • Person authorized: Any officer authorized by the proper office not below the rank of Joint Commissioner of Central Tax. • Any other persons authorized under this section: • Audit party deputed by the proper officer. • Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated u/s 66 to conduct the special audit. • Access to: Place of business of registered person. • Rights of the officer: Inspect books of account, documents, computer, computer programs and such other things as he may require which are necessary for audit, scrutiny, verification and checks necessary to protect the interest of revenue.

  29. Access to Business Premises [Section 71] • Who is person-in-charge: Can be the owner, director, partner or the employee of the organisation. • The following documents are to be made available to the proper office: • Records maintained by the registered person and declared to the proper officer • Trial balance or its equivalent • Audited statement of financial accounts • Cost Audit reports • Income Tax Audit reports • Any other relevant records • Time Limit: To be produced within 15 working days from the day of demand or within the period as extended by the proper officer.

  30. Arrest [Section 69] • Who may arrest: Commissioner may authorize proper officer • When arrest may be made: Commissioner has reason to believe that any of the following offences are committed which have the following punishments prescribed u/s 132:

  31. Procedure After Arrest [Section 69(2) & (3)] • In Cases of Non-Cognizable and Bailable Offences: Subject to CrPC • The person arrested shall be admitted to bail or in default of bail, forwarded to the custody of the Magistrate. • For the purpose of releasing an arrested person on bail, DC/AC has same powers as officer-in-charge of police station. • In Cases of Cognizable and Non-Bailable Offences: The officer authorized to arrest the person shall inform such person of the grounds of arrest and produce him before a Magistrate within 24 hours. • Incongruity within Section 69 (PV Ramana Reddy Vs UOI): Even though Section 69(1) does confer power to arrest in case of non-cognizable and bailable, Section 69(3) deals with the grant of bail, remand to custody and the procedure for grant of bail to a person accused of the commission of non-cognizable and bailable offences.

  32. Procedure After Arrest [Section 69(2) & (3)] • In Cases of Cognizable and Non-Bailable Offences: • Unlike non cognizable and bailable offence, there is no specific provision under Section 69 which provides for power and procedure to grant bail. • Does this means no bail is available OR • Whether the provisions of CrPC shall be applied to release such person on bail? • Obviously then, the provisions of CrPC would be applicable.

  33. Whether Arrest/Prosecution can Precede Assessment? – Judgments in Favour • PV Ramana Reddy Vs UOI 2019-TIOL-873-HC-TELANGANA-GST: • To say that a prosecution can be launched only after the completion of assessment, goes contrary to Section 132. • Offences mentioned in Section 132 have no co-relation to and do not depend on any assessment and adjudication. • Arrest can be made even when offence is compoundable. • Article 226 can be used as a substitute to section 438 CrPC to obtain anticipatory bail. • Special Leave to Petition against the above decision is dismissed as reported in 2019-TIOL-216-SC-GST • Same view was taken in Bharath Raj Punj Vs CCGST 2019-TIOL-678-HC-RAJ-GST.

  34. Whether Arrest/Prosecution can Precede Assessment? – Judgments Against • Jayachandran Alloys Vs Superintendent of GST 2019-TIOL-1021-HC-MAD-GST: The term ‘commits’ clarifies that the act of committal of the offence is to be fixed first before punishment is imposed. When recovery is made subject to determination in an assessment, the Revenue's argument that punishment for the offence alleged can be imposed even prior to such assessment, is clearly incorrect and amounts to putting the cart before the horse. • UoI Vs Sapna Jain 2019-TIOL-217-SC-GST – matters are referred to larger bench of the SC • UOI Vs Makemytrip India Pvt Ltd 2019-TIOL-65-SC-ST: Revenue cannot bypass Section 73A of the Finance Act, 1994 before going ahead with arrest u/s 90, 91 (arrest) of FA, 1994.

  35. PROSECUTION

  36. Offences and Prosecution-132

  37. Offences and Prosecution-132

  38. Offences and Prosecution-132

  39. Offences and Prosecution-132

  40. Meaning of Cognizable and bailable offences • CrPC: • (a)"bailable offence" means an offence which is shown as bailable in the First Schedule, or which is made bailable by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence" means any other offence • (c)"cognizable offence" means an offence for which, and "cognizable case" means a case in which, a police officer may, in accordance with the First Schedule or under any other law for the time being in force, arrest without warrant • (l)"non-cognizable offence" means an offence for which, and "non-cognizable case" means a case in which, a police officer has no authority to arrest without warrant

  41. Offence by Companies Sec 137

  42. Offence by LLP, Firm, HUF

  43. Compounding of Offences Sec 138

  44. Compounding of Offences

  45. Compounding of Offences

  46. Thank You V. RAGHURAMAN, Advocate B.Com, FCA, LLB, ACS, Grad.CWA V.Raghuraman Email id : vraghuraman@vraghuraman.in

More Related