60 likes | 183 Views
DCDC Parcel Attributes. Analysis and comparison of as-delivered parcel polygon attributes. Why?. Determine what fields are commonly in use currently Where are we at now? Is there a self-determined standard?. What?. Parcel Polygon GIS files as delivered to RMLS of MN over the past 3 years.
E N D
DCDC Parcel Attributes Analysis and comparison of as-delivered parcel polygon attributes
Why? • Determine what fields are commonly in use currently • Where are we at now? • Is there a self-determined standard?
What? • Parcel Polygon GIS files as delivered to RMLS of MN over the past 3 years.
Where? • 11 MN counties so far • MN DNR Merged Parcel Geodatabase Schema • MetroGIS Parcel Standards • National Land Parcel Data – A Vision for the Future • NSDI FGDC Cadastral Subcommittee • More needed - distribute spreadsheet?
How? • Excel Spreadsheet used as analysis tool.
Caveats • Field names vary. (i.e. PREF_TYPE vs. prefix_ty vs. preftyp) • Field data types vary. • Date/time, y/n, String, numeric, etc. • Not done yet with analysis • Need to re-analyze earlier files. • Most interested in what data is being captured and stored. • Sort and compile stats when done.