240 likes | 736 Views
Modeling The Deposit Thickness Distribution in Copper Electroplating of Semiconductor Wafer Interconnects. Eugene Malyshev 1 , Uziel Landau 2 , and Sergey Chivilikhin 1 1 L-Chem, Inc Beachwood, OH 44122 and 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University,
E N D
Modeling The Deposit Thickness Distribution in Copper Electroplating of Semiconductor Wafer Interconnects Eugene Malyshev 1, Uziel Landau 2, and Sergey Chivilikhin 1 1 L-Chem, Inc Beachwood, OH 44122 and 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH 44106 AIChE Annual Meeting,San Fransisco, CA.
Objectives • Analyze the effects of the different processparameters • Provide a convenient (for non-expert users) & comprehensive tool for: • Cell Design • Scale-up • Process Optimization
Issues in Design • Deposit- • Deposit thickness uniformity (+/- ~3% across the • wafer) • Minimal edge exclusion (<5 mm) • Deposit texture/appearance • Good gap-fill • Extreme electrical/mechanical/chemical properties • Process- • Stable • Controllable • Scalable
Parameters Analyzed • Cell Configuration (Dimensions, Edge gap, Shields) • Flow (Rotation and Convective Flow) • Seed Layer Thickness • Electrolyte Composition • Acid Concentration (Conductivity) • Reactant Concentration (Mass-Transport) • Additives (Kinetics/Polarization Curve) • Operating Parameters: Current/Voltage
Cell “Generic” configuration Base Case: r = 100 mm, gap =10 mm i = 20 mA/cm2, K= 0.55 S/cm, seed thickness = 1000A rotation = 60 rpm impinging flow = 4 gpm 60 rpm WAFER HOLDER HOLDER WAFER GAP GAP 100 mm 10 mm 10 mm Seed thickness 150 mm Applied Voltage DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm ANODE
Flow effects Rotating Disk vs. Combined Flow Flow Map: Modified Design Flow Map: Base Case Base case Delta, cm Modified Levich eqn. r/R
Numerical comparison with analytical model Model system: rotating disk, r = 7 mm, Cb = 0.28 mole/L, D = 6.7*10-6 cm2/s Cell-Design Delta, cm Levich eqn. Levich eqn. i lim, A/cm2 Cell-Design
Effect of edge-gap Wafer r = 100 mm Simulated gaps: 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm; Cb = 0.28 mole/L, D = 6.7*10-6; Impinging flow = 4 gpm 5 mm i lim, A/cm2 50 mm 100 mm 150 mm
Resistive substrate effect HOLDER GAP HOLDER WAFER WAFER GAP 100 mm 10 mm 10 mm Seed thickness 150 mm Applied Voltage DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm Seed thicknesses = 500, 1000 and 2000 Å. iaverage = 10 and 40 mA/cm2. Wafer r = 100 mm. Rotation = 60 rpm. Impinging flow = 4 gpm. Cb= 0.28 mol/L, k = 0.55 S/cm, D = 6.7*10—6cm2/s. ANODE 500 Å 1000 Å iaverage = 40 mA/cm2 2000 Å no seed resistance Current, A/cm2 500 Å iaverage = 10 mA/cm2 1000 Å no seed resistance 2000 Å
60 rpm WAFER HOLDER DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm ANODE Gap Effect of edge-gap i = 20 mA/cm2 gap = variable seed = 1000 A Gap = 0 mm Gap = 10 mm Gap = 50 mm Deposit, [micron] Deposit, [micron] Deposit, [micron] 150 sec 150 sec 180 sec 1-3 time steps = 20 sec, 4-7 time steps = 30 sec
Shield design 60 rpm 60 rpm 60 rpm HOLDER HOLDER HOLDER WAFER WAFER WAFER DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm ANODE ANODE ANODE i, A/cm2 i, A/cm2 i, A/cm2 10% variation
200 mm wafer vs. 300 mm wafer 60 rpm Seed thickness = 1000 Å. Cb= 0.28 mol/L, k = 0.55 S/cm, D = 6.7*10—6cm2/s. WAFER HOLDER GAP 200 mm wafer 100 mm deposit(r/R=1) / deposit(r/R=0) =1.646 180 sec 10 mm 150 sec 120 sec 150 mm 90 sec Deposit, micron DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 4 gpm 60 sec 40 sec 20 sec r/R 300 mm wafer 150 mm 180 sec deposit(r/R=1)/deposit (r/R=0) =1.847 150 sec 10 mm 120 sec 90 sec 150 mm Deposit, micron 60 sec 40 sec DISTRIBUTED FLOW = 9 gpm 20 sec r/R
180 sec 150 sec 120 sec 90 sec 60 sec 40 sec 20 sec Electrolyte conductivity (pH) 200 mm wafer Deposit, [micron] Deposit, [micron] k = 0.55 S/cm k = 0.055 S/cm iaverage = 20 mA/cm2 seedth = 1000 A iaverage = 20 mA/cm2 seedth = 1000 A 180 sec 150 sec 120 sec 180 sec 90 sec 150 sec 120 sec 60 sec 90 sec 60 sec 40 sec 40 sec 20 sec 20 sec r/R r/R 300 mm wafer Deposit, [micron] Deposit, [micron] k = 0.55 S/cm k = 0.055 S/cm iaverage = 20 mA/cm2 seedth = 1000 A iaverage = 20 mA/cm2 seedth = 1000 A 180 sec 150 sec 120 sec 90 sec 60 sec 40 sec 20 sec r/R r/R Low acidity High (normal) acidity
Additives effect Current density, [A/cm2] Pure copper sulfate (0.5 M, pH = 2, no additives ) With additives * r/R * - Plating from copper sulfate in the presence of 70 ppm Cl -, 50 ppm SPS and 200 ppm Polyethylene glycol [‘PEG’] - (molecular weight = 4000 )
The effects of the various process parameters have been simulated The simulated results are in general agreement with observations. Some Specifics: A proper shield design at the wafer edge significantly enhances uniformity Electrode rotation has a larger effect than the convective flow (in the practiced range) Wafer plating (macroscopic scale) does not typically operate under mass transport control The edge-gap has a major effect on the flow and the current density near the wafer edge The resistive seed effect is noticed mostly at higher current densities (~40 mA/cm2) Scaling to 300 mm enhances the non-uniformity effects, unless compensating measures are taken,. Conclusions