1 / 10

Chris Orban (OSU Physics) with David Weinberg (OSU Astronomy)

Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles: Isolating the Evolution of the BAO Peak with Power-law Initial Conditions. Chris Orban (OSU Physics) with David Weinberg (OSU Astronomy). Clustering. Time. Scale. Background. Early Universe. Late Universe. Eisenstein et al. 2005. credit: SDSS.

gyda
Download Presentation

Chris Orban (OSU Physics) with David Weinberg (OSU Astronomy)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles: Isolating the Evolution of the BAO Peak with Power-law Initial Conditions Chris Orban (OSU Physics) with David Weinberg (OSU Astronomy) Clustering Time Scale

  2. Background Early Universe Late Universe Eisenstein et al. 2005 credit: SDSS credit: WMAP Problem: How does the BAO signature change over cosmic time? How “standard” is this standard ruler? Opportunity: Largest “ruler” ever discovered – very useful for distance scale, dark energy Anchored to CMB (not LMC!) Challenge: Need to observe large cosmological volumes! Need sub-percent accurate theory for any w(z)!

  3. Strongly non-linear regime Clustering Time Linear regime Scale Initial Conditions Fourier Transform Clustering Scale Scale-1 Chris Orban – Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles

  4. Non-linear structure formation Chris Orban – Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles

  5. Simplifying the Problem Chris Orban – Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles

  6. rbao / Lbox = 1 / 20 Self-similar Bumps! !!! rbao / Lbox = 1 / 10 • Comparing results from rbao x2 simulations (e.g. rbao = 200 h-1Mpc) to previous results !!! • Because of self-similarity the bump evolution should be exactly the same as a scaling of the previous results • Can’t do this with CDM initial conditions! • Numerical effects may break self-similarity – a test more powerful and more general than convergence testing rbao / np1/3 = 100/8

  7. Fourier-space phenomenology Non-linear spectrum Small-scale model Damping PNL(k) = exp(-2k2/2) PL(k/) + A(k) Initial spectrum shift!

  8. Beyond linear-order • Many groups developing beyond-linear-order perturbation theory methods to describe BAO evolution • If successful BAO evolution for arbitrary w(z) can be computed without N-body simulations • Powerlaw setup is problematic for many of these methods – may point to better schemes PT breaks down PT valid 1-loop SPT predictions! 1-loop SPT predictions from publically-available code: http://mwhite.berkeley.edu/Copter/ (Carlson, White, & Padmanabhan 2009) Chris Orban – Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles

  9. Future Plans • Run “powerlaw” setup with   0 • Explore the broadening of the BAO feature in the halo clustering • Run simulations with a different N-body code (PKDGRAV instead of Gadget2) • Compare and develop phenomenological models to describe non-linear evolution Chris Orban – Self-similar Bumps and Wiggles

More Related