1 / 7

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ Uncoordinated Deletion of Sub-Carriers in an MB-OFDM Link ] Date Submitted: [ 11 May, 2005 ] Source: [ C. Razzell ] Company [ Philips ]

gypsy
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Uncoordinated Deletion of Sub-Carriers in an MB-OFDM Link] Date Submitted: [ 11 May, 2005] Source: [C. Razzell] Company [Philips] Address [1109, McKay Drive, San Jose, CA 95131, USA] Voice: [+1 408 474 7243], FAX: [], E-Mail:[charles.razzell@philips.com] + [Chiara Cattaneo] Company [STMicroelectronics NV] Address [39, Chemin du Champ-des-Filles, 1228 Geneva, Plan-les-Quates, Switzerland] Voice: [+41 22 929 29 94], FAX: [], E-Mail:[chiara.cattaneo@st.com] Re: [MB-OFDM Spectrum Flexibility] Abstract: [Simulated PER performance with uncoordinated sub-carrier erasures ] Purpose: [Answer some “no” comments questioning the practicality of implementing sub-carrier deletion as an interference mitigation technique. This document provides an indication of the robustness of the receiver to deletion of sub-carriers] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. C. Razzell (Philips), C. Cattaneo (STM)

  2. Introduction • The following comments were received as part of the reason for not confirming MB-OFDM as the TG3a down-selections • No data have been presented on how "nulling" tones or OFDM symbols impacts link performance (especially at the critical rate of 480 Mbps for USB-type applications) • The following simulation results are intended to address this issue specifically. C. Razzell (Philips), C. Cattaneo (STM)

  3. Recap of MB-OFDM Spectrum Flexibility • Ability to comply with worldwide regulations: • Channels and tones can be turned on/off dynamically to comply with changing regulations. • Can arbitrarily shape spectrum in software with a resolution of ~4 MHz. C. Razzell (Philips), C. Cattaneo (STM)

  4. CM1 PER performance @ 53.3Mbps C. Razzell (Philips), C. Cattaneo (STM)

  5. CM1 PER performance @ 200Mbps C. Razzell (Philips), C. Cattaneo (STM)

  6. CM1 PER performance @ 480Mbps C. Razzell (Philips), C. Cattaneo (STM)

  7. Summary • Different numbers of adjacent sub-carriers were nulled {1,2,4,8 or 16} • The worst case, as expected was 480Mbps and 16 sub-carriers nulled • However, even with 16 x 4.125=66MHz of spectrum cut away, the required SNR increased by less than 1dB C. Razzell (Philips), C. Cattaneo (STM)

More Related