210 likes | 328 Views
BIODIGESTER Conceptual Design Review December 7 th , 2009 EGGN 491. Team Members Keano Dashkowitz Faculty Advisor: Lynlee Gerk Dr. David Munoz Alima Kopbayeva Elliot Makuh Jennifer Stevens Daniel Stewart. Contact: Maria Camp Mission:
E N D
BIODIGESTER Conceptual Design Review December 7th, 2009 EGGN 491
Team Members Keano Dashkowitz Faculty Advisor: Lynlee Gerk Dr. David Munoz Alima Kopbayeva Elliot Makuh Jennifer Stevens Daniel Stewart
Contact: Maria Camp Mission: “Into Your Hands improves rural communities of Uganda by developing financially sustainable solutions for affordable education.” Contact: Bob Miller Mission: “To improve the life and environment of orphans of any race, religion or gender throughout the world.” Clients
Project Objectives Design biodigester system to provide • Gas for cooking fuel • Fertilizer for crops • Look at community and residential size units • Increase sustainability and use of green energy
Design Considerations • Solid Retention Time • Temperature • pH • Dilution • Reduce Ammonia toxicity • Maintaining anaerobic state • Production of Toxins
Schematic Gas Pipe Ground Level
Concept Variants • Design Variables • Tank dimensioning and geometry • Hydraulic residence time is needed to be long enough for methane formers to grow • Cover material and type • Anaerobic is necessary • Mixer use and type • 10%-15% increase of gas • Grinder use and placement • Storage unit possibilities • Effluent of gas and fertilizer • Gas burn-off mechanism • Safety reasons
Design Criteria • Amount of biogas produced • Cost • Safety • Sustainability • Cultural Acceptance
Mixers Paddle Mixer
Mixers Spiral Mixer
Grinders • Placement • Before influent pipe • Inside influent pipe
Patent Research • Earliest Related US Patent: 1920 • Interesting Patents • US Patent #3,981,803 (September 21, 1976) • Basic Bio-digester • US Patent #4,100,023 (July 11, 1978) • Four-chambered Bio-digester • US Patent #4,374,199 (February 15, 1983) • Bio-digester with Magnetic Field • US Patent #6,361,694 (March 26, 2002) • Improved Efficiency with Propane Injections
Decision mechanisms • Pugh Chart • Decision Matrix • Brain Ball • 6-3-5