1 / 19

PS/RtI Project SAPSI Training

PS/RtI Project SAPSI Training. January 2011. Advanced Organizer. Project background Implementation Integrity Importance Process integrity SAPSI Discuss items Administration procedures. 2. Florida PS/RtI Project. Two purposes of PS/RtI Project

hadassah
Download Presentation

PS/RtI Project SAPSI Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PS/RtI Project SAPSI Training January 2011

  2. Advanced Organizer • Project background • Implementation Integrity • Importance • Process integrity • SAPSI • Discuss items • Administration procedures 2.

  3. Florida PS/RtI Project Two purposes of PS/RtI Project • Evaluate the impact of PS/RtI on educator, student, and systemic outcomes in pilot sites implementing the model • Statewide training in PS/RtI Personnel • Project Leader and Regional Coordinators • Provided training, technical assistance (TA), and support to pilot schools, districts, and PS/RtI Coaches • Collected data for program evaluation purposes • PS/RtI Coaches • Employees of districts • Provided training, TA, and support to pilot schools and districts • Collected data for program evaluation purposes • Project Evaluators • Provided training, TA, and support to Regional Coordinators and Coaches to facilitate data collection 3.

  4. Participants • 2000+ educators from 7 demonstration districts • 34 pilot schools • 27 comparison schools • Districts and schools vary in terms of • Geographic location • Student demographics • District size: 6,200 – 105,000 students 4.

  5. PS/RtI Training Curriculum & Procedures Overview 13 six-hour sessions delivered over 3 years Provided to School-Based Leadership Teams 5-4-4 day sequence over 3 years Topics included: rationale for implementing PS/RtI, systems change principles, 4 steps of problem solving, multi-tiered model of services 4 stage professional development model employed Days of training staggered for TA and Coaching activities to occur between Training and support provided to PS/RtI Coaches by Project Initial 5-day coach training provided Meetings with Coaches occurred 2 x per year Coaching activities informed by multiple data sources 5.

  6. Tiered Model of School Supports & the Problem-Solving Process ACADEMIC and BEHAVIOR SYSTEMS Tier 3: Intensive, Individualized, Interventions. Individual or small group intervention. Tier 2: Targeted, Strategic Interventions & Supports. More targeted interventions and supplemental support in addition to the core curriculum and school-wide positive behavior program. Tier 1: Core, Universal Instruction & Supports. General instruction and support provided to all students in all settings. Revised 10.07.09 6.

  7. Change Model Consensus Infrastructure Implementation 7.

  8. Stages of Implementing Problem-Solving/RtI • Consensus • Belief is shared • Vision is agreed upon • Implementation requirements understood • Infrastructure Development • Regulations • Training/Technical Assistance • Model (e.g., Standard Protocol) • Tier I and II intervention systems • E.g., K-3 Academic Support Plan • Data Management • Technology support • Decision-making criteria established • Implementation 8.

  9. Data Sources Quantitative • Implementation Integrity • SAPSI • ProductReviews • Observations • Skill assessments • Surveys • Beliefs • Perceived Skills • Coaching Evaluation Qualitative • Interviews • Regional Coordinators • PS/RtI Coaches • District Liaisons • Principals • TOTs • Anecdotal conversations 9.

  10. Research Evaluation Difference Between Evaluation & Research “Prove” “Improve” Lower Certainty Higher Relevance Higher Certainty Lower Relevance 10.

  11. INTEGRITY AND THE SAPSI 11.

  12. What is “Integrity”and why is it important? • Integrity is the degree to which something was done the way it was intended to be done. • When a process or procedure lacks “integrity”, few if any assumptions can be made about the outcome or impact of that process or procedure. 12.

  13. Systems Change Process Integrity • Change model used included 3 stages • Consensus • Infrastructure • Implementation • Activities expected to occur within each stage • Extent to which those activities occurred = integrity of change process 13.

  14. SAPSI • School-Based Leadership Team (SBLT) members report progress on activities • Consensus • Infrastructure • Implementation • Completed as a team • Coach facilitates agreement • 27 items • 4-point scale • Not Started • In Progress • Achieved • Maintained 14.

  15. Item Review • You should have the following in front of you: • Copy of the SAPSI • SAPSI technical assistance document (turn to p. 26) • We will briefly review each item • Please ask questions when something is not clear 15.

  16. 16.

  17. 17.

  18. SAPSI Administration Procedures • You should have the following in front of you: “Self-Assessment of Problem Solving Implementation (SAPSI) Administration Summary: 2010-11 School Year” document • We will review administration procedures including: • Who completes the SAPSI • Scale used • When it is due • Procedures for shipping completed SAPSIs to the Project 18.

  19. Additional Data Sources-Integrity • Implementation Integrity • ProductReviews • Observations • Interviews 19.

More Related