180 likes | 332 Views
IQER. Developmental Engagement Recommendations Not published Summative Review Assessed, confidence, limited confidence, no confidence Published. IQER. Original Dates Notified in June of the dates SE – 8 th August 2008 DE – 24 th October 2008 SR – Spring 2010. IQER. Revised dates:
E N D
IQER • Developmental Engagement • Recommendations • Not published Summative Review • Assessed, confidence, limited confidence, no confidence • Published
IQER • Original Dates • Notified in June of the dates • SE – 8th August 2008 • DE – 24th October 2008 • SR – Spring 2010
IQER • Revised dates: • SE – September 8th 2008 • Student submission October 2008 • DE – 1st and 2nd December 2008 • SR – Spring 2010
IQER • Responsibilities • Line of enquiry 1 – Reg Davies • Line of enquiry 2 – Julie Bellfield • Line of enquiry 3 – Val Keeling • Curriculum areas: • Reg Davies – Science and Theatre Studies • Julie Bellfield – Life-long learning Education & Early Years • Val Keeling – Engineering • Nigel Hall – Business and Management, Accounting, Sport
IQER • Agenda • Initial meeting – July • Lines of enquiry agreed • Draft SE sent to Co-ordinator and Universities • SE posted on ARCS – 8th September 2008 • Notification from QAA that DE could proceed – 17th September 2008 • Written review of the SE sent to Nigel – 25th September 2008
The Journey • Agenda (contd) • Summary of the SE report posted on ARCS, with requirements for additional information and further evidence needed at the DE. • Preparatory meeting – 30th September
The Journey • In the beginning…. • 4 day training to be reviewers • Writing the 3 lines of enquiry • Writing the SE • Writing the HE Strategy - Rewriting of the college policies to include higher education • Student submission
The Journey • Writing of the SE • All programme leaders involved in forming the lines of enquiry • Distributed to HEIs before final submission for comments
The Journey • Meetings with staff/students • To formulate the lines of enquiry • Presentations given to College Directors. SMT, programme leaders. • ‘Frequently Asked Question’ sheet circulated to all HE staff. • Student submission • Presentation by Co-ordinator to staff and student reps.
The Journey • Communication • Monthly HE meetings for staff to disseminate good practice and to support staff on new programmes. • Use of Moodle for students and staff (HE common room, HE staff room} • COORDINATOR CONSTANTLY IN TOUCH
The Journey Student submission Submitted by mid October • Circulated question sheet regarding assessment to all students • 2/3 student reps wrote the submission from these comments.
The Journey The Event • Reviewers: Val Keeling – college nominee/facilitator Julie Bellfield – College Nominee Nigel Hall – Co-ordinator Reg Davies – External Reviewer
The Journey • Organisation of the 3 meetings • Staff meeting • Student meeting • HEIs quality unit/link tutors/programme leaders/marketing/resources/MIS
The Journey • The Event • Getting the base room ready • Acting as Reviewers • Writing the report • Writing the action plan
The Journey Meetings: • First morning –staff 2. Afternoon – Students 3. 2nd morning – universities, programme leaders, employers
The Journey • What they liked – why was it a success? • Self Evaluation report • HE Strategy • Team work – Staff/students/HEIs • VLE • HE Academic Board and the HE SAR • ORGANISATION
Happy Ever After? Results • 10 areas of recommendation • No essential recommendations • 1 advisable • 3 desirable