1 / 11

Support schemes for renewable energy in the Nordic countries

Support schemes for renewable energy in the Nordic countries. Jouni Tolonen. Backround. Why renewable energy? Mitigation of CO2 and other emissions Security of supply (self-sufficiency, diversification) Development of new energy technology Employment and local economic development

hagop
Download Presentation

Support schemes for renewable energy in the Nordic countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Support schemes for renewable energy in the Nordic countries Jouni Tolonen JT

  2. Backround • Why renewable energy? • Mitigation of CO2 and other emissions • Security of supply (self-sufficiency, diversification) • Development of new energy technology • Employment and local economic development • Sustainable development • Support schemes are needed because in general renewable energy sources (RES) are not competitive in the market • How the goals can be reached cost-efficiently and with mimimum market distortion? JT

  3. Power supply in the Nordic countries in 2004 Source: Nordel JT

  4. Indicative targets in the RES-E Directive JT

  5. Support schemes for RES • Feed-in-tariffs (fixed price or premium) • Quotas + tradable green certificates • Investment aid • Tax incentives • Taxation of fossil fuels in heat production • R&D support • CO2 emission trading JT

  6. Basic features of support schemes Government pays Customers pay Investment aid Support/price level set by authorities Amount of RES set in the market Tax support Feed-in-tariffs (fixed or premium) Tendering Support level set in the market Amount of RES set by authorities Quotas + green certificates JT

  7. Main RES support schemes in EU countries Many countries use different schemes simultaneously investment aid, tax incentive feed-in-tariffs quota + green certificates tendering JT

  8. Support schemes in the Nordic countries • Denmark • Feed-in-tariff for wind (premium ≈13 €/MWh+market price) • Feed-in-tariff for biogas (fixed ≈80 €/MWh) • Tendering for off-shore wind farms • Support was higher before 2003 • Norway • Investment aid for wind (10-20 %) • Tax support for wind (5.7 €/MWh) was terminated in 2004 • Possibly a joint green certificate market together with Sweden in the future • Iceland • No support for RES JT

  9. Support schemes in the Nordic countries • Finland • Investment aid (0-40 %), 25 million € in 2004 • Tax support (4.2 or 6.9 €/MWh), 32 million € in 2004 • Possibly reduction of RES support in emission trading sectors • Sweden • Green certificate + quota • 7.4 % in 2003  16.9 % in 2010 • ≈24 €/MWh, ≈250 million € in 2004 • Production support (Miljöbonus) for wind until 2009 • ≈11 million € in 2005 • On-shore ≈10 €/MWh • Off-shore ≈17 €/MWh • Changes to green certificate system under consideration JT

  10. Support for new renewable electricity generation Source: Nordenergi JT

  11. Nordenergi concludes that well constructed support schemes for renewable energy should: • Not interfere in a negative way with the electricity or the CO2-markets • Level the playing field – international coordination of effects of different support schemes might be needed in order to achieve equal subsidy levels • Be predictable and transparent – credibility and political stability are important for investments • Be cost efficient - minimize costs to the energy consumer, energy companies and public expenses • Not be directed towards specific technologies – renewable technologies should compete with each other and a support scheme should therefore be technology neutral. This could be complemented by specific support to R&D for emerging technologies. • Not create bureaucracy JT

More Related