900 likes | 1.19k Views
COMPETITION. Krebs cpt. 12; pages 179-205. 1. DEFINITIONS 2. INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Effects of density on individuals a. growth Linum usitatissimum Limpets b. form and reproduction Corn cockle Lolium perenne genets and ramets (pages 117-119)
E N D
COMPETITION Krebs cpt. 12; pages 179-205
1. DEFINITIONS 2. INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Effects of density on individuals a. growth Linum usitatissimum Limpets b. form and reproduction Corn cockle Lolium perenne genets and ramets (pages 117-119) ii. Effects of density on populations a. growth (rate) Law of constant final yield Growth rate of Rana tigrina b. mortality 3/2 power law of self thinning
3. INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Theory Lotka-Volterra (pages 180-182) Tilman (pages 182-185) ii. Examples (pages 185-199) salamanders (pages 80-81) bedstraws barnacles(Fig 7.9; pages 94-95) Yeast (pages 187-189); Paramecium (page 190) diatoms (Fig. 12.6; page 186)
4. CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITION i. Ecological a. distribution barnacles (Fig 7.9; pages 94-95) Typha ii. Evolutionary a. niche differentiation (pages 190-192; Fig 12.20) b. competitive ability (pages 199-201) c. character displacement (page 201-202) d. competitive release
COMPETITIONoccurs when an organism uses more energy to obtain, or maintain, a unit of resource due to the presence of other individuals than it would otherwise do.
COMPETITION • ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS: • Two or more organisms that require a single resource that is in short supply. • The supply of that resource must be affected by its use by the consumer: • Food supply • Pollinators • Nest space etc.
COMPETITION • ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS: • Two or more organisms that require a single resource that is in short supply. • The supply of that resource must be affected by its use by the consumer: • Food supply • Pollinators • Nest space etc.
COMPETITION • The contest for that resource reduces the fitness of one or both competitors. • Competing organisms may be the: • Same INTRASPECIFIC • Different INTERSPECIFIC • Organisms may compete by: • EXPLOITATION • INTERFERENCE
1. DEFINITIONS etc. 2. INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Effects of density on individuals a. growth Linum usitatissimum Limpets b. form and reproduction Corn cockle Lolium perenne genets and ramets (pages 117-119) ii. Effects of density on populations a. growth (rate) Law of constant final yield Growth rate of Rana tigrina b. mortality 3/2 power law of self thinning
1. DEFINITIONS etc. 2. INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Effects of density on individuals a. growth Linum usitatissimum Limpets b. form and reproduction Corn cockle Lolium perenne genets and ramets (pages 117-119) ii. Effects of density on populations a. growth (rate) Law of constant final yield Growth rate of Rana tigrina b. mortality 3/2 power law of self thinning
1. DEFINITIONS etc. 2. INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Effects of density on individuals a. growth Linum usitatissimum Limpets b. form and reproduction Corn cockle Lolium perenne genets and ramets (pages 117-119) ii. Effects of density on populations a. growth (rate) Law of constant final yield Growth rate of Rana tigrina b. mortality 3/2 power law of self thinning
1. DEFINITIONS etc. 2. INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Effects of density on individuals a. growth Linum usitatissimum Limpets b. form and reproduction Corn cockle Lolium perenne genets and ramets (pages 117-119) ii. Effects of density on populations a. growth (rate) Law of constant final yield Growth rate of Rana tigrina b. mortality 3/2 power law of self thinning
3. INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Theory Lotka-Volterra (pages 180-182) Tilman (pages 182-185) ii. Examples(pages 185-199) salamanders (pages 80-81) bedstraws barnacles(Fig 7.9; pages 94-95) Yeast (pages 187-189); Paramecium (page 190) diatoms (Fig. 12.6; page 186)
READING FOR THESE LECTURES: Krebs: Scan cpt.11, especially pp. 160-162 Krebs: Cpt. 12, especially 180-184
Start with the logistic equation. In populations that have overlapping generations, the logistic curve is described by the logistic equation (Krebs 161):
The Lotka-Volterra equations, which describe competition between organisms, are based on the logistic curve. Each of these two equations shows the effect of intra-specific (within a species) competition only. (Krebs 180)
Suppose 10 individuals of species 2 have the same inhibitory effect on an individual of species 1 as does a single individual of species 1. Then the TOTAL competitive effects ON species 1 (intra and inter-specific) will be equivalent to: (N1 + (N2/10)) species 1 individuals 1/10 (in the case of this example) is the COMPETITION COEFFICIENT and is called .
The COMPETITION COEFFICIENT …. , is the per capita competitive effect ON species 1 OF species 2. ,is the per capita competitive effect ON species 2 OF species 1 is. (see footnote in Krebs p182)
So the total inhibitory effect of individuals of species 1 (intra-specific force) and species 2 (inter-specific force) on the growth of population 1 will be: in which N2 converts N2 to a number of “N1 equivalents” (Krebs p181, eq. 12.3)
Removing the inner brackets: Krebs p181 Thus there are two “sources of slowing” for the growth of species 1: 1. its own density, and 2. the density of the second species weighted by the second species’ relative impact.
For species 2, we have the equivalent formulation: Krebs p181 These two constitute the Lotka-Volterra model - a logistic model for two species.
Now we wish to determine the conditions under which each population would be at equilibrium, that is the conditions under which dN/dt would be zero. In some cases only one population will be able to achieve an equilibrium stable density, and in other cases both can. (Krebs p182-183)
For Species 1 • All the space for species 1 is used up when there are: • K1 ind. of sp.1 • K1/ind. of sp. 2 • i.e. dN1/dt = 0 Along the isocline dN1/dt = 0 Krebs: Fig 12.1 p182
All the space for species 2 is used up when there are: • K2 ind. of sp.2 • K2/ind. of sp. 1 • i.e. dN2/dt = 0 For Species 2 Along the isocline dN2/dt = 0 Krebs: Fig 12.2 p182
3. INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION i. Theory Lotka-Volterra (pages 180-182) Tilman (pages 182-185) ii. Examples(pages 185-199) salamanders (pages 80-81) bedstraws barnacles(Fig 7.9; pages 94-95) Yeast (pages 187-189); Paramecium (page 190) diatoms (Fig. 12.6; page 186)
THE RESOURCE RATIO HYPOTHESIS (OF PLANT SUCCESSION) David TILMAN
TILMAN, D. 1985. The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession.American Naturalist 125:827-852 READING FOR THESE LECTURES: Krebs: selections from pp. 182-186
Evelyn G. HUTCHINSON: • Why are there so many kinds of animals? • Because there are so many different kinds of food to eat. • Why are there so many kinds of plants? • Water, CO2, light, nutrients • Ratios of resources (light and nitrogen)
Evelyn G. HUTCHINSON: • Why are there so many kinds of animals? • Because there are so many different kinds of food to eat. • Why are there so many kinds of plants? • Water, CO2, light, nutrients • Ratios of resources (light and nitrogen)
Evelyn G. HUTCHINSON: • Why are there so many kinds of animals? • Because there are so many different kinds of food to eat. • Why are there so many kinds of plants? • Water, CO2, light, nutrients • Ratios of resources (light and nitrogen)
Evelyn G. HUTCHINSON: • Why are there so many kinds of animals? • Because there are so many different kinds of food to eat. • Why are there so many kinds of plants? • Water, CO2, light, nutrients • Ratios of resources (light and nitrogen)
Evelyn G. HUTCHINSON: • Why are there so many kinds of animals? • Because there are so many different kinds of food to eat. • Why are there so many kinds of plants? • Water, CO2, light, nutrients • Ratios of resources (light and nitrogen)
Resource Ratio Hypothesis • One species and one resource • One species and two resource • Two species and two resources • Multiple species and two resources