210 likes | 361 Views
Manager’s perceptions of challenges facing migrant social workers . Dr Sue Hanna Division of Social Work Brunel University – London . The project – Back ground . UK based study - Recruited London & Home counties Aim
E N D
Manager’s perceptions of challenges facing migrant social workers Dr Sue Hanna Division of Social Work Brunel University – London
The project – Back ground • UK based study - Recruited London & Home counties • Aim • To investigate migrant social worker’s post-arrival integration, professional practice and development. • Funded by a grant from the Nuffield Foundation • Include managers perspective
Rationale • Social Work characterised politically as an essential service but beset with unresolved problems • One problem - supply and retention of staff in child and family work • Regular recruitment/ employment by local authorities of overseas trained & qualified social workers to fill staffing shortfalls(Crisp, 2009; Welbourne et al, 2007; Walsh, Wilson & O’Connor, 2009). • Strategy most apparent in statutory child protection services (Welbourne et al, 2007).
Problem statement • Transferable skills - delivery of social work services are affected by broader geographical and institutional contexts (Healy, 2005) • Experiences / motivations of immigrant social workers have not been systematically investigated. • Discussions conceptualised in terms of labour supply and basic practice readiness • Fails to appreciate the complexity and pressures of child and family practice & the psycho social impacts of immigration as workers attempt to build new lives and establish themselves professionally in the U.K • (Lee & Westwood, 1996; Casado, Hong, & Harrington, 2010).
Policy Direction – Managed Labour immigration • Significantly reduce net migration • Permanent cap on immigration outside EU • Tighten the points based system & consider other routes • Cut link between temporarily migration and permanent settlement • Increasingly less antipodeans in social work market. Growth in EU recruitment
Method • Qualitative study -50 participants • 15 managers • Snow ball sample • Semi structured individual interviews • Thematic / Comparative analysis (Attride – Stirling, J. 2001) • Thematic networks as web like illustrations that summarise the main themes comprising a piece of text.
Management sample • 15 managers – Child & Family Services • 6 overseas managers • 9 Born & trained in UK • 3 men12 women • 1 inner London borough, 2 greater London Boroughs, 2 county councils
Findings (1) – Global themes • Task- Managing International SW relatively common • Motivations - Vary from country to country • Preparedness –Shock - degree depends on country of origin • Expectations – Experience confounds people expectations
Mangers Quotes • Again I think the people who are coming from like Australia and New Zealand they tend to have the correct expectations I think they are not fazed by cases we give them. As I say I think people coming from maybe the sub continent struggle because it’s just so alien to everything they have done before, the whole court process, the fact that we challenge parents we don’t just take at face value what they say....I think that has been a struggle its the different training, it’s a different thought process.
Findings (2) • Challenges – diff cultures have diff challenges but its challenging exp for everyone • Multi systemic challenges - professionally occupationally socially emotionally practically. • Receptionby service users - Problems with language, communication and accent can compound a difficult job.
Findings (3) • Strengths – valued for motivation, diverse experiences and skills • Post arrival issues – Recognition of pressures and issues • Stay or Leave? - Most return home but if stay there are critical points /events • Induction – Not a forgone conclusion
Mangers Quotes (2) Induction • Nothing outside of what anyone else gets nothing at all. There is no attention to country of origin and maybe that’s about London because it’s such as diverse place that everyone is from somewhere and everyone has a background from somewhere and there is no attention to it.
Findings (4) • How has it been for you – Positive but hard work • Support for the role – Variable not a forgone conclusion • Particular staffing challenges – leave, internationals don’t stay, some cant adjust • Preparing teams – No specific preparation, norm turnover accepted • Acceptance – Over time- need to stay
Findings (5) • How effective as a strategy – Qualified support • Need to build our own capacity • Brings strengths but need to stay at least two years for it to be cost effective • Expensive - group recruiting & locums • Less jobs - Recruit more from Europe
Manager Quote • ‘One of the biggest benefits at the time was recruitment was very hard and we are in a different climate now and recruitment is not so hard so in that sense that was a benefit at the time and I think people from different countries different cultures bring different things and make us think about different things so that’s a benefit as well. I think if they then don’t stay very long it’s a bit of a… whether the investment is value for money it’s hard to work out really.’
Literature - International social work • International social work – may be a global profession, but not necessarily a common professional project. (Weiss-Gal & Welbourne 2008) • Form of social work practiced in a locality is structured by the welfare regime in that country and any analysis must be informed by consideration of power relationships in that given society and profession (Hugman et al, 2010) • Despite good qualifications, knowledge of theories & methods , the reality of English social work was something overseas workers had never experienced (Simpson, 2009)
Experience of migrant professionals • Knowledge transfer via mobility not a given (Dominelli, 2010) • Arrivals positioned as learners rather than co learners. • Ascribed a peripheral position within work groups move along a continuum stranger – friend ( Williams & Balaz, 2008) • Exchange rate between sending/receiving countries affects migrants and returned migrants.
Learning & development culture • Learning & Development continuous and life long professional activities • Supervision is valued, supported and well resourced • Even the most senior staff participate in supervision & professional development • Mistakes and problems are viewed as critical opportunities for learning • Good practice action, reflection, new thinking, planning & action • Individuals & teams review their effectiveness • Ongoing feedback betweendifferent levels of the organization
‘They move country and we expect then to start work the next day’ • ‘my experience is that they have, made the decision to come here, they have gone through the interview process and they’ve come. I don’t get a sense they think about that too much … it’s the excitement and the adrenaline of moving and I think it only hits you when you are here.’ • ‘That’s mine and there is your locker over there … this is not something we have though enough about from an organisational point of view.’
References Attride – Stirling, J. (2001) Thematic networks: analytic tool for qualitative research, Qualitative Research, vol.1 (3): pp 385-408. Casado, B., Hong, & D, Harrington. (2010) Measuring migratory grief and loss associated with the experience of immigration. Research on Social Work practice online firstpublished April 1, 2010 doi: 10.1177/1049731509360840. Crisp, B. (2009) Is there a role for ‘Foreigners’ as Social Work Educators? Social Work Education, Vol.28, No.6, pp.668-677. Dominelli, l ( 2010) Social Work in a Globalising World, Polity, Cambridge. Hardill, I., & S. McDonald. (2000) Skilled international migration: the experiences of Nurses in the U.K. Regional Studies, 34. (7) pp.681-692. Gray, M. (2005) Dilemmas of international social work: paradoxical processes in indigenisation, universalism and imperialism. International journal of social welfare, 14: 231-238. Healy, K. (2005). Social Work Theories in context - creating frameworks for practice. Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan. Hugman, R. Moosa- Mitha, M.& Moyo, O ( 2010) Towards a borderless social work Reconsidering notions of international social work, International Social Work, 53 (5), 629-643. Lee, G., & Westwood, M. (1996) Cross cultural issues faced by immigrant professionals. Journal of Employment Counselling, 33, (March), pp. 29 42.
References Simpson, G ( 2009) Global and Local issues in the training of overseas social workers Social Work Education, Vol 28, No 6, September 2009, 655-667 Walsh, T., Wilson, G., & E. O’Connor. (2009) Local, European and Global: An exploration of migrations of social workers into Ireland, British Journal of Social Work Advance access published 13 December,2009 doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp141. Weiss-Gal, I. & Welbourne, P. (2008) The professionalization of social work: cross national approach. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17: 281-290. Welbourne, P. Harrison, G., & D. Forde. (2007) Social work in the U.K and the global labour market: recruitment, practice and ethical considerations. International Social Work, 50(1), pp 27-40. Williams, A, & Balaz, V. (2008) International return mobility, learning and knowledge transfer: casestudyof Slovac doctors, Social Science & Medicine, 67, p. 1924-1933.