340 likes | 657 Views
Analyzing a Firm’s Capabilities and Resources. Chapter 5. Organizational Analysis . Strategic management is about creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Competitive advantage can be understood in the relationship of three constructs:
E N D
Organizational Analysis • Strategic management is about creating and sustaining competitive advantage. • Competitive advantage can be understood in the relationship of three constructs: • Use value-subjective valuation of a product; “worth” • Exchange value-objective price at the time of exchange • Consumer surplus-net value a customer derives from a purchase • Think of “buyer’s remorse” as negative consumer surplus
Competitive Advantage Use Value This area represents the value created in each profitable sale and consists of both profit for the firm and surplus for the customer. Consumer Surplus Exchange Value Profit Total Cost To the Firm This area representsthe firm’s total costs in presenting the product or service for sale. To create new value, the firm must cover its total costs.
Organizational Analysis • When a customer chooses to purchase from Firm A rather than Firm B, the following are true: • There was some difference in the consumer surplus offered by Firm A and Firm B • That difference gives Firm A a competitive advantage over Firm B • That competitive advantage can be attributed to Firm A’s capabilities and resources • This is a simplified statement of the resource based view used in conducting the organizational side of strategic analysis.
Organizational Analysis • The Resource-Based View (RBV) • Firms are constantly seeking to gain advantage and to translate that advantage into earnings. • Firms must appear more attractive than other options in the eyes of customers at the moment that customers decide to purchase. • To do this, firms make deliberate decisions about the procurement, development, and deployment of assets and resources used to produce advantage.
Organizational Analysis • The RBV holds that competitive advantage emerges from resources and capabilities that meet four criteria: • Value • Rarity • Inimitability • Non-substitutability
Organizational Analysis • Two types of resources • Tangible resources—physical resources that can be readily seen, touched, and/or quantified • Plant, property, and equipment, cash, etc. • Intangible resources—non-physical resources that can be difficult to quantify or be seen • Patents, trademarks, “secret family recipes”, etc. • Capabilities—what organizations can do based on what resources they possess • New product development, customer service, etc. • Dynamic capabilities—a unique ability to create new capabilities; ability to “update” capabilities
Organizational Analysis • Value • Valuable resources are resources that consumers desire or resources that give a firm an ability to produce products and services that consumers want. • A good location for a retail outlet • A good credit rating • A key technology • Valuable resources can be both tangible and intangible.
Organizational Analysis • Rarity • Consider three coffee shops in a two-block area of the same downtown. Each offers a slightly different location, a slightly different atmosphere; each has different personnel, different history, different reputation, and a historically different clientele. • For different segments of the market, each offers a uniquely different combination of products and services, a rare bundle of resources. • What specifically are these rare resources? • The answer lies in the eyes of any customer who would value any one of these stores over the others.
Organizational Analysis • Inimitability • Advantage from valuable and rare resources will diminish if imitated by competitors. • Diffusion of key capabilities can undermine competitive advantage. • Outsourcing can yield benefits. However, while the savings from outsourcing are appealing, it is important to consider the long term implications for imitability and rarity.
Organizational Analysis • Inimitability • Is Sam’s Cola an effective imitation of Coca-Cola? • It depends upon who you ask; for consumers who see little difference in the use value of different sodas, Sam’s Cola is an effective imitation. • Understanding what is or is not an effective imitation means understanding the nature of the value that the product or service provides.
Organizational Analysis • Non-Substitutability • Imitating a valuable and rare resource can be difficult. Thus, it can makes sense to substitute it with some equivalent resource. • The ability to substitute the value generating function of a resource reduces its value and its ability to sustain competitive advantage.
Resources, Capabilities, and Competitive Advantage Sustainable competitive advantage emerges from resources that are:
Learning from Harley-Davidson • What was the cause of Harley-Davidson’s decline and how did the company recover? • How would you quantify the power of the Harley- Davidson brand? • What do you think are Harley-Davidson’s distinctive competencies?
Organizational Analysis • The Value Chain • A tool for decomposing the value generating activities of an organization. • Term reflects that at each step, the product or service becomes more valuable • The value chain is based on a simple but powerful idea, that the value customers see and the value that leads to profits result from a series of distinct but interconnected activities.
Firm Infrastructure Human Resource Management Information Technology Margin Physical Plant & Maintenance Inbound Logistics Outbound Logistics Marketing & Sales Operations Margin The Value Chain
The Value Chain • Primary Activities: actions that are directly involved in creating and distributing goods and services (creating value!) • Inbound Logistics—the arrival of raw materials • Operations—the actual production process • Outbound Logistics—the movement of finished products to customers • Marketing & Sales—work to attract customers and convince them to make purchases • Service—the extent to which a firm provides assistance to their customers
The Value Chain • Support Activities: structures that provide underlying support primary activities • Firm Infrastructure—how the firm is organized (structure) • Human Resource Management—involves the recruitment, training, and compensation of employees • Technology—use of computerization and telecommunications to support activities • Procurement—process of negotiating for and purchasing raw materials
The Marketing Mix • The marketing mix (a.k.a.—4 P’s) provides important insights into how to leverage resources and capabilities into goods and services people will buy • Product—the good(s)/service(s) a firm sells • Price—the price at which goods/services are offered • Place—the location of offerings or distribution channels • Promotion—the communication s used to market a product (e.g., advertising, public relations, other forms of direct or indirect sales) • The marketing mix is critical to a firm’s survival and competitive advantage
Competitive Profile Analysis • Competitive Profile Analysis • Combines value chain analysis ,with the VRIN criteria and the outputs from the environmental analysis. • Based upon the environmental analysis and the mission and goals of the firm, an ideal value chain is developed. • That ideal profile provides the benchmark against which the current value chain is evaluated. • The gap between the ideal and the current guides the development of new strategy.
Competitive Profile Analysis CPA for textbook industry
Constraints Analysis • A constraints analysis helps identify root causes of problems that restrict an ideal outcome • Simple process • Identify problems that you believe restrict the outcome • Draw causal arrows from one problem to another if you believe that they are causal • The problems that have no arrows pointing at them are root causes and should be dealt with first
Constraints Analysis Cause D Cause B Cause A Problem Cause C Cause E Cause G Cause F
Final Thoughts & Caveats • The Fallacy of the Better Mousetrap • Better mousetrap fallacy – • “if a man can write a better book, preach a better sermon, or make a better mousetrap than his neighbor, though he builds his house in the woods, the world will make a beaten path to his door.” • While an appealing idea, research in the field of entrepreneurship underscores the reality that a better mousetrap, a better invention, a better technology, a better product, or a better service will not necessarily make a better or more profitable business.
Final Thoughts & Caveats • The Fallacy of the Better Mousetrap • Successes reflect timely interactions between the products and services that customers find attractive and a host of contextual circumstances that make those products and services valuable and difficult for other firms to imitate. • Even a truly better mousetrap might be ignored if it is never noticed by the market or if it is improperly marketed to consumers who do not have mouse problems!
Final Thoughts & Caveats • The Challenge of a Sustainable Advantage • Things change and resources that are valuable and rare today may be less so tomorrow, while resources that have no value today could be very valuable in the future. • Sustained competitive advantage is built upon resources that are valuable, rare, inimitable and non-substitutable. However, over time, few resources retain their value and few will remain highly rare if they are highly valued.
Final Thoughts & Caveats • The Challenge of Sustainable Advantage • So, is any competitive advantage truly sustainable? • The answer is that it is all a matter of perspective. • Sustaining an advantage, even for a short time, is still an important achievement as it allows a firm to reap greater profits and to realize greater returns. • At the same time, no competitive advantage is sustainable indefinitely. • Temporary advantage research suggests firms are better off concatenating short-term advantages into a sustainable path
Final Thoughts & Caveats • Ambiguity and Social Complexity • The relationship between competitive advantage and the resources that enable it is complex and difficult to discern, embedded in human interactions, historical endowments, and networks of tacit knowledge. • The process of gathering resources and creating from them competitive advantage is an imperfect one and cannot be reduced to a simple and generalizable formula.
Final Thoughts & Caveats • Ambiguity and Social Complexity • Social complexity simply means beyond the ability of most to understand or influence. • Competitive advantage is socially complex: • It is typically embedded in bundles of resources that connect to one another and to the people and operations of a firm in complex ways. As a result, competitive advantage is rarely attributable to any single, solitary resource or ability.
Final Thoughts & Caveats • Ambiguity and Social Complexity • Causal ambiguity exists when the connections between a firm’s resources and its competitive advantage are not well understood. • So, it is difficult to know which resources produce which outcomes. As a result, the process of resource acquisition and development becomes much more imprecise, uncertain, and expensive.
Three Final Caveats • Ambiguity and Social Complexity • Thus… • Competitive advantage is not a commodity that can be bought and sold. • Rather, it must be crafted, cultivated, and maintained. • “Firms cannot purchase sustained competitive advantage on open markets” – Barney (1986)