1 / 19

SIMULATION AND MONTE CARLO Some General Principles

SIMULATION AND MONTE CARLO Some General Principles. James C. Spall Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory September 2007. Overview. Basic principles Advantages/disadvantages Classification of simulation models Role of sponsor in simulation study

halil
Download Presentation

SIMULATION AND MONTE CARLO Some General Principles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SIMULATION AND MONTE CARLOSome General Principles James C. Spall Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory September 2007

  2. Overview • Basic principles • Advantages/disadvantages • Classification of simulation models • Role of sponsor in simulation study • Verification, validation, and accreditation • Parallel and distributed computing • Example of Monte Carlo in computing integral • What course will/will not cover • Homework exercises • Selected references

  3. Basics • System: The physical process of interest • Model: Mathematical representation of the system • Models are a fundamental tool of science, engineering, business, etc. • Abstraction of reality • Models always have limits of credibility • Simulation:A type of model where the computer is used to imitate the behavior of the system • Monte Carlo simulation: Simulation that makes use of internally generated (pseudo) random numbers

  4. Ways to Study System System Experiment w/ actual system Experiment w/ model of system Physical Model Mathematical Model Analytical Model Simulation Model Focus of class

  5. Some Advantages of Simulation • Often the only type of model possible for complex systems • Analytical models frequently infeasible • Process of building simulation can clarify understanding of real system • Sometimes more useful than actual application of final simulation • Allows for sensitivity analysis and optimization of real system without need to operate real system • Can maintain better control over experimental conditionsthan real system • Time compression/expansion: Can evaluate system on slower or faster time scale than real system

  6. Some Disadvantages of Simulation • May be very expensive and time consuming to build simulation • Easy to misuse simulation by “stretching” it beyond the limits of credibility • Problem especially apparent when using commercial simulation packages due to ease of use and lack of familiarity with underlying assumptions and restrictions • Slick graphics, animation, tables, etc. may tempt user to assign unwarranted credibility to output • Monte Carlo simulation usually requires several (perhaps many) runs at given input values • Contrast: analytical solution provides exact values

  7. Classification of Simulation Models • Static vs. dynamic • Static: E.g., Simulation solution to integral • Dynamic: Systems that evolve over time; simulation of traffic system over morning or evening rush period • Deterministic vs. stochastic • Deterministic:No randomness; solution of complex differential equation in aerodynamics • Stochastic (Monte Carlo): Operations of store with randomly modeled arrivals (customers) and purchases • Continuous vs. discrete • Continuous: Differential equations; “smooth” motion of object • Discrete:Events occur at discrete times; queuing networks (discrete-event dynamic systems is core subject of books such as Cassandras and Lafortune, 1999, Law, 2007, and Rubinstein and Melamed, 1998)

  8. Practical Side: Role of Sponsor and Management in Designing/Executing Simulation Study • Project sponsor (and management) play critical role • Simulation model and/or results of simulation study much more likely to be accepted if sponsor closely involved • Sponsor may reformulate objectives as study proceeds • A great model for the wrong problem is not useful • Sponsor’s knowledge may contribute to validity of model • Important to have sponsor “sign off” on key assumptions • Sponsor: “It’s a good model—I helped develop it.”

  9. Verification, Validation, and Accreditation • Verification and validation are critical parts of practical implementation • Verification pertains to whether software correctly implements specified model • Validation pertains to whether the simulation model (perfectly coded) is acceptable representation • Accreditation is an official determination (U.S. DoD) that a simulation is acceptable for particular purpose(s)

  10. Relationship of Validation and Verification Error to Overall Estimation Error • Suppose analyst is using simulation to estimate (unknown) mean vector of some process, say  • Simulation output is (say) X; X may be a vector • Let sample mean of several simulation runs be • Value is an estimate of  • Let be an appropriate norm (“size”) of a vector • Error in estimate of  given by:

  11. Parallel and Distributed Simulation • Simulation may be of little practical value if each run requires days or weeks • Practical simulations may easily require processing of 109 to 1012events, each event requiring many computations • Parallel and distributed (PAD) computation based on: Execution of large simulation on multiple processors connected through a network • PAD simulation is large activity for researchers and practitioners in parallel computation (e.g., Chap. 12 by Fujimoto in Banks, 1998; Law, 2007, pp. 61–66) • Distributed interactive simulation is closely related area; very popular in defense applications

  12. Parallel and Distributed Simulation (cont’d) • Parallel computation sometimes allows for much faster execution • Two general roles for parallelization: • Split supporting roles (random number generation, event coordination, statistical analysis, etc.) • Decompose model into submodels (e.g., overall network into individual queues) • Need to be able to decouple computing tasks • Synchronization important—cause must precede effect! • Decoupling of airports in interconnected air traffic network difficult; may be inappropriate for parallel processing • Certain transaction processing systems (e.g., supermarket checkout, toll booths) easier for parallel processing

  13. Parallel and Distributed Simulation (cont’d) • Hardware platforms for implementation vary • Shared vs. distributed memory (all processors can directly access key variables vs. information is exchanged indirectly via “messages”) • Local area network (LAN) or wide area network (WAN) • Speed of light is limitation to rapid processing in WAN • Distributed interactive simulation (DIS) is one common implementation of PAD simulation • DIS very popular in defense applications • Geographically disbursed analysts can interact as in combat situations (LAN or WAN is standard platform) • Sufficiently important that training courses exist for DIS alone (e.g., www.simulation.com/training)

  14. Example Use of Simulation: Monte Carlo Integration • Common problem is estimation of where f is a function, x is vector and  is domain of integration • Monte Carlo integration popular for complex f and/or  • Special case: Estimate for scalar x, and limits of integration a, b • One approach: • Let p(u) denote uniform density function over [a, b] • Let Uidenote ith uniform random variable generated by Monte Carlo according to the density p(u) • Then, for “large” n:

  15. Integral estimates for varying n n = 20 n = 200 n = 2000 b =  (ans.=2) 2.296 2.069 2.000 b = 2 (ans.=0) 0.847 0.091 0.0054 Numerical Example of Monte Carlo Integration • Suppose interested in • Simple problem with known solution • Considerable variability in quality of solution for varying b • Accuracy of numerical integration sensitive to integrand and domain of integration

  16. What Class Will andWill Not Cover • Emphasis is on general principles relevant to simulation • At class end, students will have rich “toolbox,” but will need to bridge gap to specific application • Classwillcover • Fundamental mathematical techniques relevant to simulation • Principles of stochastic (Monte Carlo) simulation • Algorithms for model selection, random number generation, simulation-based optimization, sensitivity analysis, estimation, experimental design, etc. • Classwill notcover • Particular applications in detail • Computer languages/packages relevant to simulation (GPSS, SIMAN, SLAM, SIMSCRIPT, etc.) • Software design; user interfaces; spreadsheet techniques; details of PAD computing; object-oriented simulation • Architecture/interface issues (HLA, virtual reality, etc.)

  17. Homework Exercise 1 Suppose a simulation output vector X has 3 components. Suppose that (a) Using the information above and the standard Euclidean (distance) norm, what is a (strictly positive) lower bound to the validation/verification error ? (b) In addition, suppose  = [1 0 1]T and = [2.3 1.8 1.5]T (superscript T denotes transpose). What is ? How does this compare with the lower bound in part (a)? Comment on whether the simulation appears to be a “good” model. Suppose analyst is using simulation to estimate (unknown) mean vector of some process, say  Simulation output is (say) X; X may be a vector Let sample mean of several simulation runs be Value is an estimate of  Let be an appropriate norm (“size”) of a vector Error in estimate of  given by:

  18. Homework Exercise 2 This problem uses the Monte Carlo integration technique (see earlier slide) to estimate for varying a, b, and n. Specifically: (a) To at least 3 post-decimal digits of accuracy, what is the true integral value when a = 0, b = 1? a = 0, b = 4? (b) Using n = 20, 200, and 2000, estimate (via Monte Carlo) the integral for the two combinations of a and b in part (a). (c) Comment on the relative accuracy of the two settings. Explain any significant differences.

  19. Selected General References in Simulation and Monte Carlo • Arsham, H. (1998), “Techniques for Monte Carlo Optimizing,” Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, vol. 4, pp. 181229. • Banks, J. (ed.) (1998), Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, Wiley, New York. • Cassandras, C. G. and Lafortune, S. (1999), Introduction to Discrete Event Systems, Kluwer, Boston. • Fu, M. C. (2002), “Optimization for Simulation: Theory vs. Practice” (with discussion by S. Andradóttir, P. Glynn, and J. P. Kelly), INFORMS Journal on Computing, vol. 14, pp. 192227. • Fu, M. C. and Hu, J.-Q. (1997), Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications, Kluwer, Boston. • Gosavi, A. (2003), Simulation-Based Optimization: Parametric Optimization Techniques and Reinforcement Learning, Kluwer, Boston. • Law, A. M. (2007), Simulation Modeling and Analysis (4th ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York. • Liu, J. S. (2001), Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing, Springer-Verlag, New York. • Robert, C. P. and Casella, G. (2004), Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York. • Rubinstein, R. Y. and Melamed, B. (1998), Modern Simulation and Modeling, Wiley, New York. • Spall, J. C. (2003), Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

More Related