1 / 13

Digital Repository Service ___________________________

Digital Repository Service ___________________________. Yale University Library Audrey Novak, Head IS&P. 7 March 2007. DRS Precursors ________________________________________________. Rescue Repository White Paper on Repositories, “Review of Digital Repositories” (2005) OAI - PMH

halla-sykes
Download Presentation

Digital Repository Service ___________________________

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Digital Repository Service___________________________ Yale University Library Audrey Novak, Head IS&P 7 March 2007

  2. DRS Precursors ________________________________________________ • Rescue Repository • White Paper on Repositories, “Review of Digital Repositories” (2005) • OAI - PMH • VITAL Review 7 March 2007

  3. Infrastructure________________________________________________Infrastructure________________________________________________ • Integrated Access Council (IAC) • Metadata • Digital Preservation • Digital Production and Integration Program (DPIP) • Assessment 7 March 2007

  4. Faculty Expectations________________________________________________ Faculty want online access to more digitized material, simpler means of finding material dispersed across collections, the ability to create new digital content quickly, assistance in organizing personal collections, and the ability to embed resources and services from a variety of sources in the environments where they conduct their daily intellectual lives. 7 March 2007

  5. Student Expectations _______________________________________________ Generation Y (16-25 yr olds) is hooked on technology and is better educated than any other generation. They see technology as an extension of how they relate to each other. They expect collaborative working environments in which they can work from anywhere, any time, and with anyone. Gen Y’ers are impatient multi-taskers used to instant everything. 7 March 2007

  6. The Challenge ________________________________________________ These faculty and student expectations translate into an information technology landscape that allows users to: • Control their own data/information. • Manage the life-cycle of their work from creation to preservation. • Remix, transform and integrate that data/information. • Harness collective intelligence. • Easily collaborate and contribute (publish) 7 March 2007

  7. VITAL Fez Elated Image Commons Classes *v2 (Sakai) CONTENT dm MetaLib DLF Aquifer (via OAI) Google and more MultipleContent Sources Multiple User Interfaces Digital Repository Service Building, maintaining & delivering digital collections for use in teaching & research. (Content, metadata, cross-collection searching, OAI harvesting, handle server.) Full and enduring access to digital resources over the long term. Full Text Books Finding Aids CollectionsEnvironment Audio & Video Preservation Archive Interface out Images E-Publishing (Institutional Repository) Integration Services Complex Objects Home for faculty research output. Scholarly publishing. Life-cycle management for course materials. Research Data Services that enable remixing, transforming, integration, easy collaboration, across systems. Personal Coll. Yale University Library January 2007

  8. DRS Architecture________________________________________________ • Fedora + VITAL (VTLS) • Offers an attractive combination of open-source development coupled with vendor support. • Fedora promises greater flexibility, versatility, ability to communicate with external systems and opportunities for future development. • Vendor support and enhancements offset our level-of-effort and jump-start the DRS. 7 March 2007

  9. Harvester VITAL clients External client / Fez DRS Architecture VITAL External Content External client / Elated Fedora Database | Tomcat Apache Browser (Firefox) Browser (IE) Browser (Other) SOAP Clients

  10. DRS Planning________________________________________________ • DRS: • Collections Environment • Preservation Archive • E-publishing • Integration Services • Initial focus on implementing the collections environment. • Active, ongoing work toward integration services and digital preservation. 7 March 2007

  11. Collections Environment Plan ________________________________________________ • Fedora/VITAL hub • 9 months • Start small • Work in increments • Transition quickly to production 7 March 2007

  12. Collections Environment Plan ________________________________________________ • Organization • Small Core Implementation team (7 staff) • Larger Working Group (20 staff) • Additional staff from collections, IT and administration. 7 March 2007

  13. Collections Environment Plan ________________________________________________ • Costs (9-months): • Salaries and benefits: $476,250 • Hardware, license: $155,200 7 March 2007

More Related