70 likes | 192 Views
Possible directions for NC sensitivity. Philip Rodrigues April 2008 Minos collaboration meeting, Sussex. Introduction. How might we improve sterile sensitivity? More generally, what affects our sensitivity? Investigate by fitting f sterile model with high-stats fake data
E N D
Possible directions for NC sensitivity Philip Rodrigues April 2008 Minos collaboration meeting, Sussex
Introduction • How might we improve sterile sensitivity? • More generally, what affects our sensitivity? • Investigate by fitting fsterile model with high-stats fake data • Ease of interpretation – can add other models later • Δm2=2.38, sin22θ=1, fs=0, high stats fake data scaled to 2.5e20 pot • TO selection, 1 NC and 1 CC spectrum unless stated • Caveat: Only statistical sensitivity.
Energy measures • Optimal shower energy resolution (0%!) • True neutrino energy!! Worse! Because Eshw!=nuEnergyNC • NC events smeared by y*shwRes – this says latter is small (relatively) • Not just a counting experiment
PID • “Magic” PID that selects NC with e=p=1 • Improves CC too, since no BG there • Improvements possible in principle. • In practice, probably not
y Distribution • Split NC sample at y=0.5,0.7 • Not so useful – this splits the CC background in the same way • Wouldn’t happen for a real y-dependent variable
Conclusions • No obvious easy way to improve sensitivity yet
Bonus slide • Energy correction function for Eshw: • Used in CC. Is it useful for NC? • CC: Enu=Emu+Eshw • Enu resolution degrades if (reco Eshw – true Eshw) is fn of Eshw • NC: Just Eshw, so true→reco matrix takes care of it