1 / 46

New Physics and Rare B Decays

New Physics and Rare B Decays. Tom Browder (University of Hawaii). New Physics in Loops (Motivation) b s Penguins (2 or 3 examples) Decays with “Large Missing Energy” How the Super B Factory fits in.

Download Presentation

New Physics and Rare B Decays

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Physics and Rare B Decays Tom Browder (University of Hawaii) • New Physics in Loops (Motivation) • bs Penguins (2 or 3 examples) • Decays with “Large Missing Energy” • How the Super B Factory fits in Apologies: Will aim at HEP physicists in other subfields. “If I could remember all the decay modes I would have been a botanist” Only a small subset of possible topics from Belle and BaBar are covered; a few of the results are ~ 1year old.

  2. New Physics Are there new particles beyond those in the SM, which have different couplings (either in magnitude or in phase) ? Supersymmety is an example (~40 new phases)

  3. How to find New Physics Phases Example: Vts: no KM phase f1 * Vtd , h’, K+K- , h’, K+K- + B B * Vtd f1 _ SM: sin2f1 =sin2f1 from BJ/y K0(bc c s) unless there are other, non-SM particles in the loop eff

  4. New physics in loops? Many new phases are possible in SUSY How New Physics may enter in bs

  5. Extra dimensions (by Randall + Sundrum) New Kaluza-Klein (K.K) particles are associated with the extra dimension. (“Tower of states”) Some may induce new phases and flavor-changing neutral currents. e.g. G. Burdman, Phys Lett B 590, 86 (2004) e.g. K.Agashe, G. Perez, A. Soni, PRD 71, 016002 (2005) RS1 ++CPV in D decay SM Model: K.K. Gluon near 3 TeV

  6. _ 535M BB Belle 2006: tCPV in B0gfK0 “sin2f1” = +0.50  0.21(stat)  0.06(syst) a.k.a sin(2β) Dt distributions and asymmetry • Consistent with the SM (~1s lower) • Consistent with Belle 2005 (Belle2005: “sin2f1” = +0.440.270.05) • fKS and fKL combined • background subtracted • good tags • Dt g –Dt for fKL unbinned fit SM hep-ex/0608039, PRL 98, 031802(2007)

  7. _ 347M BB BaBar: fK0using B0gK+K-K0 [hep-ex/0607112] b measurement (not sin2b) fK0: sin2beff = +0.12 ± 0.31(stat) ± 0.10 (syst) a.k.a. sin(2 φ1)

  8. 535M BB _ 347M BB 1st Observation of tCPV in a bs mode h’K0 h’Ks h’KL unbinned fit SM 5.6s >5s “sin2f1” = +0.64  0.10  0.04 “sin2f1” = +0.58  0.10  0.03 [hep-ex/0608039]PRL 98,031802(2007) [hep-ex/0607100], PRL+Sept 28 press conf

  9. Smaller than bgccs in all of 9 modes 2006: Hints of NP in bgs Penguins ? Theory predicts positive shifts Naïve average of all b g s modes sin2beff = 0.52 ± 0.05 2.6 s deviation from SM

  10. Results on Radiative and Electroweak Penguins Example discussed here: modifications to the rate for bs γ

  11. Measurement of inclusive b  sg Measure primary g only: monochromatic Eg spectrum Huge Background (semi-log) experimental challenge • Background suppression • continuum: event shape • p0/h veto Important to measure low Eg to reduce model dependence

  12. Nakao

  13. Theory News M. Misiak et al, hep-ph/0609232, PRL 98,022002(2007) NNLO calculation (29826) x 10-6

  14. 95% CL lower limit on charged Higgs mass from exp and NNLO Error on BF Central value of BF M. Misiak et al, hep-ph/0609232, PRL 98,022002 (2007)

  15. mb ms ms mb Right-handed currents in bgsg D.Atwood, M.Gronau, A.Soni, PRL79, 185 (1997) D.Atwood, T.Gershon, M.H, A.Soni, PRD71, 076003 (2005) • tCPV in B0g (Ksp0)K*g • SM: g is polarized, the final state almost flavor-specific. S(Ksp0g) ~ -2ms/mbsin2f1 • mheavy/mb enhancement for right-handed currents in many new physics models e.g. LRSM, SUSY, Randall-Sundrum (warped extra dimension) model • LRSM: SU(2)LSU(2)RU(1) • Right-handed amplitude mt/mb :  is WL-WR mixing parameter • for present exp. bounds ( < 0.003, WR mass > 1.4TeV) |S(Ksp0g)| ~ 0.5 is allowed. • No need for a new CPV phase Photon polarization measurement via time dependent CPV !

  16. 535M BB _ 232M BB Status of B KS 0γ tCPV M(Ks p 0) < 1.8 GeV Yield = 176+/- 18 (-C) hep-ex/0608017, PRD-RC 74, 111014(2006) No new physics but errors on S are large

  17. Rare Decays with Large “Missing Energy”

  18. Motivation for B++ν Sensitivity to new physics from charged Higgs if the B decay constant is known The B meson decay constant, determined by the B wavefunction at the origin

  19. e+ (4S) B- B+ ne n n B-X B++, +e+e Why measuring Bνis non-trivial Most of the sensitivity is from tau modes with 1-prong The experimental signature is rather difficult: B decays to a single charged track + nothing

  20. Example of a B ν candidate Tag: BD0, D0K Very difficult or impossible at a hadron collider

  21. Evidence for B+ν (Belle) BtagD(*)[p,r,a1,Ds(*)] 680k tags, 55% pure. 5 t decay modes 449 106 B pairs Find signal events from a fit to a sample of 54 events. 4.6s stat. significance w/o systematics, After including systematics (dominated by bkg), the significance decreases to 3.5σ MC studies show there is a small peaking bkg in the 0  and   modes. Extra Calorimeter Energy

  22. B+ν (BaBar preliminary) Awaiting BaBar’s analysis with hadronic tags

  23. Direct experimental determination of fB • Product of B meson decay constant fB and CKM matrix element |Vub| • Using |Vub| = (4.39  0.33)×10-3 from HFAG ( Belle) (PRL 97, 251802 (2006)) fB = 216  22 MeV (an unquenched lattice calc.) [HPQCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 212001 (2005) ] Theory:

  24. Constraints on charged Higgs mass Use known fB and |Vub |Ratio to the SM BF. excluded rH=1.130.51 excluded 449M Compare to direct searches for H+

  25. DAMA NaI 3s Region CDMS 04 CDMS 05 B  K(*)nn : Motivation _ b s with 2 neutrinos SM: B(BK* ) ~1.3 x 10-5 B (BK ) ~4 x 10-6 (Buchalla, Hiller, Isidori) _ _ PRD 63, 014015 • New Physics in Loop • Light Dark Matter (M~1GeV) No sensitivity to M<10 GeV in direct searches

  26. 535M BB B0 K*0nn : Belle (preliminary) _ [hep-ex/0608047] Exp. technique similar to B t+n Full-rec. tag & K + nothing 460K tags (1.7σ stat. significance) Sideband = 19 MC expectation = 18.73.3 SM Super B Factory LOI: 5σ observation of BK  will be possible with 50 ab-1

  27. Comments on Super B Factories

  28. Recent Developments for the Super B Factory Accelerator SuperKEKB design luminosity is now 8 x 1035/cm2/sec Low emittance/ILC inspired INFN/SLAC design is ~10 x 1035/cm2/sec c.f. Current KEKB luminosity is 1.7 x 1034/cm2 /sec To address the full array of new physics searches, require ~50 ab-1 of integrated luminosity c.f. Current KEKB integrated lumi 0.6 ab-1

  29. Ante-chamber & solenoid coils to reduce photo-electron clouds Super B Factory at KEK Interaction Region Crab crossing q=30mrad. by*=3mm New QCS New Beam pipe More RF power Damping ring Linac upgrade L = 81035/cm2 /sec

  30. Conceptual Design Report will be submitted to INFN soon. Question: 12 nanometer beam spot in y, 2.7 microns in x. Is this possible in a real 2-3 km circumference multi-orbit machine ?

  31. First step towards Super B: Crab crossing . Superconducting crab cavities (1 LER and 1 HER) have been installed and now are being tested at KEKB.

  32. Backup Slides

  33. The Super B Factory is part of a Unified and Unbiased Attack on New Physics n expts accel, reactor, gm-2, mgeg, etc. LHC, ILC Higgs boson mass and couplings. New particle searches n mass and mixing, CPV, and LFV Lepton sector Propagators New physics Quark sector • LFV, t CPV Flavor mixing, CPV phases Super B Factory, LHCb, Rare K expts, BESIII…

  34. Fundamental Questions in Flavor Physics Why three generations ? String Theory ? (e.g. P.Binetruy et.al., hep-th/0509157; J.Phys G.32: 129 (2006)); Larger Symmetry Groups ? Experiments with quarks or heavy leptons? This question is probably too hard – more tractable questions….. Are there New Physics Phases and New sources of CP Violation Beyond the SM ? Experiments: bs CPV, compare CPV angles from tree and loops Are there new operators with quarks enhanced by New Physics ? Experiments: AFB(BK*l l), BK  rates and asymmetries Are there right-handed currents ? Experiments: bs  CPV, B->VPγ or BV V triple-product asymmetries Are there new flavor changing neutral currents ? Experiments: bs ννbar, D-Dbar CPV+mixing+rare, τγ These questions can only be answered at a Super B Factory.

  35. Lessons of History New Physics is usually discovered first in loop processes, which involve high massvirtual particles. (Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle) Example I: Absence of KL allowed theorists to deduce the existence of the charm quark. The rate of K mixing allowed a rough determination of the charm mass. Example II: The absence of bs decays and the long B lifetime ruled out topless models. Large Bd mixing showed the top was heavy contrary to theory prejudices of the time. Radiative corrections from Z measurements determined the rough range of the top mass. Vtd Vtd Beautiful and precise measurements of the top quark mass at the Tevatron. However, the couplings |Vts|,|Vtd,|and most importantly the phase of (Vtd) cannot be measured in direct top production.

  36. http://www.jahep.org/hec/doc/jahep_tenbou_eng_final.pdf (An excerpt) ....

  37. K. Oide (Leading Japanese Accelerator Physicist) “Dai-repoton keikaku” Budget of Japanese acceleratorphysicists Official Announcement from KEK director A. Suzuki on Super B expected in 2007

  38. The Hunt for the EW Penguin:BXs l+ l- Discovered by CLEO in 1994 As in bs γ, heavy particles in the loops can be replaced with NP particles (e.g.W+  H+) Note contributions from virtual γ* , W, Z* and internal t quark.

  39. hep-ex/0508004, 88.9 MBB Eγ>1.9 GeV B → Xsγ from a sum of 38 exclusive decay modes

  40. b  sg : Belle result Efficiency corrected spectrum 140fb-1 Eg >1.8 GeV (cover 95.2%) B(B s g) = (3.55 0.32 ) x10-4 +0.30 +0.11 -0.31 -0.07 (Stat) (sys) (theo) Moments: <Eg> = 2.292 0.0260.034 GeV <Eg2> - <Eg>2 = 0.0311 0.0730.063 GeV2 useful for Vcb,Vub [hep-ex/0403004, PRL xxx] An update with much more data (x 3) is in progress

  41. SuperKEKB Projection for B g Ksp0g and other b g sg modes Possible deviation O(1): Warped extra dim. O(1): L-R symmetric model O(0.1): SUSY SU(5)

  42. B gfK0, h’K0, KsKsKs projection for SuperKEKB total errors (incl. systematic errors)

  43. Obtain CP parameters for 2-body and 3-body modes simultaneously by time-dependent Dalitz fit _ 347M BB New ! “Golden” mode:fK0 B0gK+K-K0 Dalitz tCPV K+K-KSgp+p- K+K-KSgp0p0 K+K-KL 151665 K+K-K0signal [hep-ex/0607112] MK+K-

  44. b  sg : Bkg subtraction backup B background B p0/h X: measured by data include in MC Continuum use OFF-resonance data (ECM 60 MeV lower)

  45. B  K(*)nn : Motivation _ b s with 2 neutrinos SM: B(BK* ) ~1.3 x 10-5 B (BK ) ~4 x 10-6 (Buchalla, Hiller, Isidori) _ _ PRD 63, 014015 • New Physics in Loop • Light Dark Matter (M~1GeV) No sensitivity in direct searches

  46. LHCb J. Libby 10 fb-1 for LHCb 50 fb-1 for SuperB The Super B Factory will face tough competition from LHCb, which is now a real experiment. There is considerable complementarity: photon, neutral detection and inclusive channels are considerable easier at the Super B Factory while time-dependent Bs studies are superior at LHCb.

More Related