1 / 4

Outcomes

Outcomes. 1. Reviewed/refined the prioritized problem statements 2. Generated a “wish list” of outcomes for each of the prioritized problem statements 3. Asked a series of guiding questions Are these really outcomes? Do they address the problem directly? Do they address the problem fully?

hamlet
Download Presentation

Outcomes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outcomes 1. Reviewed/refined the prioritized problem statements 2. Generated a “wish list” of outcomes for each of the prioritized problem statements 3. Asked a series of guiding questions • Are these really outcomes? • Do they address the problem directly? • Do they address the problem fully? • What type of difference will the outcomes make in the problem?

  2. Outcomes 4. Reviewed/narrowed the outcomes • Which outcomes seemed most realistic/possible/measurable? • Which outcomes were clearly not measurable (e.g. social norm change) • What types of “proxy” measures could we utilize to measure some of the “not measurable” outcomes • What does the research say? What are the realistic measures?

  3. Outcomes 5. Reviewed the outcome measures with the committees/staff • Which seemed to be more “goal” level measures and “objective” level measures • Which appeared to be Standards and Practices? • Began dividing out the measures 6. Prioritized the outcome measures

  4. Standards and Practices

More Related