120 likes | 367 Views
Supervision in Organizations Chapter 11 Supervising Groups & Work Teams. Learning Outcomes After reading this chapter, I will be able to:. Contrast a group and a team. Define norm. Explain the relationship between cohesiveness and group productivity.
E N D
Supervision in Organizations Chapter 11 Supervising Groups & Work Teams
Learning OutcomesAfter reading this chapter, I will be able to: • Contrast a group and a team. • Define norm. • Explain the relationship between cohesiveness and group productivity. • Describe who is likely to become an emergent leader in an informal group. • Explain what a supervisor can do when group norms are hindering department performance. • List the characteristics of teams. • List actions a supervisor can take to improve team performance. • Describe the role of teams in continuous-improvement programs.
What is a Group? • Group “Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular objectives” (p. 305) • Formal Group • Example: Committees, group meetings, work teams, task force • Informal Group • Groups which are natural formations that appear in the work environment in response to the need for social contact (often to share frustration or let off steam)
Understanding Informal Groups • To have a better understanding of informal groups, the following: • Norms • Acceptable standards (e.g., effort and performance, dress, and loyalty) shared and enforced by the members of a group • Output level • Absenteeism rates • socializing • Cohesiveness • The degree to which members are attracted to each other and are motivated to stay in a group • Emergent leadership • A leader who emerges within a work group without having formal authority in the organization
Examples of Cards Used in Asch Study Solomon Asch and Group Conformity:Does the desire to be accepted as a part of a group leave one susceptible to conforming to the group’s norms? Will the group exert pressure that is strong enough to change a member’s attitude and behavior? According to the research by Solomon Asch, the answer appears to be yes. Exhibit 8.9
How to Influence Informal Work Groups • Group Norms • Reward members who act against dysfunctional norms • Request Transfer of one or more members • Give preferred work assignments • Department Goals • Show how dysfunctional behavior undermine organizational, departmental, or group goals • Emergent Leaders • Identify and develop positive relationship with emergent leader • Utilize grapevine and validate concerns with emergent leader
Teams vs. Work Groups • Teams – work groups established by the organization & have designed work assignments and established tasks. • Groups – individuals working together to share info & to make decisions to help each other perform better
Turning Groups into Teams • Working group – group of individuals who interact to share information to help each other perform better • Pseudo team – product of negative synergy • Potential team – “Going in the right direction but not there yet” • Real team – unit with a set of common characteristics that lead to consistently high performance
Stage 1: Forming The team experiences uncertainty about its purpose, structure, and leadership. Stage 2: Storming Intragroup conflict predominates within the group Stage 3: Norming Close relationships develop and group members begin to demonstrate cohesiveness. Stage 4: Performing The team develops a structure that is fully functional and accepted by team members. Stage 5: Adjourning The team prepares for its disbandment. The Stages Of Team Development
How to Build Real Teams • Small Size – ten or fewer people • Complementary Skills • Technical skills • Problem solving/decision-making skills • Interpersonal skills • Common Purpose – vision with meaningful purpose • Specific goals – specific and realistic goals • Common Approach – plans with equal workload • Mutual Accountability – individual and group level • Social loafing: the tendency of an individual in a group to decrease his or her effort because responsibility and individual achievement cannot be measured