300 likes | 431 Views
An innovative modeling approach for simulating hypoxia/anoxia in estuarine ecosystems. Mark J. Brush James N. Kremer Scott W. Nixon with contributions from: John Brawley Nicole Goebel Jamie Vaudrey. ERSEM I (1995). Also: Reckhow (1994 & others) Håkanson (1995, 2004)
E N D
An innovative modeling approach for simulating hypoxia/anoxia in estuarine ecosystems Mark J. Brush James N. Kremer Scott W. Nixon with contributions from: John Brawley Nicole Goebel Jamie Vaudrey
ERSEM I (1995) Also: Reckhow (1994 & others) Håkanson (1995, 2004) Hofmann & Lascara (1998) Pace (2001) Duarte et al. (2003) Fulton et al. (2003) Rigler & Peters (1995) Kremer & Nixon (1978) Baretta & Ruardij (1988) Steele (1974) Riley (1946, 1947) Odum (1983) ERSEM II (1997) Odum (1994) Chesapeake Bay Model USE OF MODELS IN MANAGEMENT NUMBER OF PUBLICATIONS
# of parameters Loss of utility at lowest complexity? predictability Increasing complexity / realism Trade-off between realism & predictability: Generality Precision Realism R. Levins (1966, 1968)
Phytoplankton Primary Production Published Gmax Functions 1971-1998 Brush et al. (2002) elevated Eppley Gmax , d-1 Eppley Curve TEMPERATURE, oC
Duarte et al. (2003) “The Limits to Models in Ecology”
Question: Can a simplified eutrophication model be useful as a heuristic and management tool? Empirical “Stressor-Response” Models Complex, Mechanistic Systems Models Can we find a middle ground? Generality Precision R. Levins (1966, 1968) Realism • Parsimony Principle • Ockam's Razor
Phyto Production Pelagic Respiration C flux to sediments Denitrification Estuarine Eutrophication Model * Need to accurately model both states and rates Macro Metabolism
Phytoplankton Primary Production Light x Biomass (“BZI”) Models Pd = *Chl*Zp*PAR + … capped by available nutrients Brush et al. (2002) MEPS v. 238 Cole & Cloern (1987) MEPS v. 36
Water Column Respiration Rd = *e kT*Chl10
Carbon Flux to Sediments & Benthic Respiration Nixon (1981) Estuaries and Nutrients The Humana Press Csed = 0.25*Pd Rsed = *e kT
Denitrification Nixon et al. (1996) Biogeochemistry 35(1) DENIT = Nload*f(RT)
Empirical Functions • Robust, data-driven, & apply across several systems - ideal when • mechanistic formulations are insufficient or poorly constrained. • Reduce model complexity by integrating multiple processes • (which are often poorly constrained) into simplified, bulk functions. • Produce output we can measure and test. • Excellent tools for model validation. … a hybrid, empirical-mechanistic approach
Greenwich Bay Eutrophication Model Greenwich Bay, RI (Avg Z = 3 m)
Lower West Passage Chl-a Surface Phytoplankton
Bottom O2 with Forced Maximum Chlorophyll a original run max chl
MERL fcn of T, Chl, NPP model In the absence of flux measurements * Need to accurately model both states and rates Rate Processes Annual Primary Production g C m-2 y-1 Observed: 281 – 326 Modeled: 306
System-Level Validation: Nutrient Reduction Scenarios Keller (1988) Nixon et al. (2001) Nixon et al. (1996)
Empirical Models A Simplified, Hybrid Empirical-Mechanistic Systems Model Complex, Mechanistic Systems Models Generality Precision R. Levins (1966, 1968) Realism • Multiple, parallel modeling • approaches, e.g.: • Latour, Brush & Bonzek (2003) • Scavia et al. (2003) • Borsuk et al. (2002, 2004)
Oviatt et al. Models for Hypoxia Applied in Narragansett Bay NOAA Coastal Hypoxia Research Program
Nutrient Reduction Scenarios Bottom O2, mg/L 0% watershed N,P 0% Narr. Bay N,P 0% Narr. Bay N,P & saturating O2
PROVIDENCE RIVER LOWER NARRAGANSETT BAY
Scope for Improvement: Pre-Colonial Inputs Bottom O2 Nixon (1997) Estuaries 20(2)
Effect of Macroalgal Decomposition Bottom O2 Bottom O2
Stochastic Simulation Kremer (1983) Bottom O2
Dr. Brush’s wardrobe provided by: Bay St. Louis Kmart Acknowledgements James N. Kremer Scott W. Nixon John Brawley Nicole Goebel Jamie Vaudrey