1 / 15

Brief Overview of the CREW Project

Brief Overview of the CREW Project. Rijit Sengupta CUTS International CREW Project Inception Meeting 13-14 March 2013, Jaipur (India). Outline of Presentation. I. Background and Introduction - Genesis - Competition reforms - Why CUTS interest? - Making competition regimes effective

hanley
Download Presentation

Brief Overview of the CREW Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Brief Overview of the CREW Project RijitSengupta CUTS International CREW Project Inception Meeting 13-14 March 2013, Jaipur (India)

  2. Outline of Presentation I. Background and Introduction - Genesis - Competition reforms - Why CUTS interest? - Making competition regimes effective II. About the CREW project - Goal & Objectives - Outputs & Outcome - Implementation - Caveats

  3. A story from Kenya: Cane farmers laud increased competition in sugar sector

  4. I. Genesis – a felt need  Competition can promote consumerandproducer/business welfare – not much doubt  Competition not an end in itself, but a means for achieving developmental goals  Presence of competition law not adequate, a comprehensive approach necessary - competition reforms  DCs suffer from implementation challenges: - Government support often meager - Limited stakeholder understanding & support - Development partners’ priorities - Etc.  Implementation key to linking competition with developmental gains

  5. II. Competition reforms – conceptual clarity Competition reforms = A + B + C A: Enabling government policies that promote competition in markets B: Appropriate regulatory framework, institutions and actions for promoting competition in sectors C:Well defined competition legislation and effective enforcement mechanisms

  6. III. Why did CUTS get interested? • How to better demonstrate positive impacts of competition reforms on DC consumer & producers? • Is there a way to isolate such benefits of competition? • Is there an way to communicate with key decision makers?

  7. IV. Existing evidence & experience Studies/Evidence  Japan (2001) - positive effects of competition on industrial growth  S. Korea (2003) - competition reforms a remarkable turning point  Tanzania (2004) - competition increased firm-level productivity  Jordan (2005) – impact of concentration & barriers on productivity  Egypt (2005) – liberalisation of market leading to productivity gains  Australia (2005) - AU$ 20 billion gain in real GDP from NCP  Mexico (2008) – liberalisation (basic goods) benefit consumers • Others Enforcement experience Regulatory enforcement (including competition enforcement) benefits producers/suppliers and protects consumers – Many cases

  8. VI. CREW Project – Goal & Objectives Goal To better demonstrate measurable benefits from effective competition reforms in DCs, for ensuring long-term support for competition Objectives  Enhance understanding of benefits from effective competition reforms in specific DC markets  Develop & Test a methodology to assess efficacy of competition reforms in benefitting consumers and producers  Advocateto key actors (National & International) for greater support to competition reforms in DCs  Sustain momentumon competition reforms and take it forward in DCs

  9. VI. CREW project – Outputs & Outcome Outputs  Document evidence of benefits in key markets  Dialogue involving multiple stakeholders on benefits  Strategy for capacity building of competition agencies  Framework that guides competition reforms in DCs  Demand from other countries for similar exercise Outcome: Greater attention and impetus for competition reforms in key DC markets resulting in consumer and producer benefits

  10. VI. CREW Project - Implementation  4 Countries: 2 Asian & 2 African  2 Sectors: High impact on the poor Phase I: Identify ‘indicators’ and ‘enablers’ of an effective competition regime (Diagnostic report) Phase II: Develop Framework for Competition Promotion (FCP) for the 2 sectors Phase III:Apply sectoral FCPs in micro-locations in 4 project countries

  11. VI. Programme Logic (Phase-I) • Outline of DCRs • Degree and nature of competition (markets): CHECK-LIST OF COMPETITION CONCERNS • Identification of Consumer & Producer benefits/losses: PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION • Enabling and/or Opposing factors: STRATEGIC FINE-TUNING

  12. VII. Benefits of competition reforms for Consumers Price: Prices are reduced in a ‘contestable market’ Access: Goods and services reach consumers in areas where they were not available earlier Quality-Price ratio: High quality goods and services available for low prices for consumers (value for money) Choice: New products enter otherwise ‘concentrated’ markets Time Savings: Amount of time saved by the consumer in availing a service/good

  13. VII. Benefits of competition reforms for Producers  Ease of entry: - No entry barriers for firms to enter new markets  Productivity gains - Easy access to ‘inputs’ market - No impediments to access infrastructure - Considerable ease of doing business  Revenue gains or cost savings  Ability to access markets - Free movement of goods, services

  14. VIII. CREW Project – Caveats  It is not a project only about competition enforcement, it is much more comprehensive/broad in scope  It will not measure the full-range of impacts of competition on producers and consumers in the countries  Evolve and validate a methodology for doing so in micro-locations  Activities will be restricted to 4 countries and 2 sectors  Uptake of the exercise in other countries would depend on interest of beneficiaries

  15. Thank You www.cuts-ccier.org/CREW

More Related