1 / 10

Added Value of a CCS Cluster for Yorkshire and Humber

Added Value of a CCS Cluster for Yorkshire and Humber. Stephen Brown Director of Carbon Capture and Storage Conference of the Regions Workshop Rotterdam 1st July 2010. Why Yorkshire and Humber?. 60Mt of CO 2 emissions from single point sources

hannelore-evan
Download Presentation

Added Value of a CCS Cluster for Yorkshire and Humber

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Added Value of a CCS Cluster for Yorkshire and Humber Stephen Brown Director of Carbon Capture and Storage Conference of the Regions Workshop Rotterdam 1st July 2010

  2. Why Yorkshire and Humber? • 60Mt of CO2 emissions from single point sources • Range of sectors – not just coal-fired power generation • Located in a relatively small geographic area • Adjacent coastline to southern North Sea gas fields • Considerable industry interest • Opportunity to gain a world lead for the region

  3. Why Develop a Cluster ? • Exploit existing industrial infrastructure • Fuel/material supply • Grid connection • Pipeline wayleaves • Offshore assets • Enable rapid development and deployment • Mitigate price/volume risk in CO2 transport • Intuitively cost effective and efficient • Attract new investment • But – requires oversized pipelines in early years

  4. Cluster Opportunity • Ferrybridge to Theddlethorpe picking up all large emitters • CO2 up to 125 bar but below critical temperature • Tree structure more appropriate • Phased development from 2011 to 2030 • Opportunity to reuse some existing gas infrastructure • Target two clusters of gas fields for storage • CAPEX +£2bn; 55,000 construction jobs; £30bn GVA • 8.6Gt CO2 storage - beyond 2050 • Regional network more cost effective for each emitter than individual ‘source to store’ projects

  5. Initiating a Pipeline by 2015- schematic routings • Two integrated phases, £643m • Two separate phases, £896m • 11 years ‘no regrets’ of initial overcapacity

  6. Additional Opportunities • Shipping terminal for CO2 import/export • Storage risk mitigation for NER300 projects • EOR • Parallel hydrogen infrastructure • Test bed for technology development • UGC • CO2 mineralisation • Attract and OEM?

  7. Thank You • stephen.brown@co2sense.org.uk Tel: +44 113 237 8409 Mob: +44 7989 141195 • Tel: 0113 237 8409

More Related