110 likes | 124 Views
Image and status of librarians. Katja Airaksinen Terri McCargar Sally Perry Peter Wood Kristin Zimmerman. 1. How others see us? Some stereotypes…. 2. How we see ourselves.
E N D
Image and status of librarians Katja Airaksinen Terri McCargar Sally Perry Peter Wood Kristin Zimmerman
We see ourselves as professionals-___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Professionals who are • educated • qualified (sometimes chartered) • knowledgeable about IT • organised and efficient • good at communicating • “people” people • adaptable. We are also good multi-taskers, effective at managing: • collections, finance, information, knowledge, people.
The image problem…___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Librarians overly preoccupied with issues of image? (US, UK) • A real danger: as the gap widens between the reality of work as a librarian and the stereotype, the stereotype becomes more damaging for our profession.
Impact on pay___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Librarians’ qualifications and status often not recognised in pay packets: • Average UK salary for librarians approximately £24k– which is £3k below the average UK salary generally, and almost £10k below the average salary for ‘Professional occupations’ (Office for National Statistics) • Gap between male and female pay • Salary particularly low for a profession generally requiring a postgraduate degree • Often paid on a clerical rather than an academic/ teaching/ professional grade.
Impact on job security and resources___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Librarians are often seen as: • replaceable by Internet/Search engines • dispensable or squeezable when it comes to budget cuts • providing a peripheral rather than core service, and so can be marginalised within an organisation. Such perceptions affect libraries as well: e.g. The Comprehensive Performance Assessment Framework 2004: libraries seen as one of the least important areas of activity in judging council performance
Impact on role___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Can stifle opportunities for librarians to develop their role and the services they offer. They often are: • not included in many relevant activities within their organisation • not seen as having much to contribute to IT-related projects • not seen as appropriate for higher level management roles (particularly outside ‘traditional’ library environments) • not associated with emerging areas such as knowledge management. Higher pay and good opportunities often attached to these roles…
What can we do to change the image?___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Proactive self-promotion: • Make users/ organisation/ community aware of what we offer • Use CILIP – for support/ advice, networking, and, as professional body, to drive national campaign for better pay and recognition Be flexible about role; aware of emerging opportunities: e.g. in new sectors, knowledge management and IT BUT: don’t lose sight of the traditional strengths/ positives • “rebranding” core skills to appeal to new generation?