1 / 27

Intersegmental Efforts to Facilitate Student Transfer Jane Patton Michelle Pilati

Intersegmental Efforts to Facilitate Student Transfer Jane Patton Michelle Pilati. Description.

happy
Download Presentation

Intersegmental Efforts to Facilitate Student Transfer Jane Patton Michelle Pilati

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Intersegmental Efforts to Facilitate Student Transfer Jane PattonMichelle Pilati ASCCC Leadership Institute 2006

  2. Description • Improving transfer for our students has become an ever-more important and complex goal, especially given the dissolution of CAN and new transfer initiatives such as LDTP at CSU and the UC Streamlining Project. A replacement proposal to CAN, called C-ID is being developed, and the 3 segments seek ongoing funding for IMPAC---the only formal forum for inter-segmental faculty dialog. As a senate leader, you will be expected to understand and promote efforts that strengthen student transfer to four-year institutions. This is your chance to learn about these important initiatives.

  3. Alternative Titles • Transfer Initiatives • Acronym Hell • How does anyone ever get out of here? • What happens when the legislature tries to simplify our lives..

  4. Can you identify these? • CAN • C-ID • IMPAC • LDTP • ICAS • SB 70 • SciGETC • Streamlining UC • OSCAR; ASSIST

  5. CAN • California Articulation Number • CC – CSU (UC never really played) • What can CAN do for us now? • While essentially defunct, CAN numbers will be relied upon initially for LDTP (more on that later)

  6. CCC Numbering System “C-ID”Course Identification

  7. What is C-ID? A proposal that improves upon CAN • a supra-numbering system • a response to mandates and needs • course descriptors for use by postsecondary institutions and CCC students

  8. C-ID: a response to mandates • Legislation (SB 450, SB 851, SB 1415) • MOUs

  9. C-ID: a response to need • Students • Articulation officers, counselors, staff • Universities

  10. IMPACIntersegmentalMajor PreparationArticulated Curriculum

  11. IMPAC • To facilitate intersegmental and interdisciplinary discussion among segments of higher education • To clarify expectations for major preparation • To encourage faculty dialog of curriculum • To foster intersegmental cooperation

  12. Progress • 33 disciplines met • 12 interdisciplinary discussions held • 2,290 faculty participated • 167 CAN descriptors were written/revised • How many of you intended an IMPAC meeting?

  13. Accomplishments • SciGETC • One-semester chemistry course • Supplemental labs • Advising letters • Alignment of learning objectives • Development of LDTP course descriptors

  14. Future • Uncertain—not funded in 2006-07 • Funds could be available in 2007-08 • Working with ICAS to advertise the accomplishments of IMPAC

  15. LDTP Lower Division Transfer Pattern • CSU Project (SB 1785 & MOU) • Goal: to improve transfer into majors • Gives highest priority for admission • Plan: to take effect Fall 2007 • First 30 majors are to be completed by June 2006 • Approved courses will have a TCSU number • Status

  16. ICAS • Intersegmental Committee of Academic Senates • The dysfunctional family dines together • No, really – a valuable opportunity for intersegmental collaboration.

  17. Statewide Career Pathways: Creating School to College Articulation

  18. Statewide Career Pathways • SB 70--chaptered into Ed Code 88532 • CCC System Office ---developing many projects • Academic Senate will develop this one project: HS articulation

  19. Goals 1. Target relevant regional fields 2. Develop artic. & pathways 3. Create artic. standards 4. Identify online technology 5. Increase student participation 6. Develop database 7. Build sustainability

  20. Some components • H.S. and college faculty meetings • Database of agreements • Outreach to students & institutions • Mechanism to sustain, renew, disseminate agreements

  21. Status • Steering committee meets in July • Existing articulation agreements are collected • Progress on database • Working with System Office, DoE, schools, ROPCs, tech prep

  22. Senate’s role • Curriculum oversight over all articulation (with universities & high schools) • Benefit for our students • Reaching students in H.S. can bring them to colleges, then to universities

  23. SciGETC • Science IGETC (intersegmental general education transfer curriculum) • For high unit science majors • Goal: to permit postponement of 2 GE courses until after transfer

  24. Streamlining UC Articulation Project • SB 477 requires every UC to articulate specific CCC courses/sequences when 4 or more UCs already articulated them • Transfer pathways will be published

  25. One more relevant acronym • SACC =System Advisory Committee on Curriculum • CIOs, SO staff, and ASCCC at the table to discuss matters related to curriculum • Progress: Stand alones; Handbook

  26. ICAS “A Transfer Discussion Document” Available at http://www.academicsenate.cc.ca.us Click on: • ICAS • Current projects • A Transfer Discussion Document Helpful glossary and summary of all legislative actions re. transfer.

  27. to contact us. . . jane_patton@wvmccd.cc.ca.us mpilati@riohondo.edu

More Related