440 likes | 454 Views
This project management guide provides a comprehensive overview of developing a network plan, including milestone plans, work packages, activity-on-node network fundamentals, network diagrams, Gantt charts, and more. Learn how to create a detailed project plan, manage activities efficiently, and track progress effectively to ensure successful project completion.
E N D
Introduction to Project Management Developing a Network Plan Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
A B C Level 1 - Milestone Plan D E F Level 2 - Plans Level 3 - Plans WP-1 WP-4 WP-3 WP-2 Rollup of Network Plans Figure 4-1 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Lowestelement Circuitboard BP-10-1 AD-1-1D-1-2 DP-10-2 FS-22-2 KT-13-1 Designcostaccount OrganizatioUnits DesignWP D-1-1 SpecificationsWP D-1-2 Documentation CS-22-1 Productioncostaccount ProductionWP P-10-1 Proto 1WP P-10-2 Final Proto 2 BProto 15 Testcostaccount Test systemsWP T-13-1 Test ASpecificationsand documentation2 DFinalproto 24 FFinalsoftware2 KTest3 Softwarecostaccount SoftwareWP S-22-1 Software preliminaryWP S-22-1 Software final version CPreliminarysoftware3 WBS/Work Packages to Network Figure 4-2 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
J, K, & L can all begin atthe same time, if you wish(they need not occursimultaneously) Y Z X Y Z M L X K C J A B A is preceded by nothingB is preceded by AC is preceded by B but All (J, K, L) must becompleted before M canbegin (A) (C) Y and Z are preceded by X Z is preceded by X and Y Y and Z can begin at the same time, if you wish AA is preceded by X and Y AA (B) (D) Activity-on-Node Network Fundamentals Figure 4-3 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department EF Activity-on-Node Network Fundamentals Figure 4-6 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department Activity-on-Node Network Forward Pass Figure 4-7 20 15 35 200 20 15 10 EF Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
185 20 185 5 20 10 15 20 KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department LS Activity-on-Node Network Backward Pass Figure 4-8 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
185 20 15 20 185 20 5 15 10 20 10 15 20 KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department LS EF Activity-on-Node Network with Slack Figure 4-9 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
LegendR = ResponsibilityC = ContributesA = Advises OrganizationUnit/Individual Activities Software Conversion ProjectResponsibility Matrix Figure 4-10 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Softwaredevelopment 2 18 2 2022 40 Orderstandardparts 3 15 2 1715 30 7 8 Test Assemble Orderreview 1 540 4540 45 1030 4030 40 20 20 2 Producestandardparts 4 10 2 12 5 15 Legend Manufacturecustomhardware 6 8 # Activity 1515 3015 30 Designcustom parts 5 DurationES EFLS LF 13 2 12 5 15 Air Control Inc., Custom OrderProject—Network Diagram Figure 4-12 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
2 Order review Design custom parts 13 Order standard parts 15 Produce standard parts 10 18 Software development Manufacture customhardware 15 10 Assemble 5 Test 0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 Air Control Inc., Custom OrderProject—Gantt Chart Figure 4-13 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Softwaredevelopment 2 18 2-Jan 20-Jan22-Jan 9-Jan Order standard parts 3 15 2-Jan 17-Jan 15-Jan 30-Jan 7 8 Test Assemble Orderreview 1 5 9-Jan 14-Jan 9-Jan 14-Jan 10 30-Jan 9-Jan 30-Jan 9-Jan 2 1-Jan 2-Jan 1-Jan 2-Jan Produce standard parts 4 10 2-Jan 12-Jan 5-Jan 15-Jan Legend Manufacturecustom hardware 6 8 # Activity Designcustom parts 15 15-Jan 30-Jan 15-Jan 30-Jan 5 DurationES date EF dateLS date LF date 13 2-Jan 15-Jan 2-Jan 15-Jan Air Control Inc., Custom OrderProject—Network with Dates Figure 4-14 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Trench1/3 Trench1/3 Trench1/3 Lay pipe1/3 Lay pipe1/3 Lay pipe1/3 Refill1/3 Refill1/3 Refill1/3 Example of Laddering UsingFinish-to-Start Relationship Figure 4-15 AON network Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Lag 2 X Y Finish-to-Start Relationship Figure 4-16 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
A B ActivityM ActivityP ActivityN ActivityQ Lag 5 Start-to-Start Relationship Figure 4-17 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Trench1 mile Lay pipe1 mile Lag 3 Refill1 mile Lag 3 Use of Lags to Reduce Detail Figure 4-18 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Prototype Lag 4 Testing Finish-to-Finish Relationship Figure 4-19 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Testing Systemdocumentation Lag 3 Start-to-Start Relationship Figure 4-20 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Lag 4 Code Lag 2 Debug Combination Relationships Figure 4-21 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Lag 10 Lag 5 Lag 10 Legend Lag 5 Lag 10 Network Using Lags Figure 4-22 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Legend Hammock Activity Example Figure 4-23 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Activity-on-Arrow Method Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Activity Event Install software 79 80 AOA Network Building Blocks Figure A4-1 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
BConstructionplans 4 AApplicationapproval CTrafficstudy 1 2 3 DServiceavailabilitycheck 5 Partial Koll Business CenterAOA Network Figure A4-3 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
3 X B A C E 1 2 4 (A) 3 B X A C E 1 2 4 (B) 4 B E C A X 3 1 2 (C) Partial AOA Network Koll Network Figure A4-4a Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
4 B E X A C 3 1 2 D 5 (D) 4 E B X ? A C F 3 5 1 2 D (E) Partial AOA Network Koll Network Figure A4-4b Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
4 E15 B Y X 0 15 0 F10 C10 G170 H35 A5 3 5 6 7 8 1 2 D5 KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department Activity-on-Arrow Network Figure A4-5 Legend ActivityDuration Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
4 E15 20 B 15 Y 0 X 15 35 0 20 F10 C10 G170 H35 A5 5 30 15 235 200 3 5 6 7 8 1 2 10 D5 Legend KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department Activity-on-Arrow NetworkForward Pass Figure A4-6 EF Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
4 185 E15 B 20 X Y 15 0 0 5 F10 C10 G170 H35 A5 20 30 200 235 0 3 5 6 7 8 10 1 2 20 15 D5 Legend KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department LS EF Activity-on-Arrow NetworkBackward Pass Figure A4-7 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
KOLL BUSINESS CENTERCounty Engineers Design Department Activity-on-Arrow Network Backward Pass, Forward Pass, and Slack Figure A4-8 4 185 20 E15 B 15 20 Y X 15 0 5 35 0 F10 C10 G170 H35 A5 20 200 200 30 235 30 0 5 3 5 6 7 8 10 1 2 20 20 15 10 D5 Legend LS EF SLACK = LS – ES or LF – EF Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Software development 18 0 20 22 40 Order standard parts 15 2 17 15 30 Manufacture Custom Hardware 15 15 30 15 30 Orderreview20 20 2 1 2 Produce standard parts 10 2 12 15 15 Assemble 10 30 40 30 40 4 5 6 7 Test 5 40 45 40 45 Design custom parts 13 2 15 2 15 LegendDur. 3 ES EFLS LF Air Control Inc., Custom Order Project—AOA Network Diagram Figure A4-9 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Critical Path Method Reducing Project Time Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
60 Total costs Optimumcost-timepoint 50 40 Low-costplan duration point 30 Costs Direct costs 20 Indirect costs 10 0 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Project duration Project Cost-Time Graph Figure 6-1 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Crashcost Crash point $800 600 Normalpoint Normalcost Activity cost 400 200 0 0 5 10 Activity duration (units) Activity Graph Figure 6-2 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Total direct cost $450 Legend A C G A F E B D E D F G C B 8 2x 3 6 10 11 5 6 6 6 10 5 11 8 Time 25 Time 24 ACT DUR Initial totaldirect cost $ 450 Totaldirect cost $ 470 (a) (b) Activities changed A$20 Cost-Time Trade-Off Example Figure 6-3 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Totaldirect cost $ 495 Time 23 Activities changed D$25 (a) Totaldirect cost $ 525 Time 22 Activities changed F$30 E D A G C F A E B G A B E D C B G F D C F 5 8 10 4x 7 6 2x 10 6 6 6 2x 9 2x 6 10 4x 10 6 9x 6 (b) Totaldirect cost $ 610 Time 21 Activities changed F D E $30 $25 $30 (c) Cost-Time Trade-Off Example (continued) Figure 6-4 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Summary Costs by Duration Figure 6-5 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Totalprojectcost Optimumcost-timepoint $1000 800 $775 Totaldirectcost 600 Cost 400 Totalindirectcost 200 0 20 21 22 23 24 25 Duration (units) Project Cost-Time Graph Figure 6-6 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
Probabilistic Case PERT and PERT Simulation Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
ACTIVITY PROJECT m TE a b (A) (B) Activity and Project FrequencyDistributions Figure A5-1 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
3 13 16 30 5 1 2 5 6 20 6 TE=64 4 Hypothetical Network Figure A5-2 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University
TS=67 TE=64 Possible Project Durations Figure A5-3 Kusdhianto Setiawan Gadjah Mada University