400 likes | 594 Views
LEPS Experiments. Takashi NAKANO (RCNP, Osaka University). Joint Symposium of 'Exotic Hadron' and 'Hadrons in Nuclei' New Frontiers in QCD 2010 Feb. 18th. LEPS Collaboration. Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University : D.S. Ahn, M. Fujiwara, T. Hotta, Y. Kato,
E N D
LEPS Experiments Takashi NAKANO (RCNP, Osaka University) Joint Symposium of 'Exotic Hadron' and 'Hadrons in Nuclei' New Frontiers in QCD 2010Feb. 18th
LEPS Collaboration Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University:D.S. Ahn, M. Fujiwara, T. Hotta, Y. Kato, K. Kino, H. Kohri, Y. Maeda, T. Mibe, N. Muramatsu, T. Nakano, M. Niiyama, T. Sawada, M. Sumihama, M. Uchida, M. Yosoi, T. Yorita, R.G.T. Zegers Department of Physics, Pusan National University:J.K. Ahn School of Physics, Seoul National University:H.C. Bhang Department of Physics, Konan University:H. Akimune Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute / SPring-8:Y. Asano Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica:W.C. Chang, J.Y. Chen Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) / SPring-8: S. Date', H. Ejiri, N. Kumagai, Y. Ohashi, H. Ohkuma, H. Toyokawa Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University:K. Hicks Department of Physics, Kyoto University:K. Imai, H. Fujimura, M. Miyabe, Y. Nakatsugawa, T. Tsunemi Department of Physics, Chiba University:H. Kawai, T. Ooba, Y. Shiino Wakayama Medical University:S. Makino Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Nagoya University:S. Fukui Department of Physics, Yamagata University:T. Iwata Department of Physics, Osaka University:S. Ajimura, K. Horie, M. Nomachi, A. Sakaguchi, S. Shimizu, Y. Sugaya Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan:C. Rangacharyulu Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Tohoku University:T. Ishikawa, H. Shimizu Department of Applied Physics, Miyazaki University:T. Matsuda, Y. Toi Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University:M. Yoshimura National Defense Academy in Japan:T. Matsumura
Schematic View of LEPS Facility Backward-Compton scattering 8 GeV electron Collision Recoil electron Tagging counter 36m 70m a) SPring-8 SR Laser light b) Laser hutch Compton g-ray c) Experimental hutch
Backward-Compton Scattered Photon • 8 GeV electrons in SPring-8 + 351nm Ar laser (3.5eV) maximum 2.4 GeV photon • Laser Power ~6 W Photon Flux ~1 Mcps • E measured by tagging a recoil electron E>1.5 GeV, E ~10 MeV • Laser linear polarization 95-100% ⇒ Highly polarized beam Linear Polarization of beam PWO measurement tagged photon energy [GeV] photon energy [MeV]
Setup of LEPS Detectors Only FWD spectrometer ±20°x ±10° 1.5
g E // B Setup of LEPS Detectors 1.5 Polarized HD target will be ready soon.
TPC Solenoid Magnet Buffer Collimator 24Φ Collimator 21Φ Dipole Magnet TPC Beam 8
TOF SVTX DC1 AC(n=1.03) Photons Target Dipole Magnet 0.7 Tesla Start Counter DC2 DC3 PID in LEPSSpectrometer K/p separation K+ p+ Momentum [GeV/c] Mass/Charge [GeV/c2] P~6 MeV/c for 1 GeV/c TOF~150 ps MASS~30 MeV/c2 for 1 GeV/c Kaon
Large pads 8mm x 13mm Small pads 4mm x 8mm Beam E // B 400mm PID in Time-Projection-Chamber Select K+ in the spectrometer Poster Session I, M17, Y. Nakatsugawa (LEPS Collaboration)
Strangeness Production • Targets of study: • (1020) • , hyperons • Features: • Forward angle measurement, including zero deg. • Polarization observables. • Strangeness production
0,- L LD2 data LH2 data (1405) 0(1385) - (1385) L 0 (1405) (1385) (1520) (1520) N(, K+) GeV/c2 p(, K+) GeV/c2 Acceptance of close to 1. Identification of Hyperon From p/d in LEPS: Missing Mass of K+ Y spectrometer K+ p/d
Y* N* contact term For gauge invariance. Born Diagrams for Hyperon Photoproduction s-channel u-channel t-channel
Photon Beam Asymmetry L(1116) S0(1193) • K+K*-exchange by M. Guidal. • Isobar + Regge by T. Mart and C. Bennhold. • Gent isobar model by T. Corthals Larger contribution from t-channel K* exchange. M. Sumihama et al. (LEPS Collaboration), PRC 73, 035214 (2006)
Wess–Zumino–Witten term S. Ozaki, H. Naghiro, A. Hosaka, PLB 665, 178 (2008) SU(3)
K- Decay Asymmetry Spin Density Matrix K*-exchange Parameterization K-exchange a: fraction of mz=3/2 component. Is the difference mainly caused by the energy dependence or photon-virtuality?
S.i. Nam, A. Hosaka, and H.-Ch. Kim, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 114012 (2005) Dominance of contact term
S.i. Nam, A. Hosaka, and H.-Ch. Kim,Phys. Rev. D, 71, 114012 (2005) Production from Proton Production from Neutron Large isospin asymmetryis expected.
Decay Asymmetry • In K+p mode, an asymmetric distribution suggests an interference effect. The fraction of helicity-3/2 component was about 0.5. • In K-p mode, the helicity-3/2 fraction was around 0.6. Backward Forward
Photoproduction of Λ(1520) from p/d N. Muramatsu et al. (LEPS Collaboration), PRL 103, 012001 (2009)
A Large Isospin Asymmetry in Q+ Production A. Hosaka, Workshop of “Challenge to New Exotic Hadrons with Heavy Quarks”.
Backward p0, h, w, h’, f productions
Experimental method p (detect) g p p0, h, h’, w (in missing mass ) • W ( √s ) = 1.9 – 2.3 GeV • Eg = 1.5 – 2.4 GeV • cosQcm = -1.0 ~-0.6
Missing mass spectra • p p x w/r Eg = 2.3 - 2.4 GeV cosQcm = -1 ~ -0.9 Data Fitting result h’ f h p0 4p 3p 2p Missing Mass2 (GeV2/c4)
Differential cross sections for h photoproduction Jlab/CLAS data Bonn/ELSA data SAID -partial-wave analysis Eta-MAID - isobar model LEPS data I = ½, small J, strong coupling to h, heavy may contain large ss component
Baryon masses in constituent quark model • Mainly 3 quark baryons: M ~ 3mq + (strangeness)+(symmetry) • p, K, and h are light: Nambu-Goldstone bosons of spontaneously brokenchiral symmetry. • 5-quark baryons, naively: M ~ 5mq + (strangeness) +(symmetry) 1700~1900 MeV for Q+ mu ~ md = 300 ~ 350 MeV, ms=mu(d)+130~180 MeV
Experimental status • Not seen in the most of the high energy experiments: The production rate of Q+/L(1520) is less than 1%. • No signal observation in CLAS gp, KEK-PS (p-,K-), (K+,p+) experiments. • The width must be less than 1 MeV. (DIANA and KEK-B)reverse reaction of the Q+ decay: Q+ n K+ • LEPS could be inconsistent with CLAS gd experiment (CLAS-g10). • Production rate depends on reaction mechanism. • K* coupling should be VERY small. • K coupling should be small. • Strong angle or energy dependence.
Difference between LEPS and CLASfor gn K-Q+ study LEPS Good forward angle coverage Poor wide angle coverage Low energy Symmetric acceptance for K+ and K- MKK>1.04 GeV/c2 Select quasi-free process CLAS Poor forward angle coverage Good wide angle coverage Medium energy Asymmetric acceptance MKK > 1.07 GeV/c2 Require re-scattering or large Fermi momentum of a spectator ~ K- coverage: LEPS: qLAB < 20 degree CLAS: qLAB > 20 degree
Quasi-free production of Q+ and L(1520) detected K- K+ Eg=1.5~2.4 GeV K+ K- g g Q+ L(1520) n p n p p n p n Data was taken in 2002-2003. spectator • Both reactions are quasi-free processes. • Fermi-motion should be corrected. • Existence of a spectator nucleon characterize both reactions.
Results of L(1520) analysis pK- invariant mass with MMSA: Fermi motion effect corrected. Simple (g,K+) missing mass: No correction on Fermi motion effect. Structure with a width less than 30 MeV/c2 requires a physics process or fluctuation. The total cross section is ~1 mb, which is consistent with the LAMP2 measurements. D(-2lnL) =55.1 for Dndf=2 7.1s
Results of Q+ analysis nK+ invariant mass with MMSA: Fermi motion effect corrected. Simple (g,K-) missing mass: No correction on Fermi motion effect. PRC 79, 025210 (2009) “The narrow peak appears only after Fermi motion correction.” D(-2lnL) =31.1 for Dndf=2 5.2s
Next step Probability of 1/5000000 may not be low enough. “Extraordinary claim requires an extraordinary evidence.” High statistics data was collected in 2006-2007 with the same experimental setup. Blind analysis is under way to check the Θ+ peak
Q+ search experiment at J-PARC • Reverse reaction of the Q+ decay using a low energy K+ beam gives an unambiguous answer. K+n → Q+ → KS0p • Cross-section depends on only the spin and the decay width. for J = ½ • 26.4 mb/MeV CEX (K+n→KS0p) ~7 mb Inside 1 Tesla solenoid + TPC Forward DCs LD2 target K+ ~800 MeV/c ~420 MeV/c proton BeO degrader ~40 cm -
LEPS2 Project at SPring-8 High intensity: Multi (ex. 4) laser injection w/ large aperture beam-line & Laser beam shaping ~10 7 photons/s(LEPS ~10 6 ) High energy:Re-injection of X-ray from undulator E < 7.5GeV (LEPS < 3GeV) Backward Compton Scattering 8 GeV electron Recoil electron (Tagging) 30mlong line (LEPS 7.8m) Laser or re-injected X-ray GeV g-ray Better divergencebeam collimated photon beam Different focus points for multi CW laser injection Inside building Outside building Large 4p spectrometer based on BNL-E949 detector system. Better resolutions are expected. New DAQ system will be adopted. Experimental hutch
Summary • LEPS is a Backward Compton gamma beam facility at SPring-8. GeV g beam with high polarization is available. • LEPS detector has a good forward angle acceptance which is complimentary to the CLAS acceptance. • LEPS provides essential information to understand production mechanism of hyperons. • A new experiment with a Time Projection Chamber has been started. • Strong isospin dependence was observed in L(1520) photo-production. • Evidence for new baryon resonance in h photo-production, which may contain ss component. • 5-sQ+ peak was observed in the nK+ invariant mass at 1.53 GeV/c2. New data set with 3 times more statistics was taken. Blind analysis is under way. • 8. LEPS2 project is ongoing: 10 times stronger beam & 4p coverage.